Contract analysis
Clause-by-clause risk read on any document of the firm. Pick a contract, or open any document from a matter.
Contract analysis / preliminary-damages-framework-memo.docx
preliminary-damages-framework-memo.docx
High · 1
Medium · 2
Standard · 5
I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS MEMORANDUM
Medium
⚑ Confidentiality undertaking
I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS MEMORANDUM This memorandum provides the preliminary damages framework for Dr. Lawrence Kessler's use in developing his expert report and opinions on patent damages in Optiwave Semiconductor Corp. v. Lumos Photonics, Inc., Case No. 5:22-cv-03417-EJD (N.D. Cal.). It is intended to serve as an orienting document that identifies and synthesizes the key facts, revenue data, patent portfolio co
II. CASE BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE
II. CASE BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE A. The Parties
1. Plaintiff — Optiwave Semiconductor Corp. (OWS). Optiwave Semiconductor Corp. ("OWS" or
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
1. Plaintiff — Optiwave Semiconductor Corp. (OWS). Optiwave Semiconductor Corp. ("OWS" or "Optiwave") is a Delaware corporation headquartered at 2775 Augustine Drive, Suite 400, San Jose, California 95054. OWS is a fabless semiconductor design company specializing in the design and commercialization of silicon photonics integrated circuits for data center interconnects and telecommunications applications. Founded in
2. Defendant — Lumos Photonics, Inc. (Lumos). Lumos Photonics, Inc. ("Lumos") is a Delawa
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
2. Defendant — Lumos Photonics, Inc. (Lumos). Lumos Photonics, Inc. ("Lumos") is a Delaware corporation headquartered at 9400 McNeil Drive, Building 7, Austin, Texas 78758. Unlike OWS, Lumos operates as an integrated device manufacturer ("IDM"), meaning it both designs and fabricates its own silicon photonics components. Lumos specializes in the design, fabrication, and sale of silicon photonics components and module
III. THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT AND ACCUSED PRODUCTS
III. THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT AND ACCUSED PRODUCTS A. Asserted Patents — Summary OWS asserts infringement of four U.S. utility patents, each of which covers a distinct but interconnected subsystem within high-speed silicon photonics optical transceiver technology. The four patents collectively address the principal functional elements of a silicon photonics transceiver chipset — waveguide coupling, photodetection, wavelen
1. U.S. Patent No. 10,234,567 ("the '567 Patent")
1. U.S. Patent No. 10,234,567 ("the '567 Patent") The '567 Patent is titled "Integrated Waveguide Coupler with Tapered Mode Converter for Silicon Photonics Platforms." The application was filed on March 14, 2017, and the patent issued on March 19, 2019. The named inventors are Dr. Kevin Fong, Dr. Priya Ramanathan, and Hideo Tanaka. OWS asserts Claims 1, 4, 7, 12, and 15 of the '567 Patent. The core technology claimed
2. U.S. Patent No. 10,891,234 ("the '234 Patent")
2. U.S. Patent No. 10,891,234 ("the '234 Patent") The '234 Patent is titled "Germanium-on-Silicon Photodetector with Graded Buffer Layer for Enhanced Responsivity." The application was filed on September 8, 2017, and the patent issued on January 14, 2021. The named inventors are Dr. Kevin Fong and Dr. Amara Osei. OWS asserts Claims 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 of the '234 Patent. The core technology claimed in the '234 Patent
3. U.S. Patent No. 11,045,678 ("the '678 Patent")
3. U.S. Patent No. 11,045,678 ("the '678 Patent") The '678 Patent is titled "Multi-Channel Optical Transceiver with Integrated Wavelength-Division Multiplexing on Silicon." The application was filed on June 22, 2018, and the patent issued on June 29, 2021. The named inventors are Dr. Priya Ramanathan, Dr. Amara Osei, and Liwei Zhang. OWS asserts Claims 1, 2, 6, 9, and 14 of the '678 Patent. The core technology claime
4. U.S. Patent No. 11,312,890 ("the '890 Patent")
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
4. U.S. Patent No. 11,312,890 ("the '890 Patent") The '890 Patent is titled "Driver Circuit Architecture for High-Speed Silicon Photonic Mach-Zehnder Modulators." The application was filed on November 15, 2018, and the patent issued on April 26, 2022. The named inventors are Dr. Kevin Fong and Rajesh Iyer. OWS asserts Claims 1, 5, 8, and 13 of the '890 Patent. The core technology claimed in the '890 Patent is a pre-e
1. LumosBridge™ 800G Optical Engine
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
1. LumosBridge™ 800G Optical Engine The LumosBridge 800G Optical Engine is a co-packaged optics engine designed for use in hyperscale data center network switches. The LumosBridge integrates silicon photonics components with electronic driver and receiver circuitry in a single package, enabling 800 gigabits per second (800G) of optical bandwidth per engine. The LumosBridge was first shipped to customers in the first
2. LumosEdge™ 400ZR+ Pluggable Transceiver
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
2. LumosEdge™ 400ZR+ Pluggable Transceiver The LumosEdge 400ZR+ Pluggable Transceiver is a QSFP-DD form factor pluggable optical transceiver module designed for metro networking and data center interconnect ("DCI") applications. The LumosEdge has been in production since the third quarter of 2021 (Q3 2021) and has established a significant market presence in the rapidly growing 400ZR/400ZR+ pluggable coherent optics
IV. PRIMARY DAMAGES THEORY: REASONABLE ROYALTY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 284
Medium
⚑ Notice / time limit to track
IV. PRIMARY DAMAGES THEORY: REASONABLE ROYALTY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 284 A. Legal Framework The primary damages theory in this case is a reasonable royalty under 35 U.S.C. § 284, which provides that "the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs as f
V. GEORGIA-PACIFIC FACTOR ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK
High
⚑ Penalty / liquidated damages
V. GEORGIA-PACIFIC FACTOR ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK A. Overview. The 15 Georgia-Pacific factors provide the principal analytical structure for determining the reasonable royalty rate in the hypothetical negotiation between OWS as willing licensor and Lumos as willing licensee. The factors are designed to capture the full range of considerations that would inform a rational economic bargain between the parties, including the