Contract analysis
Clause-by-clause risk read on any document of the firm. Pick a contract, or open any document from a matter.
Contract analysis / fairwater-discovery-responses.docx
fairwater-discovery-responses.docx
High · 1
Medium · 2
Standard · 0
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND GENERAL OBJECTIONS
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND GENERAL OBJECTIONS A. Reservation of Rights
1. Fairwater objects to each Interrogatory and Request for Production to the extent it ca
1. Fairwater objects to each Interrogatory and Request for Production to the extent it calls for, seeks, or would require the disclosure of information or documents protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine (including both fact and opinion work product), the common-interest or joint-defense privilege, or any other applicable privilege, protection, or immunity from disclosure recognized und
2. Fairwater's Responses and Objections are based upon information and documents reasonab
2. Fairwater's Responses and Objections are based upon information and documents reasonably available to Fairwater as of the date hereof, after a diligent search and reasonable inquiry. These Responses do not constitute, and shall not be construed as, an admission that any particular document, information, or category of information is relevant to the subject matter of this action, material to any claim or defense, o
3. Fairwater reserves the right to amend, modify, supplement, or correct any or all of th
3. Fairwater reserves the right to amend, modify, supplement, or correct any or all of these Responses and Objections as additional information or documents become available through the ongoing course of discovery, investigation, or otherwise, in accordance with Fairwater's continuing obligations under the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. The fact that Fairwater has responded or agreed to produce documents in respon
4. By responding to any Interrogatory or Request for Production, Fairwater does not waive
4. By responding to any Interrogatory or Request for Production, Fairwater does not waive, and expressly preserves, any objection to the relevance, materiality, competency, admissibility, or discoverability of any information or document provided or identified herein. Fairwater further reserves the right to assert any and all objections, defenses, and privileges at trial, in motions, or in any other proceeding in thi
5. Fairwater's investigation and discovery in this matter are continuing, and these Respo
5. Fairwater's investigation and discovery in this matter are continuing, and these Responses are made without prejudice to Fairwater's right to present additional facts, evidence, or arguments at any future stage of this litigation. B. Objections to Definitions and Instructions
6. Fairwater objects to Ridgemark's Definitions and Instructions accompanying its First S
Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
6. Fairwater objects to Ridgemark's Definitions and Instructions accompanying its First Set of Interrogatories and First Requests for Production to the extent such Definitions and Instructions purport to impose obligations on Fairwater that are greater than, broader than, or inconsistent with the obligations imposed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, including but not limited to Rules 1.280, 1.340, 1.350, and 1
7. Fairwater objects to Ridgemark's use of the phrase "all documents" and similar formula
7. Fairwater objects to Ridgemark's use of the phrase "all documents" and similar formulations (including "any and all documents," "each and every document," and similar language) as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent such language encompasses documents that are not in Fairwater's possession, custody, or control; documents that are equally available to Ridgemark from public records or other sources; docume
8. Fairwater objects to any Definition or Instruction that purports to extend the scope o
8. Fairwater objects to any Definition or Instruction that purports to extend the scope of discovery to time periods beyond those relevant to the claims and defenses at issue in this litigation. The relevant instruments at issue in this declaratory judgment action are the Cross-Parcel Easement recorded June 22, 1998, in Official Records Book 4517, Page 1283, of the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, and the
9. Subject to and without waiving these General Objections, which are incorporated by ref
9. Subject to and without waiving these General Objections, which are incorporated by reference into each specific Response and Objection below as though fully set forth therein, Fairwater responds to Ridgemark's First Set of Interrogatories and First Requests for Production as follows.
II. RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES
High
⚑ Non-compete / exclusivity restraint
II. RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Identify the full legal name, entity type, state of organization, and principal place of business of Defendant Fairwater Real Estate Investment Trust, including the names and titles of its principal officers and any parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entities with an ownership interest in or management responsibility for the property at 4250 Commerce
III. RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
III. RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1: Produce all documents relating to Fairwater's acquisition of the property at 4250 Commerce Park Boulevard, Sanford, FL 32771, including but not limited to the purchase and sale agreement, closing statement, deed, title commitment, title insurance policy, surveys, environmental reports, structural inspection reports, and all other d