FR EA

Contract analysis

Clause-by-clause risk read on any document of the firm. Pick a contract, or open any document from a matter.

Contract analysis / third-quarterly-status-report.docx
third-quarterly-status-report.docx
1016-00005 · 21 clauses
High · 2 Medium · 0 Standard · 1
I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Ridgeline Midstream Services LLC ("Ridgeline" or "Applicant"), a Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Dunmore Energy Holdings Ltd. ("DEH"), a Cayman Islands exempted limited company (Cayman Registry No. CR-381204), hereby files this Third Quarterly Status Report ("Third Report") in the above-captioned proceedings. This filing is made pursuant to the March 4, 20
II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND High
⚑ Penalty / liquidated damages
II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The following procedural summary provides context for this Third Quarterly Status Report and supplements the procedural histories set forth in Ridgeline's prior quarterly reports. A. Original Filing and Initial Proceedings On May 12, 2022, Ridgeline filed its original application in these dockets, seeking (i) approval of an initial tariff rate for interstate natural gas transportation servic
I. Extensions of Time
I. Extensions of Time The procedural history of this matter has been characterized by a series of extensions of time necessitated by the scope of the required tariff redesign: First Extension. Ridgeline filed its first request for extension of time on April 28, 2023, seeking an additional 120 days to complete its response to the Deficiency Letter and to advance the tariff redesign process. ALJ Whitfield granted the f
III. STATUS OF TARIFF REDESIGN High
⚑ Penalty / liquidated damages
III. STATUS OF TARIFF REDESIGN A. Overall Progress and Near-Final State Ridgeline is pleased to confirm that the redesign of FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, has reached a near-final state and that Ridgeline fully intends to meet the February 21, 2025 filing deadline established by the ALJ's March 4, 2024 Order. During the reporting period covered by this Third Report (September 15, 2024 through December 13, 2
IV. STATUS OF SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS
IV. STATUS OF SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS A. Fourth Settlement Conference A fourth settlement conference in these dockets was held on January 18, 2024 before Settlement Judge Howard Margolis. All active parties participated in the conference: (a) Ridgeline Midstream Services LLC, through counsel Calderwood & Harkness LLP (George Trujillo and Brett Callahan); (b) Appalachian Trunk Pipeline Company, LLC, through counsel Kel
1. Return on Equity. The parties remain significantly apart on the appropriate ROE for the
1. Return on Equity. The parties remain significantly apart on the appropriate ROE for the Ridgeline Pipeline System. ATPC proposes an ROE of 10.75%, which it contends reflects the lower risk profile of the Ridgeline system in light of its favorable geographic position within the Appalachian production basin. MGPC, supported by the testimony of Dr. Eleanor Vasquez, MGPC's rate expert, proposes an ROE of 11.25%, which
2. Interconnection Cost Allocation. The parties remain unable to agree on the allocation o
2. Interconnection Cost Allocation. The parties remain unable to agree on the allocation of interconnection facilities costs for the Wetzel County Interconnect. The total estimated cost of the interconnection facilities—including the new meter station, pig launcher/receiver, ultrasonic flow meters, gas chromatographs, SCADA integration, and associated civil and mechanical work—is $22.3 million. ATPC insists on a 50/5
3. Load Factor. All three intervenors—ATPC, MGPC, and CMGA—advocate for a load factor of 8
3. Load Factor. All three intervenors—ATPC, MGPC, and CMGA—advocate for a load factor of 85% or higher, contending that the Ridgeline Pipeline System's projected throughput growth justifies a higher load factor assumption than the 75% proposed by Ridgeline. Ridgeline maintains that a 75% load factor is appropriate given the system's current utilization of approximately 56.67% and the uncertainty inherent in throughpu
V. STATUS OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT
V. STATUS OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT The Interconnection Agreement between Ridgeline and ATPC for the physical interconnection at the Wetzel County Interconnect is currently in its third draft (Version 3.0, dated April 2023). This version was revised following the issuance of the January 19, 2023 Deficiency Letter to reflect the requirement that the interconnection agreement be filed as a FERC rate schedule, thereb
VI. RIDGELINE'S COMMITMENT TO THE FEBRUARY 21, 2025 FILING DEADLINE
VI. RIDGELINE'S COMMITMENT TO THE FEBRUARY 21, 2025 FILING DEADLINE Ridgeline hereby confirms its intent to file the redesigned FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, together with all supplemental pre-filed testimony and supporting exhibits, on or before the February 21, 2025 deadline established by the ALJ's March 4, 2024 Order. Ridgeline takes this commitment seriously and recognizes that the ALJ's grant of a thi
VII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
VII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A. Ridgeline Operations Update Ridgeline reports that the Ridgeline Pipeline System continues to operate safely and reliably. Current throughput on the system is approximately 680 MMcf/d, representing approximately 56.67% of the system's 1.2 Bcf/d design capacity. The system entered commercial service on October 1, 2021. The pipeline construction cost was $587.2 million, and the system com
VIII. SERVICE LIST AND CONTACT INFORMATION
VIII. SERVICE LIST AND CONTACT INFORMATION Counsel for Ridgeline Midstream Services LLC: Calderwood & Harkness LLP George Trujillo, Responsible Partner Brett Callahan, Lead Associate David Stanton, Working Associate 1601 K Street NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 555-4800 C&H Matter No. 1016-00005 Billing Partner: Patricia Dunmore (dual role as DEH Founder/Chairperson disclosed and waived by client)
IX. CONCLUSION AND REQUEST
IX. CONCLUSION AND REQUEST WHEREFORE, Ridgeline Midstream Services LLC respectfully requests that the Honorable Administrative Law Judge Clara Whitfield accept this Third Quarterly Status Report as satisfying the quarterly reporting condition imposed by the March 4, 2024 Order granting Ridgeline's third extension of time in Docket Nos. RP22-847-000 and RP22-847-001. Ridgeline confirms its commitment to filing the red
I. Introduction and Purpose | 3
I. Introduction and Purpose | 3
III. Status of Tariff Redesign | 11
III. Status of Tariff Redesign | 11
IV. Status of Settlement Discussions | 22
IV. Status of Settlement Discussions | 22
V. Status of Interconnection Agreement | 26
V. Status of Interconnection Agreement | 26
VI. Ridgeline's Commitment to the February 21, 2025 Filing Deadline | 29
VI. Ridgeline's Commitment to the February 21, 2025 Filing Deadline | 29
VII. Additional Information | 31
VII. Additional Information | 31
VIII. Service List and Contact Information | 35
VIII. Service List and Contact Information | 35
IX. Conclusion and Request | 37 Standard
⚑ Commercial term
IX. Conclusion and Request | 37 Certificate of Service | 38 Rate Base Component | Amount ($ millions) Net Plant in Service | $563.71 Working Capital Allowance | $18.64 Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (ADIT) | ($12.45) Other Rate Base Items | $42.50 Total Rate Base | $612.40 Cost-of-Service Component | Original ($ millions) | Revised ($ millions) | Change ($ millions) Return on Rate Base | $61.62 | $56.57 | ($5.05)