FR EA

Contract analysis

Clause-by-clause risk read on any document of the firm. Pick a contract, or open any document from a matter.

Contract analysis / standstill-settlement-agreement-v2.docx
standstill-settlement-agreement-v2.docx
1038-00006 · 39 clauses
High · 8 Medium · 16 Standard · 1
Section 1.1 — Defined Terms. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the High
⚑ Non-compete / exclusivity restraint
Section 1.1 — Defined Terms. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below: "Action" means the civil action styled Cascade Retail Holdings Inc. v. Rathore et al., C.A. No. 2025-0198-MTZ, pending in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware before Vice Chancellor Margaret T. Zhao. "Aldwyn" means Aldwyn Compliance Solutions LLC, an independent compliance consulting firm wit
Section 1.2 — Rules of Construction. For the purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwi
Section 1.2 — Rules of Construction. For the purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided herein or unless the context otherwise requires: (a) the terms "hereof," "herein," "hereto," "hereunder," and similar terms refer to this Agreement as a whole, including all Exhibits and Schedules hereto, and not to any particular Section, Article, Exhibit, or Schedule; (b) references to any Article, Sectio
ARTICLE II — STANDSTILL AND STATUS QUO
ARTICLE II — STANDSTILL AND STATUS QUO
Section 2.1 — Standstill Period. From the Execution Date through the later of (a) the expi High
⚑ Non-compete / exclusivity restraint
Section 2.1 — Standstill Period. From the Execution Date through the later of (a) the expiration of all Modified Non-Compete Periods applicable to the Individual Defendants and (b) the expiration of all Modified Non-Solicitation Periods applicable to the Individual Defendants (such period, the "Standstill Period"), the Parties agree to maintain the status quo as set forth in this Agreement and the Consent Order. Duri
Section 2.2 — Continuation of Consent Interim Order. The Consent Interim Order entered by
Section 2.2 — Continuation of Consent Interim Order. The Consent Interim Order entered by the Court on March 21, 2025, shall remain in full force and effect and shall continue to govern the Parties' conduct until such time as it is superseded by entry of the Consent Order in accordance with Article IX of this Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the terms of the Consent Interim Order and the terms of this
Section 2.3 — Verdana Employment. Subject to and in accordance with the restrictions set f High
⚑ Non-compete / exclusivity restraint
Section 2.3 — Verdana Employment. Subject to and in accordance with the restrictions set forth in Article III of this Agreement and the Consent Order, Verdana may continue to employ each of the Individual Defendants in roles that do not involve, directly or indirectly, any of the Restricted Categories during the applicable Modified Non-Compete Period for each such Individual Defendant. Each Individual Defendant may c
ARTICLE III — MODIFIED RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
ARTICLE III — MODIFIED RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
Section 3.1 — Modified Non-Competition Obligations. High
⚑ Non-compete / exclusivity restraint
Section 3.1 — Modified Non-Competition Obligations. (a) Rathore. Rathore shall be subject to a modified non-competition period of twelve (12) months, commencing on February 7, 2025 (the date of Rathore's resignation from CRH) and expiring on February 6, 2026 (the "Rathore Modified Non-Compete Period"), which represents a reduction from the original eighteen (18)-month non-competition period set forth in the Rathore E
Section 3.2 — Modified Non-Solicitation of Employees. Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
Section 3.2 — Modified Non-Solicitation of Employees. (a) Non-Solicitation Obligation. Each of the eight Individual Defendants agrees to a non-solicitation obligation with respect to employees of CRH for a period of eighteen (18) months, commencing on February 7, 2025 and expiring on August 6, 2026 (the "Modified Non-Solicitation Period (Employees)"). During the Modified Non-Solicitation Period (Employees), no Indivi
Section 3.3 — Modified Non-Solicitation of Vendors. Medium
⚑ Confidentiality undertaking
Section 3.3 — Modified Non-Solicitation of Vendors. (a) Non-Solicitation Obligation. Each of the eight Individual Defendants agrees to a non-solicitation obligation with respect to CRH's Top 50 Vendors (as listed on Exhibit C) for a period of twelve (12) months, commencing on February 7, 2025 and expiring on February 6, 2026 (the "Modified Non-Solicitation Period (Vendors)"). During the Modified Non-Solicitation Peri
Section 3.4 — Confidentiality Obligations. Medium
⚑ Confidentiality undertaking
Section 3.4 — Confidentiality Obligations. (a) Reaffirmation. Each Individual Defendant hereby reaffirms, acknowledges, and agrees to be bound by the perpetual confidentiality obligations contained in his or her respective Employment Agreement, as such obligations are further supplemented and reinforced by this Agreement. The Individual Defendants acknowledge and agree that the confidentiality obligations contained i
Section 3.5 — Superseding Effect. The modified restrictive covenants set forth in this Art Medium
⚑ Confidentiality undertaking
Section 3.5 — Superseding Effect. The modified restrictive covenants set forth in this Article III and in Exhibit A attached hereto supersede the corresponding restrictive covenant provisions of the individual Employment Agreements solely with respect to the duration, scope, and category limitations of the non-competition and non-solicitation obligations. In all other respects, including with respect to the perpetual
Section 3.6 — Court Enforcement. The modified restrictive covenants set forth in this Arti
Section 3.6 — Court Enforcement. The modified restrictive covenants set forth in this Article III shall be incorporated in their entirety into the Consent Order entered by the Court in the Action. Upon entry of the Consent Order, the modified restrictive covenants shall be enforceable by the Court through contempt proceedings, sanctions, and such other equitable remedies as may be available under the laws of the Stat
Section 4.1 — Settlement Payment. Medium
⚑ Forum / governing law
Section 4.1 — Settlement Payment. (a) Amount and Payment. Verdana shall pay to CRH the aggregate sum of Eight Million Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($8,750,000) (the "Settlement Payment") in immediately available funds by wire transfer to a bank account designated by CRH, no later than thirty (30) days following the Execution Date. [Blackhall Comment: Verdana has requested a forty-five (45)-day payment period.
Section 4.2 — Litigation Cost Reimbursement. Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
Section 4.2 — Litigation Cost Reimbursement. (a) Amount and Payment. Verdana shall reimburse CRH the aggregate sum of Four Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($425,000) toward CRH's litigation costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Action, including but not limited to court filing fees, forensic investigation costs, injunction bond premiums, and mediation fees (the "Litigation Cost Reimbursement"). The
Section 4.3 — Equity Forfeitures. Standard
⚑ Commercial term
Section 4.3 — Equity Forfeitures. (a) Rathore RSU Forfeiture. Rathore acknowledges and agrees to the forfeiture of equity in the aggregate amount of Three Hundred Sixty-Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($362,500), consisting of: (i) One Hundred Eighty-One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($181,250) in unvested restricted stock units ("RSUs"), representing the remaining twenty-five percent (25%) unvested tranche of
Section 4.4 — Tax Treatment. Each Party shall be solely responsible for any and all federa High
⚑ Penalty / liquidated damages
Section 4.4 — Tax Treatment. Each Party shall be solely responsible for any and all federal, state, and local tax liabilities, including income taxes, employment taxes, and any applicable penalties or interest, arising from or attributable to the payments received or equity forfeitures made under this Article IV. No Party makes any representation or warranty to any other Party regarding the tax treatment, tax consequ
Section 4.5 — No Admission. The Settlement Payment, Litigation Cost Reimbursement, equity
Section 4.5 — No Admission. The Settlement Payment, Litigation Cost Reimbursement, equity forfeitures, and all other monetary terms and payments set forth in this Article IV are made in compromise and settlement of disputed claims and do not constitute, and shall not be construed as, an admission of liability, fault, wrongdoing, or the validity of any claim or defense by any Party. The Parties acknowledge that this A
ARTICLE V — DATA RETURN AND DESTRUCTION
ARTICLE V — DATA RETURN AND DESTRUCTION
Section 5.1 — Return or Destruction of Exfiltrated Data. High
⚑ Penalty / liquidated damages
Section 5.1 — Return or Destruction of Exfiltrated Data. (a) Obligation. Within ten (10) business days following the Execution Date, each Individual Defendant shall return to CRH, or certify the destruction of, all CRH Confidential Information in such Individual Defendant's possession, custody, or control, including but not limited to the Exfiltrated Data (consisting of approximately 14,327 files totaling approximate
Section 5.2 — Verdana Data Purge. Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
Section 5.2 — Verdana Data Purge. (a) Comprehensive Search and Purge. Verdana shall, within ten (10) business days following the Execution Date, conduct a comprehensive search of all Verdana systems, networks, servers, devices, and repositories (including but not limited to email servers, shared network drives, cloud storage platforms, document management systems, collaboration tools, and any desktop computers, lapto
Section 5.3 — Independent Forensic Audit. Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
Section 5.3 — Independent Forensic Audit. (a) Engagement of Pinnacle Forensics. Verdana shall permit, and shall fully cooperate with, an independent forensic audit of Verdana's systems to be conducted by Pinnacle Forensics LLC (engagement lead: Dr. Rajiv Anand, Principal Forensic Analyst) for the purpose of verifying compliance with the data return and destruction obligations set forth in Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of this
Section 5.4 — Ongoing Obligations. The obligations set forth in this Article V are in addi Medium
⚑ Confidentiality undertaking
Section 5.4 — Ongoing Obligations. The obligations set forth in this Article V are in addition to, and do not limit, modify, or supersede, the perpetual confidentiality obligations set forth in Section 3.4 of this Agreement and the Employment Agreements. The completion of the data return, destruction, and forensic audit processes described in this Article V shall not relieve any Individual Defendant or Verdana of any
ARTICLE VI — INJUNCTION BOND AND TRO DISSOLUTION
ARTICLE VI — INJUNCTION BOND AND TRO DISSOLUTION
Section 6.1 — Dissolution of TRO. Upon entry of the Consent Order by the Court in the Acti High
⚑ Non-compete / exclusivity restraint
Section 6.1 — Dissolution of TRO. Upon entry of the Consent Order by the Court in the Action, the Temporary Restraining Order entered by Vice Chancellor Zhao on March 7, 2025 shall be dissolved and shall be of no further force or effect. The Consent Order shall expressly provide for the dissolution of the TRO and shall supersede the TRO in all respects. The restrictions on the Individual Defendants' conduct shall the
Section 6.2 — Release of Injunction Bond. Promptly following the entry of the Consent Orde
Section 6.2 — Release of Injunction Bond. Promptly following the entry of the Consent Order dissolving the TRO, and in any event within ten (10) business days following such entry, CRH shall submit a written request to Broadview Surety Corp. for the discharge and release of the Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollar ($2,500,000) injunction bond (Bond No. BSC-2025-TRO-04419) posted by CRH in connection with the TRO.
Section 6.3 — No Damages on Bond. Each of the Individual Defendants and Verdana hereby irr Medium
⚑ Forum / governing law
Section 6.3 — No Damages on Bond. Each of the Individual Defendants and Verdana hereby irrevocably waives any and all claims for damages, losses, costs, expenses, or other recovery on the injunction bond arising from or related to the issuance, maintenance, or enforcement of the TRO, including any claims under 10 Del. C. § 3104 or any other provision of applicable law. This waiver shall survive the dissolution of the
ARTICLE VII — COMPLIANCE MONITOR
ARTICLE VII — COMPLIANCE MONITOR
Section 7.1 — Appointment of Compliance Monitor. Medium
⚑ Confidentiality undertaking
Section 7.1 — Appointment of Compliance Monitor. (a) Appointment. The Parties agree to the appointment of Aldwyn Compliance Solutions LLC, located at 1700 Market Street, Suite 2800, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, as the independent Compliance Monitor for a period of twelve (12) months commencing on the Execution Date (the "Monitoring Period"). Aldwyn has been selected by mutual agreement of the Parties following a
Section 7.2 — Scope of Monitoring. Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
Section 7.2 — Scope of Monitoring. (a) Quarterly Verification. The Compliance Monitor shall conduct quarterly verification of compliance by all Individual Defendants and Verdana with: (i) the modified non-competition obligations set forth in Section 3.1 of this Agreement; (ii) the modified non-solicitation obligations set forth in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of this Agreement; and (iii) the data return and destruction oblig
Section 7.3 — Cost Allocation.
Section 7.3 — Cost Allocation. (a) Total Estimated Cost. The total estimated cost of the Compliance Monitor engagement for the twelve (12)-month Monitoring Period is Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000), subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Compliance Monitor Engagement Letter. (b) Allocation. The cost of the Compliance Monitor engagement shall be allocated as follows: Verdana shall be
Section 7.4 — Reports.
Section 7.4 — Reports. (a) Quarterly Reports. The Compliance Monitor shall provide quarterly written reports to CRH (attention: Theresa Yun-Park, General Counsel, Cascade Retail Holdings Inc.) and Verdana (attention: Helen Tsoi, General Counsel, Verdana Commerce Group, Inc.), with copies to all counsel of record in the Action. Each quarterly report shall include: (i) a summary of monitoring activities conducted durin
Section 7.5 — Removal and Replacement. The Compliance Monitor may be removed prior to the Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
Section 7.5 — Removal and Replacement. The Compliance Monitor may be removed prior to the expiration of the Monitoring Period only by (a) the unanimous written agreement of all Parties or (b) an order of the Court upon a showing of cause, including but not limited to a material conflict of interest, a material failure to perform monitoring duties, or a material breach of the Compliance Monitor Engagement Letter. In t
Section 7.6 — Indemnification of Compliance Monitor. The Parties shall jointly and several High
⚑ Indemnity / guarantee obligation
Section 7.6 — Indemnification of Compliance Monitor. The Parties shall jointly and severally indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Aldwyn and its officers, employees, agents, and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising from or related to the good-faith performance of Aldwyn's monitoring duties under t
ARTICLE VIII — REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
ARTICLE VIII — REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Section 8.1 — Mutual Representations. Each Party represents and warrants to each other Par Medium
⚑ Forum / governing law
Section 8.1 — Mutual Representations. Each Party represents and warrants to each other Party, as of the Execution Date, as follows: (a) Power and Authority. Such Party has the full right, power, and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform all of its obligations hereunder. In the case of CRH and Verdana, the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary
Section 8.2 — CRH Representations. CRH represents and warrants to each other Party, as of
Section 8.2 — CRH Representations. CRH represents and warrants to each other Party, as of the Execution Date, as follows: (a) Corporate Authority. CRH has the corporate authority to enter into this Agreement, and the execution and delivery of this Agreement has been authorized by CRH's management, subject to ratification by CRH's Board of Directors. CRH represents that it expects to obtain such Board ratification pro
Section 8.3 — Individual Defendant Representations. Each Individual Defendant represents a Medium
⚑ Liability cap to check against exposure
Section 8.3 — Individual Defendant Representations. Each Individual Defendant represents and warrants to CRH, as of the Execution Date, as follows: (a) Non-Disclosure. Since the date of his or her resignation from CRH on February 7, 2025, such Individual Defendant has not disclosed, transmitted, or otherwise provided any CRH Confidential Information to any person or entity other than Verdana and its officers, directo
Section 8.4 — Verdana Representations. Verdana represents and warrants to CRH, as of the E Medium
⚑ Confidentiality undertaking
Section 8.4 — Verdana Representations. Verdana represents and warrants to CRH, as of the Execution Date, as follows: (a) Non-Use of CRH Confidential Information. Verdana has not used, incorporated, relied upon, or otherwise benefited from any CRH Confidential Information in connection with its business operations, strategic planning, vendor negotiations, product development, or any other aspect of its business, and w