Contract analysis

From: Richard Calloway <rcalloway@cbllaw.com> To: Harrison Wexford <hwexford@calderwoodharkness.com> Cc: Simone Adesanya <sadesanya@cbllaw.com> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 06:47:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Project Nova — Seller's Markup of Draft Stock Purchase Agreement

Thank you for circulating the initial draft of the Stock Purchase Agreement on behalf of Cascade Holdings Group, Inc. It was a thorough and well-organized draft, and we appreciate the effort that went into it. Calloway, Brandt & Loewe LLP has now completed its review on behalf of NovaMart Global Inc., the Selling Stockholders (including Ridgeline Equity Partners, LP and Brindoval Ventures Fund III, LP), and the found

I wanted to flag the following substantive areas where the Sellers have material comments so that you and your team can orient around the key open issues before diving into the document.

We acknowledge the proposed 18% indemnification cap ($216,000,000) in the draft. Respectfully, the Sellers view this as too high for a stock purchase of a well-run private company at this valuation (approximately 8.96x EBITDA). The Sellers propose reducing the general indemnification cap to 12% of the $1,200,000,000 Purchase Price, or $144,000,000. As you know, the R&W insurance policy placed with Meridian Specialty

The draft proposes an 8% escrow ($96,000,000), which the Sellers view as excessive, particularly given the availability of the R&W policy and the $12,000,000 self-insured retention. The Sellers propose reducing the escrow to 5% of the Purchase Price ($60,000,000). As a practical matter, tying up $96,000,000 for 24 months post-closing disproportionately affects the founder stockholders — Julian Reeves (18.5%) and Priy

The Sellers accept the 24-month survival period for general representations and warranties. However, the Sellers want to ensure that (a) the bring-down condition at closing is qualified "in all material respects" rather than requiring strict compliance, and (b) the survival period operates as a hard cutoff — no claims may be asserted after expiration regardless of when the underlying facts giving rise to the claim ar

**4. Interim Operating Covenants (Section 6.01)**

The Sellers believe the draft's interim operating covenants are overly restrictive, particularly the consent thresholds for ordinary-course capital expenditures and new vendor contracts. NovaMart operates 14 fulfillment centers and serves approximately 62,400 active sellers and 9.1 million registered buyers. The business requires meaningful operational flexibility between signing and closing. This is especially impor

We acknowledge the $78,500,000 net working capital target and the $5,000,000 collar. The Sellers' position is that the Working Capital Methodology Agreement must be finalized and attached as an exhibit to the SPA before signing, rather than being left to post-signing negotiation. Additionally, the Sellers propose that any post-closing true-up dispute be resolved by an independent accounting firm mutually selected by

We note the 2.5% forward termination fee ($30,000,000) payable by the Sellers if the SPA is terminated due to Seller breach or NovaMart's acceptance of a Superior Proposal. The Sellers accept the concept of a forward break fee but propose that the trigger for Seller breach be limited to willful and material breach, not any uncured breach, mirroring the standard applicable to the reverse termination fee payable by Cas

**7. Representations and Warranties — Specific Comments**

The Sellers have proposed materiality and knowledge qualifiers in a number of representations, including the following:

- *Compliance with Laws* — proposing an "in all material respects" qualifier. - *Information Furnished to Cascade's Lenders* — the Sellers resist providing a broad representation regarding information furnished to Cornerstone National Bank, N.A. and Caluvori Capital Partners, Inc. in connection with the $750,000,000 Term Loan B. The Sellers were not party to those discussions and are not in a position to stand behind

I also want to note that the Disclosure Schedules are still being prepared by NovaMart (Amanda Trevino and Doug Whitfield are coordinating internally) and will follow under separate cover.

We acknowledge there are approximately 34 contracts with change of control provisions. The Sellers propose that the failure to obtain any individual third-party consent should not constitute a stand-alone closing condition unless the contract is specifically listed on a schedule of "Material Consents." The Sellers propose limiting the Material Consents schedule to 8–10 of the most critical contracts, including the ag

**9. Post-Closing Employment Agreements**

Julian Reeves and Priya Narasimhan have reviewed the draft employment agreements. The Sellers note that the non-compete provisions are overly broad, both in geographic scope and in the definitions of restricted activity, and will need to be narrowed. This is particularly important with respect to Priya Narasimhan, who resides and may work in California, where the enforceability of post-employment non-competes is subj

**10. Stockholder Representative Provisions**

Ridgeline Equity Partners, LP (through Franklin Osei) is designated as Stockholder Representative. The Sellers propose that the Stockholder Representative have authority to settle indemnification claims up to $5,000,000 without further stockholder approval, with claims above that threshold requiring the consent of holders of a majority of the pre-closing NovaMart shares. The Sellers also propose an expense reserve —

Harrison, I would like to propose that we schedule a principals call — you and me, and potentially client representatives (Ted Langford on your side, and Franklin Osei and/or Amanda Trevino on ours) — later this week or early next week to discuss the key commercial points before the teams begin line-by-line negotiations. It may also make sense to include the parties' investment bankers — Hargrove Mead & Co. and Pembe

I am confident that the parties can bridge the open issues and move toward an execution-ready SPA on the timeline contemplated by the February 14, 2025 Letter of Intent. In parallel, Simone Adesanya and Derek Okonkwo can begin scheduling associate-level working sessions on the less contentious provisions to keep things moving.

Please let me know your availability, and we will get something on the calendar.

Richard Calloway Partner Calloway, Brandt & Loewe LLP 600 Travis Street, Suite 4500 Houston, TX 77002 T: (713) 555-8200 E: rcalloway@cbllaw.com

*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law, including attorney-client privileged communications and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemi