FR EA

Contract analysis

Clause-by-clause risk read on any document of the firm. Pick a contract, or open any document from a matter.

Contract analysis / email-settlement-overture-from-crs.eml
email-settlement-overture-from-crs.eml
1012-00005 · 8 clauses
High · 0 Medium · 1 Standard · 1
From: Harrison Caldwell <hcaldwell@caldwellroyce.com>
From: Harrison Caldwell <hcaldwell@caldwellroyce.com> To: Samuel Eklund <seklund@calderwoodharkness.com> Cc: Meredith Shapiro <mshapiro@caldwellroyce.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 04:17:00 -0000 Subject: Vantor Holdings Corp. v. Stonefield Logistics Group Inc., No. 22-cv-07841 (S.D.N.Y.) — Resolution Discussion
**THIS COMMUNICATION IS MADE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 408 AND IS INTENDED SOLE
**THIS COMMUNICATION IS MADE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 408 AND IS INTENDED SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SETTLEMENT DISCUSSION. IT IS NOT AN ADMISSION OF ANY FACT, CLAIM, OR LIABILITY.**
I am writing with respect to the above-captioned matter, pending before the Hon. Margaret
I am writing with respect to the above-captioned matter, pending before the Hon. Margaret T. Calloway, U.S.D.J. As you are aware, fact discovery under the Case Management Order has effectively concluded, and the parties have exchanged expert reports — our Trask Greystone report was served on May 15, and your Kensington Analytics rebuttal followed on August 25. The case is now proceeding toward expert depositions and,
I have had the opportunity to discuss this matter at length with my client and Mr. Vantoro
I have had the opportunity to discuss this matter at length with my client and Mr. Vantorovich, and Vantor would be open to discussing a resolution of this dispute short of further litigation. Both sides have devoted considerable resources to this case over the past year, and while we remain confident in the merits of our claims, we recognize that a negotiated resolution — if achievable on appropriate terms — could s
With that in mind, I would propose that the parties engage in a formal mediation before a
With that in mind, I would propose that the parties engage in a formal mediation before a mutually agreeable neutral mediator, ideally within the next 45 to 60 days. A session in the mid-November to mid-December timeframe should be workable without disrupting the current case schedule or pending expert discovery deadlines. I am happy to discuss mediator candidates at your convenience and would welcome any suggestions
I hope we can explore this constructively. Please feel free to call me at your convenience Standard
⚑ Commercial term
I hope we can explore this constructively. Please feel free to call me at your convenience if you would like to discuss.
**Harrison Caldwell**
**Harrison Caldwell** Partner Caldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP 1 Liberty Plaza, 22nd Floor New York, New York 10006 T: (212) 554-8100 F: (212) 554-8101 hcaldwell@caldwellroyce.com
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole u Medium
⚑ Confidentiality undertaking
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, privileged, and/or attorney work product information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.*