Contract analysis
Clause-by-clause risk read on any document of the firm. Pick a contract, or open any document from a matter.
Contract analysis / memo-carve-out-structuring.docx
memo-carve-out-structuring.docx
High · 2
Medium · 2
Standard · 6
I. Executive Summary
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
I. Executive Summary This memorandum analyzes the carve-out provisions negotiated in the proposed $175,000,000 senior secured superpriority debtor-in-possession credit facility (the "DIP Facility") among Greenfield Agricultural Partners LLC ("Greenfield" or the "Debtor"), Ironclad Capital Partners LP, as Administrative Agent (the "DIP Agent"), Ridgeline Opportunity Fund III LP and Bramblewood Credit Advisors LLC, as
II. Background — The DIP Facility and Professional Fee Context
Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
II. Background — The DIP Facility and Professional Fee Context A. Overview of DIP Facility Terms On May 15, 2025 (the "Petition Date"), Greenfield Agricultural Partners LLC commenced a voluntary case under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division (the "Court"). The Debtor has negotiated, on a pre-petition basis, the terms of a DIP
III. The Proposed Carve-Out Structure
High
⚑ Non-compete / exclusivity restraint
III. The Proposed Carve-Out Structure The carve-out provision in the draft DIP Credit Agreement (Section 2.11) and the corresponding provisions in the Proposed Interim and Final DIP Orders establish a two-component carve-out: a pre-trigger component and a post-trigger component. Each is described and analyzed below. A. Pre-Trigger Carve-Out Description. The pre-trigger carve-out is uncapped and covers all accrued but
IV. Legal Framework — Carve-Outs in DIP Financing
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
IV. Legal Framework — Carve-Outs in DIP Financing A. Statutory and Case Law Basis No provision of the Bankruptcy Code expressly mandates that a carve-out for professional fees be included in a DIP financing order. The carve-out is a creature of negotiation and judicial practice, developed over decades of Chapter 11 precedent as a mechanism to balance the interests of DIP lenders (who seek the broadest possible collat
1. Carve-Out (pre-trigger: uncapped accrued but unpaid professional fees; post-trigger: $
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
1. Carve-Out (pre-trigger: uncapped accrued but unpaid professional fees; post-trigger: $3,000,000 aggregate)
2. DIP Facility Obligations (superpriority administrative expense claim under § 364(c)(1)
2. DIP Facility Obligations (superpriority administrative expense claim under § 364(c)(1); priming liens under § 364(d); first-priority liens on unencumbered assets under § 364(c)(2) and (c)(3))
3. Adequate Protection Obligations for Prairie State Bank, N.A. (replacement liens junior
3. Adequate Protection Obligations for Prairie State Bank, N.A. (replacement liens junior to DIP liens and carve-out; § 507(b) superpriority claim junior to DIP superpriority claim)
4. Other Administrative Expense Claims under § 503(b)
4. Other Administrative Expense Claims under § 503(b)
5. Pre-Petition Unsecured Claims
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
5. Pre-Petition Unsecured Claims The adequate protection package for Prairie State Bank, N.A. — which includes replacement liens on all estate assets (junior to the DIP liens and the carve-out) and a § 507(b) superpriority administrative expense claim (junior to the DIP Lenders' superpriority claim) — is structured to be subordinate to the carve-out at every level. It is critical that this subordination be expressly
V. Market Comparison — Agricultural and Chemical Industry Chapter 11 Carve-Outs
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
V. Market Comparison — Agricultural and Chemical Industry Chapter 11 Carve-Outs A. Methodology. To assess whether the proposed carve-out structure is within the range of market terms, we reviewed publicly available DIP financing orders in agricultural, specialty chemical, and industrial manufacturing Chapter 11 cases filed between 2020 and 2025. Our review focused on cases involving DIP facilities in the $100,000,000
VI. Key Negotiation Points and Recommendations
Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
VI. Key Negotiation Points and Recommendations Based on the foregoing analysis, we recommend pursuing the following modifications to the proposed carve-out provisions in the upcoming negotiation sessions with Harmon & Keach LLP. Each recommendation is accompanied by supporting rationale and, where applicable, a fallback position. A. Increase Post-Trigger Professional Fee Carve-Out Recommendation. The post-trigger pro
VII. Interaction with Other DIP Facility Provisions
High
⚑ Non-compete / exclusivity restraint
VII. Interaction with Other DIP Facility Provisions The carve-out provisions do not operate in isolation. They interact with several other material provisions of the DIP Credit Agreement and the broader case structure. This section analyzes the most significant interactions. A. Events of Default The Events of Default in the DIP Credit Agreement determine the circumstances under which the DIP Agent may deliver a trigg
VIII. Proposed Carve-Out Language — Drafting Considerations
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
VIII. Proposed Carve-Out Language — Drafting Considerations This section identifies the key definitions, priority waterfall language, and protective provisions that should be included in the carve-out section of the DIP Credit Agreement and the Proposed Interim and Final DIP Orders. A. Key Definitions to Include The following defined terms should be included in the DIP Credit Agreement (or, if already present, should