Contract analysis
Clause-by-clause risk read on any document of the firm. Pick a contract, or open any document from a matter.
Contract analysis / review-vasquez-draft-report-memo.docx
review-vasquez-draft-report-memo.docx
High · 0
Medium · 2
Standard · 7
I. Purpose and Summary
I. Purpose and Summary The purpose of this memorandum is to provide Elaine Forsythe with a detailed analysis of the draft expert report prepared by Dr. Helen Vasquez, CPA, CFF, of Meridian Forensic Economics LLC, which was received by Calderwood & Harkness on September 5, 2023. Dr. Vasquez's report quantifies the total business-interruption ("BI") losses sustained by our client, Verimark Hospitality Group Inc. ("VHG"
II. Overview of Dr. Vasquez's Draft Report
II. Overview of Dr. Vasquez's Draft Report A. Report Structure and Scope Dr. Vasquez was retained by Calderwood & Harkness on behalf of VHG on April 20, 2023, pursuant to an expert retention letter executed on that date. Her engagement is to quantify VHG's business-interruption losses under the all-risk property and BI policies at issue in this litigation. A scope memorandum dated May 1, 2023, prepared by Dr. Vasquez
1. Qualifications and Methodology — This section sets forth Dr. Vasquez's professional qu
Medium
⚑ Assignment / subcontracting
1. Qualifications and Methodology — This section sets forth Dr. Vasquez's professional qualifications, her retention and the scope of her assignment, the data and materials she reviewed, and a detailed explanation of the "but-for" analytical methodology she employed to quantify BI losses.
2. Property-by-Property Loss Calculations — This section presents the BI loss analysis fo
2. Property-by-Property Loss Calculations — This section presents the BI loss analysis for each of the three VHG properties: (a) Verimark Grand Key Resort, Marathon, Florida; (b) Verimark Harborview Hotel & Conference Center, Fort Myers Beach, Florida; and (c) Verimark Sunset Shores, St. Pete Beach, Florida.
3. Aggregate Loss Summary — This section aggregates the property-level losses into a tota
3. Aggregate Loss Summary — This section aggregates the property-level losses into a total BI loss figure and reconciles the total with the insurance tower.
4. Supporting Exhibits and Appendices — The report is accompanied by detailed exhibits, i
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
4. Supporting Exhibits and Appendices — The report is accompanied by detailed exhibits, including historical financial data, ADR and occupancy trend analyses, reservation and booking records, saved-expense calculations, extra-expense documentation, and supporting schedules for each property. Dr. Vasquez's professional credentials are as follows: she holds a CPA license and has obtained the Certified in Financial Fore
III. Property-by-Property Analysis
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
III. Property-by-Property Analysis A. Verimark Grand Key Resort (Marathon, FL — Mile Marker 48, Marathon, FL 33050) The Verimark Grand Key Resort is VHG's flagship Florida Keys property, a 312-room luxury resort and full-service marina located at Mile Marker 48 in Marathon, Monroe County, Florida. The property features a deep-water marina with 85 slips, a full-service spa, four dining outlets, and a water-sports cent
1. Seasonality Discussion. Dr. Vasquez should add a paragraph explicitly addressing the s
1. Seasonality Discussion. Dr. Vasquez should add a paragraph explicitly addressing the seasonality of the Florida Keys hospitality market, noting that the September 18, 2022 through March 15, 2023 closure period encompasses the heart of the high season (November through April). This discussion should reference STR data and VHG's own historical monthly ADR trends to demonstrate that the $389 ADR assumption is, if any
2. Cross-Reference to Caldwell Engineering Report. The draft report should cross-referenc
2. Cross-Reference to Caldwell Engineering Report. The draft report should cross-reference the Caldwell Engineering draft report's conclusion regarding the restoration timeline at Grand Key. Specifically, Dr. Vasquez should cite Caldwell's findings on the nature and severity of the structural damage, the sequence of required repairs, and the external factors (contractor availability, permit delays, material supply co
3. Sensitivity Analysis. Dr. Vasquez should include a sensitivity analysis demonstrating
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
3. Sensitivity Analysis. Dr. Vasquez should include a sensitivity analysis demonstrating that even under the shortened restoration scenarios proposed by Arbor Claims Services (Ironclad's adjusting firm, through adjuster Denise Whitford), the BI losses at Grand Key alone would still exceed $25,000,000 — the Ironclad primary layer limit. This analysis would show that even if the defense succeeds in compressing the rest
1. Conference-Revenue Documentation. Dr. Vasquez should strengthen the conference-revenue
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
1. Conference-Revenue Documentation. Dr. Vasquez should strengthen the conference-revenue section of the Harborview analysis with specific references to the documentary evidence supporting each canceled event. This should include: (a) executed booking contracts or letters of intent for the canceled conferences; (b) evidence of forfeited deposits or cancellation fees; (c) correspondence between VHG and event organizer
2. Historical Booking Patterns. Dr. Vasquez should add a footnote or brief discussion not
Medium
⚑ Assignment / subcontracting
2. Historical Booking Patterns. Dr. Vasquez should add a footnote or brief discussion noting that several of the canceled conferences were annual recurring events with multi-year booking histories at Harborview. For example, if a particular industry conference had been held at Harborview for three or more consecutive years and was canceled in 2022–2023 solely due to the hurricane closure, this historical pattern subs
1. Reduced-Capacity Methodology. Dr. Vasquez should clarify in the report that the "reduc
1. Reduced-Capacity Methodology. Dr. Vasquez should clarify in the report that the "reduced capacity" during the December 2022 through February 2023 period is quantified based on the specific number of rooms that were out of service due to ongoing repairs. This quantification should be supported by VHG's internal daily occupancy tracking records (from the property management system) showing which rooms were available
2. Daubert Readiness. The partial-closure methodology at Sunset Shores is more complex th
2. Daubert Readiness. The partial-closure methodology at Sunset Shores is more complex than a straightforward full-closure analysis and therefore presents a somewhat larger target for a reliability challenge under Florida's Daubert standard (which became effective in 2019 under Fla. Stat. § 90.702). Dr. Vasquez should ensure that the partial-closure methodology is explained with sufficient granularity and transparenc
IV. Cross-Cutting Methodological Strengths
IV. Cross-Cutting Methodological Strengths In addition to the property-specific strengths identified above, several cross-cutting features of Dr. Vasquez's draft report merit recognition as overall strengths that enhance the report's credibility and resilience against anticipated defense challenges: Reliable Data Sources. Dr. Vasquez relied on a comprehensive set of reliable data sources in constructing her analysis.
V. Anticipated Defense Challenges and Vulnerabilities
V. Anticipated Defense Challenges and Vulnerabilities This section addresses the principal challenges that defense counsel and the defense expert are expected to raise against Dr. Vasquez's report, and identifies the vulnerabilities in the current draft that should be addressed before finalization. A. Windstorm Sub-Limit Issue This is the single most consequential coverage issue in the case. Ironclad asserts that a $
VI. Comparison with Defense Expert (Anticipated Positions of Dr. Warren Birk, Graystone Co
VI. Comparison with Defense Expert (Anticipated Positions of Dr. Warren Birk, Graystone Consulting Group LLC) Dr. Birk's affirmative expert report is also due to be served on September 15, 2023, the same date as Dr. Vasquez's report. We do not have access to Dr. Birk's draft and have no advance knowledge of his specific conclusions. However, based on Dr. Birk's prior engagements in hurricane BI disputes (including hi
1. Compressed Period of Restoration. Dr. Birk will likely propose a shortened restoration
1. Compressed Period of Restoration. Dr. Birk will likely propose a shortened restoration timeline for each property, arguing that VHG could have completed repairs more quickly with reasonable diligence. Based on his prior reports, we anticipate he will argue Grand Key could have reopened 30 to 45 days earlier, Harborview 20 to 30 days earlier, and Sunset Shores 10 to 15 days earlier. Each day of compression directly
2. Lower ADR and/or Occupancy Assumptions. Dr. Birk may argue that Dr. Vasquez's ADR and
2. Lower ADR and/or Occupancy Assumptions. Dr. Birk may argue that Dr. Vasquez's ADR and occupancy assumptions are overstated, possibly contending that post-hurricane market conditions in southwestern Florida would have depressed demand and rates even absent VHG's specific property closures. This is a market-disruption argument: that the hurricane itself would have reduced travel demand to the affected areas regardle
3. Application of the $15M Windstorm Sub-Limit. If Dr. Birk has been instructed by defens
3. Application of the $15M Windstorm Sub-Limit. If Dr. Birk has been instructed by defense counsel to assume the $15,000,000 named-windstorm sub-limit applies, his report may present a capped loss figure of $15,000,000. Alternatively, he may present a loss figure both with and without the sub-limit, or he may address the sub-limit as a legal assumption and present his loss figure without it. In any event, the sub-lim
4. Flood / Storm Surge Allocation at Grand Key. Dr. Birk may attempt to allocate a portio
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
4. Flood / Storm Surge Allocation at Grand Key. Dr. Birk may attempt to allocate a portion of the Grand Key losses to flood/storm surge damage and exclude those amounts under the flood exclusion. This would involve constructing a hypothetical timeline separating wind-damage restoration from flood-damage restoration and attributing a portion of the closure period (and corresponding losses) to flood. Such an allocation
5. Challenge to Conference Revenue at Harborview. As discussed in Section III.B above, Dr
5. Challenge to Conference Revenue at Harborview. As discussed in Section III.B above, Dr. Birk will likely challenge the conference-revenue component of the Harborview loss as speculative, arguing that some conferences would have been relocated to alternative venues and that the associated revenue was not entirely lost to VHG. Dr. Vasquez's rebuttal expert report, which is due on October 2, 2023, will need to addres
VII. Summary of Suggested Revisions
VII. Summary of Suggested Revisions The following is a consolidated list of all revisions recommended to Dr. Vasquez's draft report before finalization and service on September 15, 2023:
1. Add Explicit Seasonality Discussion for Grand Key Resort ADR. Include a paragraph addr
1. Add Explicit Seasonality Discussion for Grand Key Resort ADR. Include a paragraph addressing the seasonality of the Florida Keys hospitality market, noting that the high-season months (November through April) fall within the September 18, 2022 through March 15, 2023 closure period, thereby supporting the $389 ADR assumption. Reference STR data and VHG's historical monthly ADR trends.
2. Include Sensitivity Analysis at Grand Key. Prepare and include a sensitivity analysis
2. Include Sensitivity Analysis at Grand Key. Prepare and include a sensitivity analysis demonstrating that even under the shortened restoration scenarios proposed by Arbor Claims Services (Denise Whitford's adjustment), BI losses at Grand Key alone would still exceed $25,000,000 — the Ironclad primary layer limit — thereby confirming that Ironclad's full layer is exhausted regardless of the period-of-restoration out
3. Cross-Reference Caldwell Engineering Restoration-Timeline Conclusions. For each proper
3. Cross-Reference Caldwell Engineering Restoration-Timeline Conclusions. For each property, cross-reference the conclusions of Jeffrey Caldwell, PE, of Caldwell Engineering Associates Inc. regarding the restoration timeline, structural damage severity, and the reasonableness of the actual closure periods.
4. Strengthen Conference-Revenue Documentation at Harborview. Supplement the conference-r
4. Strengthen Conference-Revenue Documentation at Harborview. Supplement the conference-revenue section with specific references to canceled event booking contracts, forfeited deposits, event-organizer correspondence confirming cancellations, and historical booking data showing multi-year recurring events.
5. Clarify Reduced-Capacity Quantification Methodology at Sunset Shores. Provide granular
5. Clarify Reduced-Capacity Quantification Methodology at Sunset Shores. Provide granular room-out-of-service data for the December 2022 through February 2023 partial-closure period, supported by VHG's property management system records and Caldwell Engineering's damage assessment of the specific building sections undergoing repair.
6. Add Statement Regarding Disputed Coverage Limitations. Include a statement that the re
6. Add Statement Regarding Disputed Coverage Limitations. Include a statement that the report quantifies total BI losses without reference to disputed coverage limitations, including the named-windstorm sub-limit. Note that the application of any sub-limit is a legal question outside the scope of the damages analysis.
7. Add Note Regarding Non-Allocation of Losses by Cause. Include a note that the analysis
7. Add Note Regarding Non-Allocation of Losses by Cause. Include a note that the analysis does not allocate BI losses between wind-caused and flood-caused closure periods, consistent with VHG's legal position on the concurrent causation issue, and that no supplemental causal allocation has been requested.
8. Expand Extra-Expense / Mitigation-Effort Section. Create a dedicated subsection highli
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
8. Expand Extra-Expense / Mitigation-Effort Section. Create a dedicated subsection highlighting VHG's affirmative mitigation efforts and the associated extra expenses incurred to expedite restoration, with categories, amounts, and an explanation of how each expenditure reduced the duration or magnitude of the business interruption.
9. Add Restoration-Period Reasonableness Section or Appendix. Include a section or append
9. Add Restoration-Period Reasonableness Section or Appendix. Include a section or appendix addressing the reasonableness of the actual restoration periods at each property, incorporating data on regional contractor demand, building permit processing timelines, specialty material supply-chain constraints, and other post-Callista conditions that contributed to the restoration durations.
10. Strengthen Daubert Readiness of Methodology Section. Ensure that the methodology sect
10. Strengthen Daubert Readiness of Methodology Section. Ensure that the methodology section explicitly articulates the reliability factors relevant under Florida's Daubert standard (Fla. Stat. § 90.702): testability, peer review and acceptance, known error rates, and consistency with generally accepted accounting and forensic economics principles.
11. Verify Internal Consistency of Financial Figures. Review all financial figures in the
Standard
⚑ Commercial term
11. Verify Internal Consistency of Financial Figures. Review all financial figures in the report for internal consistency and verify against VHG's audited financial statements and property management system data produced in discovery. Confirm that all amounts reconcile across the property-level analyses, the aggregate loss summary, and the supporting exhibits.
12. Proofread Exhibit References and Supporting Schedules. Proofread all exhibit referenc
12. Proofread Exhibit References and Supporting Schedules. Proofread all exhibit references throughout the report body and ensure that every referenced exhibit and supporting schedule is complete, properly labeled, internally consistent, and correctly cross-referenced.
VIII. Timeline and Next Steps
VIII. Timeline and Next Steps The following timeline governs the finalization and service of Dr. Vasquez's expert report, as well as the related milestones in the expert discovery phase of this litigation: Separately, Andrew Fitzpatrick's memorandum reviewing the draft expert report of Jeffrey Caldwell, PE, of Caldwell Engineering Associates Inc. (the engineering/causation expert) is dated September 10, 2023 and is p