FR EA
1007-00006 · Vantage Mobility Systems Corp · Diligence
legal-due-diligence-memorandum.docx DOCUMENT M&A / Corporate
7 / 12 ← → ✕
Contract analysis Extract to table

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT

CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL DUE DILIGENCE MEMORANDUM

PulseLink Telematics, Inc.

Proposed Acquisition by Vantage Mobility Systems Corp. of 100% of the Outstanding Capital Stock of PulseLink Telematics, Inc. Purchase Price: $35,000,000

Prepared by:

CALDERWOOD & HARKNESS LLP 1 International Place, Suite 4100 Boston, Massachusetts 02110

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60606

Date: May __, 2025

Matter Number: 1001-00004

Re: Proposed acquisition by Vantage Mobility Systems Corp. of 100% of the outstanding capital stock of PulseLink Telematics, Inc. — Purchase Price: $35,000,000

This memorandum is protected by the attorney-client privilege and constitutes attorney work product prepared in anticipation of litigation and in connection with the provision of legal advice. This memorandum is strictly confidential and is intended solely for use by the addressees and the individuals listed above. Any distribution, reproduction, or disclosure of this memorandum or its contents to any other person or entity is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of Calderwood & Harkness LLP.

Right-click to update Table of Contents

I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

This memorandum summarizes the key findings of Calderwood & Harkness LLP ("Calderwood & Harkness" or "C&H") arising from our legal due diligence review of PulseLink Telematics, Inc. ("PulseLink," the "Company," or the "Target") in connection with the proposed acquisition by Vantage Mobility Systems Corp. ("Vantage," "VMS," or the "Buyer") of one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of PulseLink (the "Transaction").

Transaction Structure. The Transaction is structured as a stock purchase pursuant to which Vantage will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of PulseLink common stock from the existing stockholders of PulseLink (collectively, the "Sellers") for an aggregate cash purchase price of Thirty-Five Million Dollars ($35,000,000) (the "Purchase Price"), subject to customary post-closing adjustments for net working capital, indebtedness, cash, and transaction expenses. The definitive agreement governing the Transaction will be a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "SPA"). The Transaction is governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.

Transaction Timeline. A non-binding Letter of Intent ("LOI") was executed by the parties on April 25, 2025, and our engagement as Buyer's counsel commenced on April 28, 2025. Calderwood & Harkness was granted access to the virtual data room on May 1, 2025, and our review has been ongoing since that date. The anticipated closing date for the Transaction is June 13, 2025 (the "Closing Date"), subject to satisfaction of all conditions precedent to be set forth in the SPA.

Purpose. The purpose of this memorandum is to identify and assess material legal risks, liabilities, contingencies, and issues that may affect, among other things: (a) the structure of the Transaction; (b) the valuation of PulseLink and the Purchase Price; (c) the scope and specificity of representations and warranties to be made by the Sellers and PulseLink in the SPA; (d) the indemnification provisions and related risk-allocation mechanisms (including escrow and representations and warranties insurance); (e) the conditions to closing; and (f) any pre-closing or post-closing covenants that Vantage should require. This memorandum is intended to provide Vantage's management team, board of directors, financial advisors, and private equity sponsor with a comprehensive overview of the legal landscape surrounding the Target, enabling informed decision-making with respect to the Transaction.

Privilege. This memorandum has been prepared by attorneys at Calderwood & Harkness LLP in their capacity as legal counsel to Vantage Mobility Systems Corp. It constitutes attorney work product prepared in anticipation of the Transaction and in connection with the provision of legal advice. The contents of this memorandum are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine, and should be treated as strictly confidential. Nothing contained herein should be construed as a legal opinion, and the findings and recommendations set forth herein are subject to the limitations and qualifications described in Section II.C below.

II. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

A. Data Room Access and Review Process

Calderwood & Harkness's due diligence review was conducted primarily through the examination of documents and materials made available in a virtual data room administered by PulseLink and hosted on the Thackeray Solutions platform (the "Data Room"). The Data Room was designated under the project code name "Project Beacon." Access to the Data Room was granted to Calderwood & Harkness on May 1, 2025, following execution of customary confidentiality agreements and access protocols.

The Calderwood & Harkness review team consisted of Naomi Petersen, Lead Associate in the firm's Mergers & Acquisitions practice group, and Ryan Kowalski, Working Associate in the Mergers & Acquisitions practice group. The review was conducted under the supervision of Sandra Tung, Responsible Partner in the Mergers & Acquisitions practice group.

The documents and materials uploaded to the Data Room were organized by PulseLink's counsel into the following standard due diligence categories, which formed the framework for our review:

(a) Corporate and organizational documents;

(b) Capitalization records and equity-related agreements;

(c) Material contracts, including customer agreements, supplier agreements, and partnership arrangements;

(d) intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and software licensing;

(e) Employment and employee benefits, including employment agreements, benefit plan documents, and equity incentive plan materials;

(f) Real property, including leases and related documents;

(g) Environmental matters;

(h) Litigation, claims, and proceedings;

(i) Regulatory compliance, including industry-specific regulations, data privacy, and export controls;

(j) Tax matters, including tax returns, correspondence with taxing authorities, and intercompany tax-related agreements;

(k) Insurance policies and coverage summaries; and

(l) Financial information, including audited financial statements, management accounts, and projections.

As of the date of this memorandum, the Data Room contained approximately 1,247 documents across these categories. We have reviewed each document uploaded to the Data Room, and our findings are summarized in the sections that follow. In addition to the Data Room materials, we reviewed supplemental documents and information provided directly by PulseLink management and by PulseLink's outside counsel, Whitfield, Draper & Colón LLP, in response to our supplemental due diligence requests.

B. Coordination with Other Advisors

Calderwood & Harkness's legal due diligence review has been conducted in coordination with the following advisors engaged by or on behalf of Vantage in connection with the Transaction:

Financial Due Diligence. Financial and accounting due diligence has been conducted by Mercer Peak Advisors LLC, Vantage's financial advisor, under the direction of Allison Tanaka, Managing Director. Our legal findings have been cross-referenced with Mercer Peak's financial diligence workstreams, and we have exchanged information on matters of overlapping relevance, including material contract economics, employee compensation data, and contingent liabilities.

Tax Due Diligence. Tax due diligence, including the analysis of the proposed election under Internal Revenue Code Section 338(h)(10), has been coordinated with Greystone & Callahan LLP, Vantage's tax advisor, under the direction of Samuel Breck, Tax Partner. Greystone & Callahan is preparing a separate Section 338(h)(10) Election Memorandum that addresses the tax implications of the Transaction in detail. Our legal findings relating to tax matters are summarized herein at a high level, and we have deferred to Greystone & Callahan on all technical tax questions.

Independent Auditor. PulseLink's audited financial statements for fiscal years 2022 through 2024 were prepared by Hargrove & Lindt CPAs LLP, PulseLink's independent auditor. We have relied on Mercer Peak's review and analysis of the audited financial statements for purposes of this memorandum.

Representations and Warranties Insurance. The placement of a buy-side representations and warranties insurance policy for the Transaction is being coordinated with Resolute Underwriting Group, Inc. (Dana Kirkwood, Senior Vice President), which is acting as the insurance broker. An application for R&W insurance was submitted on May 8, 2025, to Northshore Indemnity Insurance Co. as the proposed carrier. Our diligence findings have been shared with Resolute and the underwriting team at Northshore to facilitate the underwriting process.

Sellers' Counsel. The Sellers are represented by Whitfield, Draper & Colón LLP ("WDC"), with Catherine Okafor serving as Lead Partner and Michael Brannan serving as Lead Associate. We have coordinated with WDC on the population and organization of the Data Room, responses to our supplemental due diligence requests, and the preparation and negotiation of the SPA and ancillary transaction documents. The first draft of the SPA was delivered to WDC on May 14, 2025.

C. Limitations and Qualifications

The findings and recommendations set forth in this memorandum are subject to the following limitations and qualifications, which should be carefully considered by Vantage and its advisors in evaluating the conclusions herein:

Scope of Review. Our review has been limited to the documents and information made available to us in the Project Beacon Data Room, supplemental materials provided by PulseLink management and by WDC in response to our due diligence requests, and publicly available information. We have not conducted any independent factual investigation beyond the review of these materials, nor have we performed any physical inspections of PulseLink's facilities or assets.

Reliance on Management Representations. Except where otherwise noted, we have relied on the accuracy and completeness of the factual representations made by PulseLink's management, officers, and directors, as well as the representations made by WDC on behalf of the Sellers. We have not independently verified these representations. The SPA will contain comprehensive representations and warranties by the Sellers and PulseLink that are intended to provide contractual assurance regarding the accuracy of the information provided during the due diligence process, together with indemnification obligations and other remedies for any breach thereof.

Not a Legal Opinion. This memorandum does not constitute, and should not be construed as, a legal opinion of Calderwood & Harkness LLP on any matter addressed herein. The conclusions and recommendations set forth herein are based on our professional judgment as of the date hereof and are subject to change based on further review, additional information, or changes in applicable law.

Tax Matters. Tax matters are addressed in this memorandum at a summary level only. The detailed analysis of tax-related diligence findings, including the mechanics and implications of the proposed Section 338(h)(10) election, is set forth in the Section 338(h)(10) Election Memorandum prepared jointly by Calderwood & Harkness and Greystone & Callahan LLP, which is being delivered to Vantage under separate cover.

Foreign Law Matters. Certain matters relating to the Mexican subsidiary, Soluciones PulseLink de México, S. de R.L. de C.V., may implicate Mexican law, including Mexican corporate law, labor law, tax law, and intellectual property law. Calderwood & Harkness is not licensed to practice law in Mexico, and our observations regarding Mexican law matters are based on our general understanding and should not be relied upon as legal advice regarding Mexican law. We recommend engagement of qualified Mexican counsel to provide definitive guidance on these matters.

III. CORPORATE ORGANIZATION AND GOOD STANDING

A. PulseLink Telematics, Inc.

PulseLink Telematics, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. The following summarizes the key organizational details of PulseLink based on our review of its corporate records:

Certificate of Incorporation. We reviewed the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended to date (the "Charter"). The Charter contains standard provisions for a Delaware corporation. We did not identify any unusual charter protections, supermajority voting requirements, anti-takeover provisions (other than standard protections under Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law), or other provisions that would impede or complicate the Transaction. The Charter authorizes one class of capital stock — common stock — as discussed in greater detail in Section IV below.

Bylaws. We reviewed the Company's Bylaws, as amended and restated to date. The Bylaws contain standard provisions governing the management and operations of the Company, including provisions relating to meetings of stockholders and directors, election and removal of directors, appointment of officers, indemnification of directors and officers, and amendments to the Bylaws. The Board of Directors consists of five (5) members, including Graham Ellersick (Founder and CEO) and one designee of Clearwater Ventures II, L.P., PulseLink's Series A investor. We did not identify any provisions in the Bylaws that would impede or complicate the Transaction.

Board and Officer Composition. Based on our review of the corporate minutes and organizational documents, the current Board of Directors and executive officers of PulseLink are as follows:

Board of Directors:

• Graham Ellersick (Chairman)

• Clearwater Ventures Designee (name to be confirmed)

• Three additional directors (names to be confirmed from corporate minutes)

Executive Officers:

• Graham Ellersick, Chief Executive Officer

• Priya Chandrasekaran, Chief Technology Officer

• Nathan Vosburg, Chief Operating Officer

Good Standing. As a condition to closing, we will require delivery of certificates of good standing (or equivalent) for PulseLink from (a) the Delaware Secretary of State (state of incorporation) and (b) the Ohio Secretary of State (state of principal office). These certificates are included in the closing deliverables schedule and should be dated no more than five (5) business days prior to the Closing Date.

Foreign Qualifications. PulseLink has represented that it is qualified to do business as a foreign corporation in the State of Ohio (where its principal office is located) and the State of Michigan (where it maintains customer-facing operations in connection with its OEM supply relationships). We recommend confirming PulseLink's qualification status in all states where it conducts business, including any states where it has remote employees. A failure to qualify in a required jurisdiction could result in penalties, inability to enforce contracts in that jurisdiction, and potential tax exposure. Any identified foreign qualification gaps should be remedied prior to closing or promptly thereafter, and should be disclosed in the Disclosure Schedules to the SPA.

B. Subsidiary — Soluciones PulseLink de México, S. de R.L. de C.V.

PulseLink has one subsidiary: Soluciones PulseLink de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the "Mexican Subsidiary"), a limited liability company of variable capital organized under the laws of Mexico and domiciled in Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico. The key organizational details of the Mexican Subsidiary are as follows:

Ownership Structure. PulseLink holds ninety-nine percent (99%) of the equity interests (partes sociales) in the Mexican Subsidiary. The remaining one percent (1%) is held by Graham Ellersick, PulseLink's Founder and CEO, as is customary under Mexican corporate law, which requires a minimum of two members (socios) for an S. de R.L. de C.V. entity. This 1% interest held by Ellersick is nominal and was established solely for compliance with Mexican corporate law requirements. We recommend that Ellersick's 1% interest be transferred to PulseLink (or to a Vantage-designated entity) at or prior to closing, or alternatively that a mechanism be established in the SPA to ensure that this interest is transferred promptly following closing, to avoid any potential complications regarding beneficial ownership of the Mexican Subsidiary.

Intercompany Engineering Services Agreement. The Mexican Subsidiary provides embedded firmware engineering and software development services to PulseLink (the parent company) pursuant to an Intercompany Engineering Services Agreement (the "Intercompany Agreement"). We reviewed the Intercompany Agreement and note that the terms therein may not reflect arm's-length pricing, which could create transfer pricing exposure for both PulseLink and the Mexican Subsidiary. We recommend that the Intercompany Agreement be restructured on arm's-length terms following closing to ensure compliance with applicable transfer pricing regulations in both the United States and Mexico. This matter is being reviewed in coordination with Greystone & Callahan LLP.

Risk Items:

(i) Transfer Pricing. The current Intercompany Agreement may not satisfy the arm's-length standard under U.S. Treasury Regulations (Section 482) and Mexican transfer pricing rules. Failure to comply with transfer pricing requirements could result in adjustments by the IRS or the Mexican Servicio de Administración Tributaria (SAT), potentially leading to double taxation, penalties, and interest. We recommend post-closing restructuring of the Intercompany Agreement with the assistance of qualified transfer pricing advisors.

(ii) Mexican Labor Law Compliance. The Mexican Subsidiary employs 28 individuals and is subject to the Mexican Federal Labor Law (Ley Federal del Trabajo). We recommend an independent review of the Mexican Subsidiary's compliance with mandatory employee benefits, including the annual profit-sharing obligation (Participación de los Trabajadores en las Utilidades, or "PTU"), social security contributions (IMSS/INFONAVIT), and other statutory requirements. Non-compliance could result in material liabilities and employer penalties.

(iii) FCPA Compliance. The operation of a subsidiary in Mexico creates potential exposure under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"). We address this matter further in Section X.D below.

C. No Other Subsidiaries or Affiliates

PulseLink has represented and confirmed, through both management representations and the Data Room materials, that it has no subsidiaries, joint ventures, partnerships, or other affiliate entities other than Soluciones PulseLink de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. We have not identified any evidence to the contrary in our review. This representation should be included in the SPA, and any inaccuracy therein should be subject to indemnification as a breach of a Fundamental Representation.

IV. CAPITALIZATION

A. Authorized Capital Stock

Pursuant to PulseLink's Certificate of Incorporation, the total authorized capital stock of the Company consists of Ten Million (10,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the "Common Stock"). The Charter does not authorize any class of preferred stock or any other class or series of capital stock. This single-class capital structure simplifies the Transaction, as there are no liquidation preferences, conversion rights, or other preferential rights associated with a separate class of preferred stock that would need to be addressed in the stock purchase mechanics.

B. Issued and Outstanding Shares

Based on our review of the Company's stock ledger, capitalization records, and representations made by PulseLink management, the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this memorandum is Seven Million Four Hundred Eighty Thousand (7,480,000) shares. There is no preferred stock issued or outstanding. There are no shares held in treasury. Accordingly, the aggregate number of shares to be acquired by Vantage in the Transaction is 7,480,000 shares, representing 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of PulseLink.

C. Stockholder Schedule

The following table sets forth the current stockholders of PulseLink, the number of shares of Common Stock held by each, and each stockholder's percentage ownership of the Company:

The detailed capitalization table, including the names and share counts for each of the stockholders included within the "Remaining holders" category, is set forth in Appendix B to this memorandum. All stockholders will be parties to the SPA as Sellers, either directly or through the exercise of the drag-along provisions described in Section IV.E below.

D. Stock Option Plan and Warrants

PulseLink maintains an equity incentive plan (the "Equity Incentive Plan") pursuant to which stock options and other equity awards have been granted to employees and consultants. As of the date of this memorandum, we are confirming the status of all outstanding options under the Equity Incentive Plan. It is anticipated that all outstanding stock options will either be exercised by the holders thereof prior to closing, or will be cancelled and cashed out at closing (with the holders receiving the excess, if any, of the per-share purchase price over the applicable exercise price, less any applicable withholding taxes). The Equity Incentive Plan is expected to be terminated at or prior to closing in connection with the Transaction.

We have not identified any outstanding warrants, convertible notes, convertible securities, subscription agreements, or other instruments or rights to acquire equity interests in PulseLink, other than the options issued under the Equity Incentive Plan. Based on the foregoing, and assuming all outstanding options are exercised or cancelled prior to closing, the fully diluted share count of PulseLink as of the Closing Date will be 7,480,000 shares, with no dilutive securities remaining outstanding.

SPA Protection. We recommend that the capitalization representation in the SPA be classified as a "Fundamental Representation" with a survival period of sixty (60) months following closing and an indemnification cap equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Purchase Price ($35,000,000). The capitalization representation should include comprehensive warranties regarding the accuracy of the capitalization table, the absence of any additional issued or outstanding securities, the absence of any options, warrants, or other rights to acquire equity (other than as disclosed), and the valid issuance, full payment, and non-assessability of all outstanding shares.

E. Stockholders' Agreement / Voting Agreement

PulseLink is party to a Stockholders' Agreement dated as of 2018 (the "Stockholders' Agreement") among PulseLink, Graham Ellersick, Clearwater Ventures II, L.P., Priya Chandrasekaran, Nathan Vosburg, and certain other stockholders. We reviewed the Stockholders' Agreement in its entirety and note the following key provisions:

Drag-Along Rights. The Stockholders' Agreement contains a drag-along provision pursuant to which the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (the "Dragging Stockholders") may compel all other stockholders (the "Dragged Stockholders") to participate in a sale of 100% of the Company's outstanding stock to a third-party acquirer, on the same terms and conditions as the Dragging Stockholders. Graham Ellersick, holding 43.98% of the outstanding shares, together with any one of the other major stockholders, would constitute a majority sufficient to exercise the drag-along provision. We understand that Ellersick, in conjunction with Clearwater Ventures II, L.P. (holding 25.00%), intends to exercise the drag-along right to compel all stockholders to sell their shares in the Transaction. Together, these two stockholders hold 68.98% of the outstanding shares, exceeding the majority threshold required for drag-along. We recommend confirming that all procedural requirements for the exercise of the drag-along right (including notice requirements, timing, and form) are satisfied in accordance with the terms of the Stockholders' Agreement.

Tag-Along Rights. The Stockholders' Agreement also contains tag-along rights in favor of minority stockholders. These rights are not implicated in the present Transaction because all stockholders will participate in the sale of 100% of the Company's outstanding stock (whether voluntarily or pursuant to the drag-along provision).

No Voting Agreements or Proxies. We have not identified any voting agreements, irrevocable proxies, or other arrangements that would impede the Transaction or restrict the ability of any stockholder to sell its shares in the Transaction.

F. Transfer Restrictions

All stock certificates representing shares of PulseLink Common Stock bear customary restrictive legends, including (a) a legend regarding restrictions on transfer under applicable federal and state securities laws (reflecting the fact that the shares were issued in private transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended), and (b) a legend referencing the transfer restrictions set forth in the Stockholders' Agreement. At closing, the Sellers will deliver their stock certificates to Vantage (or to the escrow agent, to the extent applicable), duly endorsed in blank or accompanied by duly executed stock powers, with all restrictive legends removed or waived. We recommend that the SPA include a covenant requiring PulseLink to cause the removal of all restrictive legends and the delivery of replacement certificates (or appropriate evidence of book-entry transfer) at closing.

V. MATERIAL CONTRACTS

A. Overview

We reviewed all contracts identified as material to PulseLink's operations, as disclosed in the Data Room and as identified by PulseLink management in response to our due diligence requests. For purposes of this memorandum, we focused our review on the following categories of material contracts: (a) customer agreements generating annual revenue in excess of $1,000,000; (b) supplier agreements involving annual expenditures in excess of $500,000 or involving single-source dependencies; (c) real property leases; (d) intercompany agreements; (e) technology licenses; and (f) any other contracts containing change-of-control, assignment, or consent provisions that could be triggered by the Transaction. A complete summary of all material contracts reviewed is set forth in Appendix C to this memorandum.

B. Customer Contracts

1. Supply Agreement — Meridian Automotive Group, Inc.

Key Terms. The Meridian Supply Agreement is PulseLink's largest customer contract by revenue and is a critical commercial relationship for the Company. The agreement provides for the supply of PulseCore® embedded telematics control units to Meridian for integration into Meridian's vehicle platforms. Key commercial terms include volume commitments by Meridian (subject to periodic forecasting and adjustment), pricing adjustment mechanisms tied to component cost indices and annual volume thresholds, detailed quality standards and inspection procedures conforming to IATF 16949 automotive quality management standards, and warranty provisions covering defects in materials and workmanship for a period of thirty-six (36) months from the date of delivery to Meridian. The agreement also includes a termination for convenience provision that permits either party to terminate the agreement upon one hundred eighty (180) days' prior written notice.

Change-of-Control Provision. The Meridian Supply Agreement contains a change-of-control provision that requires PulseLink to provide Meridian with thirty (30) days' prior written notice of any change of control of PulseLink. The agreement does not require Meridian's consent to the Transaction, but it does grant Meridian a right to terminate the agreement within sixty (60) days following receipt of such notice if the acquirer is a "direct competitor" of Meridian (as defined in the agreement). Based on our review of the definition of "direct competitor" and the nature of Vantage's business, we have concluded that Vantage is not a direct competitor of Meridian, and accordingly the risk that Meridian would exercise its termination right in connection with the Transaction is low. However, the required notice must be delivered in accordance with the terms of the agreement, and we recommend that such notice be delivered promptly following execution of the SPA or at such other time as is commercially appropriate.

Risk Level: Low-to-moderate. This is PulseLink's largest customer contract and represents a significant portion of the Company's revenue. We recommend that the SPA include a specific representation by the Sellers regarding the absence of any termination threats, material disputes, or pending defaults under this agreement.

2. Supply Agreement — Trident Motor Corporation

Key Terms. The Trident Supply Agreement is PulseLink's second-largest customer contract by revenue. The agreement provides for the supply of telematics modules and V2X (vehicle-to-everything) data bridge hardware to Trident for integration into Trident's vehicle platforms. The commercial terms are similar in structure to the Meridian agreement, including volume commitments, pricing mechanisms, quality standards, and warranty provisions. Notably, the Trident agreement also includes a product liability indemnification provision pursuant to which PulseLink indemnifies Trident against claims arising from defects in PulseLink's products. This indemnification obligation is uncapped and survives the termination of the agreement, which is standard for automotive supply agreements but represents a potential exposure that should be monitored.

Change-of-Control Provision. The Trident Supply Agreement contains a more restrictive change-of-control provision than the Meridian agreement. Specifically, the Trident agreement requires Trident's prior written consent to any "assignment by operation of law or otherwise" or any "change of control" of PulseLink. The agreement defines "change of control" broadly to include any transaction resulting in a change in the majority ownership or voting control of PulseLink. A stock acquisition by Vantage of 100% of PulseLink's outstanding shares would constitute a change of control under this definition and would therefore require Trident's prior written consent.

Risk Item — Moderate. The requirement to obtain Trident's written consent is a significant risk item for the Transaction. The Trident Supply Agreement represents approximately $8,700,000 in annual contract value and is PulseLink's second-largest customer relationship. Moreover, the agreement has a relatively short remaining term, expiring on June 30, 2026, with a two-year renewal option that is exercisable only by mutual agreement of the parties. The consent process could create friction with the renewal discussions, and a refusal by Trident to grant consent could have material adverse consequences for the Company's revenue base and for the value of the Transaction to Vantage.

We recommend that obtaining Trident's written consent be included as either (a) a condition precedent to Vantage's obligation to close, or (b) a pre-closing deliverable to be obtained by the Sellers prior to the Closing Date. In the event that Trident's consent cannot be obtained prior to closing, we recommend that the SPA include a specific indemnification obligation of the Sellers for any losses arising from the failure to obtain such consent, including but not limited to lost revenue, contract termination damages, and costs of procuring replacement business. This matter should also be disclosed to Northshore Indemnity Insurance Co. in connection with the R&W insurance underwriting process.

3. Software Licensing & Services Agreement — Cascade Fleet Solutions LLC

Key Terms. The Cascade agreement governs the license of PulseLink's FleetIQ® analytics platform to Cascade Fleet Solutions on a software-as-a-service (SaaS) basis, together with related implementation, integration, and ongoing support services. Key terms include monthly subscription fees, service level commitments (including a 99.5% uptime guarantee), data security and privacy obligations (including requirements regarding encryption, access controls, and data breach notification), and a mutual limitation of liability. The limitation of liability provision caps each party's liability at an amount equal to the aggregate fees paid by Cascade in the twelve (12) months preceding the claim, subject to customary carve-outs for indemnification obligations, willful misconduct, and breaches of confidentiality.

Change-of-Control Provision. We did not identify any change-of-control, consent, or assignment provision in the Cascade agreement that would be triggered by the Transaction.

Risk Level: Low. The Cascade agreement is on standard SaaS terms and does not present any material risks in connection with the Transaction.

C. Lease Agreement — Dublin, Ohio Principal Office

Key Terms. The Dublin office lease is structured as a triple-net lease (NNN), under which PulseLink is responsible for its proportionate share of property taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance charges in addition to base rent. The lease provides for an annual base rent escalation of three percent (3%). A tenant improvement allowance was provided by the landlord and has been fully utilized. We did not identify any renewal options in the lease.

Assignment / Change-of-Control. The lease requires the landlord's prior written consent for any assignment or subletting of the lease by the tenant. While a stock acquisition does not technically constitute an assignment of the lease (as the tenant entity — PulseLink — remains the same), we note that the lease includes a broadly drafted definition of "transfer" that may encompass a change of control of the tenant entity. Specifically, the lease defines "transfer" to include "any change in the ownership or control of Tenant, whether by sale, merger, consolidation, or other reorganization, that results in a change in the identity of the persons or entities controlling Tenant." The acquisition of 100% of PulseLink's stock by Vantage would arguably constitute such a "transfer" under this definition.

Risk Item — Low-to-Moderate. While the risk of a landlord asserting a default under this provision is generally low in the context of a commercial office lease, we recommend obtaining a consent or waiver from Kellner Park Holdings LLC prior to closing to eliminate any ambiguity. The lease has a remaining term of approximately four years (through August 31, 2029), and a default claim by the landlord could disrupt PulseLink's operations at its principal office. We recommend including landlord consent as either a closing condition or a pre-closing covenant in the SPA.

D. Engineering Services Agreement — Soluciones PulseLink de México, S. de R.L. de C.V.

The Intercompany Engineering Services Agreement between PulseLink and its Mexican Subsidiary governs the provision of embedded firmware engineering and software development services from the Guadalajara engineering center to PulseLink. The agreement sets forth the scope of services, service levels, and compensation payable to the Mexican Subsidiary for its engineering work. As noted in Section III.B above, the current terms of the Intercompany Agreement may not reflect arm's-length pricing, and we recommend restructuring the agreement on arm's-length terms following closing to ensure compliance with transfer pricing regulations under both U.S. and Mexican law. This matter is being reviewed in coordination with Greystone & Callahan LLP.

E. Other Contracts Reviewed

In addition to the contracts described above, we reviewed the following categories of contracts in the Data Room:

Non-Disclosure Agreements. Various non-disclosure agreements executed by PulseLink with OEM prospects, potential partners, and other third parties. We did not identify any unusual provisions or restrictions that would be material to the Transaction.

Component Supply Agreements. PulseLink has entered into supply agreements with third-party semiconductor and hardware component vendors for the sourcing of components used in the manufacture of PulseCore® TCUs and related products. We reviewed these agreements and did not identify any single-source dependencies that would be critical to PulseLink's operations, nor any provisions that would be triggered by the Transaction. The component supply chain appears to be reasonably diversified across multiple vendors.

Software Development Tool Licenses. PulseLink licenses various software development tools, integrated development environments, and related software under standard commercial license agreements. We did not identify any material issues with these licenses.

Insurance Policies. PulseLink's insurance policies are discussed in Section XI below.

F. Recommended SPA Protections — Material Contracts

Based on our review of PulseLink's material contracts, we recommend the following protections in the SPA:

(i) Comprehensive representations by the Sellers regarding: (a) the identification and disclosure of all material contracts; (b) the enforceability of all material contracts in accordance with their terms; (c) the absence of any defaults (or events that, with the giving of notice or lapse of time, would constitute defaults) under any material contract; and (d) the absence of any termination threats, disputes, or claims relating to any material contract.

(ii) A consent deliverable schedule identifying all contracts that require third-party consent in connection with the Transaction, including at a minimum (a) the Trident Motor Corporation Supply Agreement and (b) the Kellner Park Holdings LLC lease (to the extent landlord consent is deemed necessary). The SPA should include a condition precedent to Vantage's obligation to close requiring delivery of all material consents, or alternatively a covenant of the Sellers to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such consents.

(iii) Specific indemnification by the Sellers for any losses arising from (a) the failure to obtain required consents, (b) any breach or default under a material contract arising from pre-closing events or the consummation of the Transaction, and (c) any claims by counterparties under material contracts relating to pre-closing events.

VI. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

A. Patents

PulseLink's patent portfolio consists of four (4) issued United States utility patents and two (2) pending United States utility patent applications. The issued patents cover core innovations in PulseLink's telematics hardware platform, including:

(i) Telematics control unit (TCU) architecture and system design;

(ii) Integrated antenna design for embedded telematics applications;

(iii) Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication protocols and methods; and

(iv) Power management systems and methods for embedded telematics hardware.

The two pending patent applications are continuation applications relating to next-generation TCU designs currently under development by PulseLink's engineering team. These applications are in prosecution at the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") and are being handled by PulseLink's patent counsel. We reviewed the prosecution files for both applications and did not identify any material issues that would threaten their patentability.

All four issued patents and both pending applications are owned solely by PulseLink Telematics, Inc. We did not identify any co-ownership, joint inventorship, or other shared rights issues that would complicate PulseLink's exclusive ownership of its patent portfolio. Patent assignments from each named inventor have been reviewed and confirmed via executed invention assignment agreements (discussed further in Section VI.F below).

We did not identify any pending or threatened patent infringement claims against PulseLink, nor any inter partes review proceedings, post-grant review proceedings, or other challenges to any of PulseLink's patents before the USPTO or any court. Similarly, we did not identify any claims by PulseLink against third parties for infringement of PulseLink's patents.

A complete inventory of PulseLink's patent portfolio, including patent numbers, filing dates, issue dates, expiration dates, and brief descriptions, is set forth in Appendix D to this memorandum.

B. Trademarks

PulseLink maintains a portfolio of twelve (12) registered United States trademarks with the USPTO, covering the Company's key brands, product names, and design marks. The principal trademark registrations include:

• PulseCore® — registered for telematics hardware products, including embedded telematics control units and related components;

• FleetIQ® — registered for fleet analytics software platform and related SaaS services;

• PulseLink Telematics® — registered for the Company's corporate name and overall brand identity; and

• Various additional design marks and product-line marks covering specific product offerings and visual branding elements.

All twelve trademark registrations are current, and all required maintenance filings (including Sections 8 and 15 declarations and Section 9 renewals, as applicable) have been timely filed. We did not identify any pending opposition or cancellation proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") or any other tribunal, nor any third-party claims of trademark infringement or dilution.

C. Copyrights and Trade Secrets

PulseLink's proprietary software assets include the embedded firmware for the PulseCore® TCU product line and the full codebase for the FleetIQ® SaaS analytics platform. These software assets represent significant intellectual property value and are protected primarily through trade secret protections, including confidentiality agreements, access controls, and internal information security policies.

We did not identify any formal copyright registrations filed with the United States Copyright Office for PulseLink's software or other copyrightable works. The absence of copyright registrations is common among software companies, as copyright protection under U.S. law arises automatically upon creation of an original work of authorship fixed in a tangible medium. However, copyright registration provides important enforcement benefits, including the ability to seek statutory damages and attorney's fees in infringement actions. We recommend that Vantage consider filing voluntary copyright registrations for PulseLink's key software works (including the PulseCore® firmware and the FleetIQ® platform codebase) following closing to enhance the enforceability of PulseLink's copyright protections.

D. Domain Names

PulseLink's primary internet domain name is www.pulselinktelematics.com, which is registered to PulseLink Telematics, Inc. We reviewed the domain registration records and confirmed that the domain is current and properly registered in PulseLink's name. We did not identify any pending domain name disputes, Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings, or other claims relating to PulseLink's domain names.

In addition to the primary domain, we reviewed several product-related and marketing-related domain names registered to PulseLink. All such domains are properly registered in PulseLink's name, and no material issues were identified.

E. Open-Source Software

Our intellectual property due diligence included a review of PulseLink's use of open-source software in its proprietary codebase. Open-source software is a significant area of focus in technology company due diligence, given the potential for certain open-source licenses (particularly "copyleft" or "viral" licenses such as the GNU General Public License, or "GPL") to require disclosure of proprietary source code or to impose other restrictions on the use and distribution of derivative works.

Finding. Based on our review of the Data Room materials, including PulseLink's software bill of materials (SBOM) and open-source usage records, we did not identify any open-source license contamination in PulseLink's proprietary codebase. PulseLink utilizes certain permissive open-source libraries licensed under the MIT License and the Apache License 2.0, both of which permit use, modification, and distribution of the licensed software in proprietary applications, subject to limited attribution and notice requirements. PulseLink has represented that it has complied with the applicable terms of all open-source licenses used in its products. Critically, we did not identify any use of software licensed under the GPL, LGPL (GNU Lesser General Public License), AGPL (Affero General Public License), or any other copyleft license in PulseLink's proprietary code, and accordingly we did not identify any risk that PulseLink's proprietary source code would be required to be disclosed or licensed under open-source terms.

PulseLink maintains an internal open-source usage policy that governs the approval, tracking, and management of open-source software within the Company's development processes. A copy of this policy was reviewed in the Data Room. We recommend that Vantage review and, if appropriate, enhance this policy following closing to ensure ongoing compliance with open-source license terms as PulseLink's software products continue to evolve.

F. IP Assignments and Employee Agreements

We reviewed PulseLink's standard Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement ("CIIAA"), which is executed by all employees and independent contractors engaged in technical or creative work. The CIIAA contains standard provisions assigning to PulseLink all rights, title, and interest in and to any inventions, works of authorship, trade secrets, and other intellectual property created by the employee or contractor in the scope of their engagement with the Company. The CIIAA also contains confidentiality obligations and post-termination restrictions on the use and disclosure of PulseLink's confidential information.

We confirmed that CIIAAs have been executed by all key personnel, including:

• Graham Ellersick (Founder & CEO)

• Priya Chandrasekaran (CTO)

• Nathan Vosburg (COO)

• All U.S.-based engineering team members

With respect to the Guadalajara-based engineers employed through Soluciones PulseLink de México, we reviewed the Mexican-law employment agreements executed by those employees, which contain IP assignment provisions governed by Mexican law. We note that the enforceability of IP assignment provisions under Mexican law may differ from U.S. law, and we recommend independent confirmation of the enforceability of these provisions by qualified Mexican IP counsel. Under Mexican law, certain types of intellectual property created by employees in the course of their employment may be subject to statutory provisions regarding ownership, and it is important to confirm that PulseLink's (or the Mexican Subsidiary's) IP assignment provisions are consistent with these requirements.

G. Recommended SPA Protections — IP

Based on our review of PulseLink's intellectual property portfolio, we recommend the following protections in the SPA:

(i) Comprehensive representations by the Sellers regarding: (a) PulseLink's sole and exclusive ownership of all intellectual property material to its business, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; (b) the absence of any infringement or misappropriation by PulseLink of any third-party intellectual property rights; (c) the absence of any infringement or misappropriation by any third party of PulseLink's intellectual property rights (to the knowledge of the Sellers); (d) the absence of any open-source license contamination in PulseLink's proprietary codebase; (e) the validity and enforceability of all patents, trademarks, and other registered intellectual property; and (f) the execution of CIIAAs or equivalent agreements by all employees and contractors who have contributed to the development of PulseLink's intellectual property.

(ii) IP representations should survive for the general eighteen (18) month representation survival period. However, given the significance of intellectual property to PulseLink's business, Vantage should consider extending the survival period for key IP ownership representations to align with the Fundamental Representation survival period of sixty (60) months.

(iii) Specific indemnification by the Sellers for any losses arising from intellectual property infringement claims relating to pre-closing activities, including claims alleging that PulseLink's products or services infringe any third-party patent, copyright, trademark, or trade secret rights.

VII. EMPLOYMENT AND KEY-PERSON MATTERS

A. Employee Headcount and Locations

PulseLink has a total of one hundred thirty-seven (137) employees distributed across the following locations:

The Dublin headquarters houses PulseLink's executive leadership, engineering (hardware and software), sales, marketing, customer support, finance, and administrative functions. The Guadalajara engineering center is focused on embedded firmware development and certain software development functions. The twenty remote employees are distributed across various U.S. states, performing primarily engineering, sales, and customer support functions. We recommend verification of the specific states in which remote employees are located, as this may affect foreign qualification requirements, employment law compliance, and state tax obligations.

B. Key-Person Arrangements (Post-Closing)

The retention of key personnel is critical to the success of the Transaction and the continued operation of PulseLink's business following the closing. Accordingly, the SPA will include, as conditions precedent to closing, the execution of employment agreements and/or retention agreements with the following key individuals:

1. Graham Ellersick — Founder & CEO

Graham Ellersick is the founder of PulseLink and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since the Company's inception in 2016. Ellersick is the single largest stockholder, holding 3,290,000 shares (43.98%) of PulseLink Common Stock. Following closing, Ellersick will serve as President of the PulseLink division within the Vantage organization, with responsibility for overseeing the continued growth and operation of PulseLink's business.

Post-Closing Employment Agreement. The parties have negotiated a two (2) year employment agreement for Ellersick with an annual base salary of $340,000, plus eligibility for a performance-based annual bonus to be determined in accordance with Vantage's standard executive bonus program. The employment agreement will include customary terms regarding duties, reporting relationships, benefits eligibility, and termination provisions.

Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement. Ellersick will execute a Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement with a restrictive period of two (2) years following the Closing Date, covering competition in the telematics, connected vehicle, and fleet analytics industries, as well as solicitation of PulseLink's employees, customers, and business partners.

Sellers' Representative. Ellersick will serve as the Sellers' Representative under the SPA, authorized to act on behalf of all Sellers with respect to post-closing matters, including the working capital true-up process, indemnification claims, and escrow releases.

2. Priya Chandrasekaran — CTO

Priya Chandrasekaran serves as PulseLink's Chief Technology Officer and is the architect of PulseLink's core technology, including the PulseCore® firmware and the FleetIQ® analytics platform. Chandrasekaran holds 748,000 shares (10.00%) of PulseLink Common Stock. Her continued engagement is critical to the technology roadmap, product development pipeline, and the integration of PulseLink's technology into Vantage's platform.

Post-Closing Retention Agreement. The parties have negotiated a three (3) year retention agreement for Chandrasekaran that includes a retention bonus of $180,000, payable in two installments: (a) fifty percent (50%), or $90,000, payable at twelve (12) months following the Closing Date; and (b) fifty percent (50%), or $90,000, payable at twenty-four (24) months following the Closing Date. Payment of each installment is contingent on Chandrasekaran's continued employment with PulseLink (or its successor) through the applicable payment date.

Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement. Chandrasekaran will execute a Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement with a restrictive period of two (2) years following the Closing Date.

3. Nathan Vosburg — COO

Nathan Vosburg serves as PulseLink's Chief Operating Officer, managing the Company's supply chain, manufacturing relationships (including contract manufacturing oversight), and operational processes. Vosburg holds 374,000 shares (5.00%) of PulseLink Common Stock.

Post-Closing Employment Agreement. The parties have negotiated a two (2) year employment agreement for Vosburg with an annual base salary of $260,000, plus eligibility for a performance-based bonus. The employment agreement will include customary terms regarding duties, reporting relationships, benefits eligibility, and termination provisions.

Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement. Vosburg will execute a Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement with a restrictive period of two (2) years following the Closing Date.

C. Employee Benefit Plans

PulseLink maintains the following employee benefit plans and programs:

(i) 401(k) Retirement Plan. PulseLink sponsors a 401(k) retirement savings plan for eligible employees. The plan does not currently include an employer matching contribution. We reviewed the plan documents and did not identify any material compliance issues. The plan is intended to qualify under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

(ii) Group Health Insurance. PulseLink provides group health insurance coverage to eligible employees and their dependents through a commercially available group health plan.

(iii) Dental and Vision Insurance. PulseLink provides dental and vision insurance coverage to eligible employees.

(iv) Paid Time Off. PulseLink maintains a standard paid time off (PTO) policy providing accrued PTO for eligible employees.

(v) Equity Incentive Plan. As discussed in Section IV.D above, PulseLink maintains an Equity Incentive Plan, which is expected to be terminated at or prior to closing. All outstanding options will be exercised or cancelled and cashed out in connection with the Transaction.

PulseLink does not maintain any defined benefit pension plans, post-retirement health or welfare benefit plans, or other material benefit plans beyond those described above. We did not identify any deferred compensation arrangements that would trigger issues under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, nor any excess parachute payment issues under Sections 280G or 4999 of the Code.

D. Employment Agreements and Offer Letters

We reviewed PulseLink's form employment agreement and form offer letter, as well as the individual employment agreements and offer letters for key employees. We did not identify any unusual severance provisions, change-of-control bonus provisions, golden parachute arrangements, or other provisions that would create material obligations or liabilities at or following closing in connection with the Transaction. All employment relationships are at-will (subject to applicable law), other than the post-closing employment and retention agreements being negotiated as described above.

E. Non-Competition / Non-Solicitation Agreements (Pre-Existing)