FR EA
1012-00005 · Stonefield Logistics Group · Document Management
master-document-index.xlsx DOCUMENT Litigation
69 / 150 ← → ✕
Contract analysis Extract to table

[sheet: Index Header]

FieldValue
Document TitleMaster Document Index — Calderwood & Harkness LLP Work Product File
Matter NameVantor Holdings Corp. v. Stonefield Logistics Group Inc.
Case Number22-cv-07841 (S.D.N.Y.)
Matter Number1012-00005
ClientStonefield Logistics Group Inc.
Presiding JudgeHon. Margaret T. Calloway, U.S.D.J.
Responsible PartnerSamuel Eklund
Billing PartnerLinda Osei
Prepared ByHelen Tsao, Senior Paralegal
Date PreparedJanuary 10, 2025
ClassificationConfidential — Attorney Work Product / Attorney-Client Privileged
Total Documents Indexed150
Categories13

[sheet: I. Engagement & Admin]

Doc #TitleDateAuthor / FromTo / RecipientFormatDescription
1Engagement Letter — Stonefield Logistics Group Inc.September 1, 2022Samuel EklundTobias Wren (SLG)docxFormal engagement letter setting forth scope (defense of Vantor v. Stonefield, 22-cv-07841), billing rates (with 10% Ridgeline portfolio discount on associate rates), staffing, estimated budget range, and terms of representation under NY law.
2Conflict Check MemorandumAugust 29, 2022Linda OseiSamuel EklunddocxInternal memo confirming conflicts clearance for representation of Stonefield against Vantor Holdings Corp.; notes no prior matters involving Vantor or its affiliates; confirms Ridgeline existing-client clearance.
3New Matter Intake FormSeptember 1, 2022Helen TsaoC&H Records / FinancedocxInternal intake form: Matter No. 1012-00005; client Stonefield Logistics Group Inc.; matter type Litigation (General); responsible partner Eklund; billing partner Osei.
4Litigation Hold Memorandum to ClientSeptember 2, 2022Patrick GallagherTobias Wren, Priya Ramachandran, Carlos Medina, Janet Kirkwood, Raymond Hess (SLG)docxInstructs SLG personnel to preserve all documents and ESI related to the Vantor relationship, TSA, termination, and related communications; details categories of documents subject to hold.
5Litigation Hold Acknowledgment — KirkwoodSeptember 6, 2022Janet KirkwoodPatrick GallagherdocxSigned acknowledgment of litigation hold obligations.
6Litigation Hold Acknowledgment — HessSeptember 5, 2022Raymond HessPatrick GallagherdocxSigned acknowledgment of litigation hold obligations.
7Litigation Hold Acknowledgment — MedinaSeptember 7, 2022Carlos MedinaPatrick GallagherdocxSigned acknowledgment of litigation hold obligations.
8Litigation Hold Acknowledgment — RamachandranSeptember 6, 2022Priya RamachandranPatrick GallagherdocxSigned acknowledgment of litigation hold obligations.
9Budget Memorandum — Preliminary Litigation BudgetSeptember 12, 2022Linda OseiTobias Wren, Alison Trang (Ridgeline)xlsxPreliminary budget for defense through summary judgment: estimated $3.5M–$5.2M in fees; $400K–$750K in costs/disbursements; broken out by phase (pleadings, discovery, depositions, experts, dispositive motions, trial prep).
10Quarterly Billing Summary — Q4 2022January 15, 2023Linda OseiTobias WrenxlsxSummary of fees ($487,250) and disbursements ($42,180) for Oct.–Dec. 2022.
11Quarterly Billing Summary — Q1 2023April 14, 2023Linda OseiTobias WrenxlsxSummary of fees ($612,400) and disbursements ($78,340) for Jan.–Mar. 2023.
12Quarterly Billing Summary — Q2 2023July 15, 2023Linda OseiTobias WrenxlsxSummary of fees ($891,700) and disbursements ($194,620) for Apr.–Jun. 2023 (heavy discovery period).

[sheet: II. Case Assessment & Strategy]

Doc #TitleDateAuthor / FromTo / RecipientFormatDescription
13Preliminary Case Assessment MemorandumSeptember 9, 2022Patrick Gallagher, Simone LarocheSamuel Eklund, Linda Oseidocx18-page analysis of the Complaint, TSA provisions, and Stonefield's termination; assesses strength of 'for Cause' termination defense; identifies key risks (Kirkwood email re volume diversion; rate adjustment motive); recommends filing Rule 12(b)(6) motion targeting liquidated damages and lost profits claims.
14TSA Contract Review MemorandumSeptember 14, 2022Simone LarochePatrick Gallagher, Samuel EklunddocxDetailed 22-page analysis of TSA terms, focusing on Section 13.1 (Termination for Cause), Section 14.2 (liquidated damages), Section 12.1 (Force Majeure), Section 7.4 (Substitute Equipment), and Schedule C (Exclusivity). Identifies ambiguity in 'material breach' definition and cure standard.
15Memorandum re Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clause Under NY LawSeptember 19, 2022Simone LarocheSamuel Eklund, Patrick GallagherdocxResearch memo analyzing NY law on enforceability of liquidated damages provisions; discusses two-part test; assesses likelihood of court finding $67.23M liquidated damages clause is an unenforceable penalty. Concludes: 'moderate' chance of unenforceability finding.
16Memorandum re Force Majeure Defense — ACV ShortfallSeptember 22, 2022Patrick GallagherSamuel EklunddocxAnalysis of Stonefield's invocation of force majeure under Section 12.1 for COVID-19 freight demand impact (April–September 2020); concludes invocation was timely and proper; adjusted CY2 ACV of $21.6M well exceeded by $31.8M in actual tenders.
17Defense Strategy OutlineSeptember 26, 2022Samuel EklundTobias Wren, Alison TrangdocxHigh-level litigation strategy memorandum: (1) file MTD on liquidated damages and lost profits; (2) build factual record of VTS operational failures through discovery; (3) retain damages rebuttal expert; (4) pursue summary judgment on Cause termination; (5) contingency: explore settlement if discovery produces adverse facts on rate-adjustment motive.
18Email — Initial Assessment Discussion with ClientSeptember 10, 2022Samuel EklundTobias Wren, Marcus DentonemlEmail summarizing initial impressions and scheduling in-person strategy session for Sept. 15.
19Meeting Notes — Strategy Session (Sept. 15, 2022)September 15, 2022Helen TsaoFiledocxNotes from in-person meeting at SLG Fort Worth offices. Attendees: Eklund, Gallagher (C&H, via video); Denton, Wren, Ramachandran, Medina, Kirkwood, Hess (SLG). Discussed timeline of Vantor failures, cure process, Kirkwood email context, rate adjustment awareness. Kirkwood stated volume diversion was to 'non-Primary Lanes only' and was responsive to VTS tender rejections.
20Memorandum re Exclusivity Analysis — Schedule C LanesSeptember 30, 2022Simone LarochePatrick GallagherdocxAnalysis of 14 'Primary Lanes' in Schedule C; maps Cascade Freight Systems and Briarwood Trucking usage to Lanes 8–14; concludes Lanes 8–14 are classified as 'Secondary Lanes' and not subject to exclusivity restrictions under Schedule C, Section 2(b).
21Email — Ridgeline Board UpdateOctober 3, 2022Samuel EklundAlison Trang, Douglas Whitmore (Ridgeline)emlPrivileged email updating Ridgeline on initial assessment, litigation strategy, and budget; requests authorization for expert retention.
22Research Memorandum — Pretext and Good Faith in Termination for CauseOctober 7, 2022Simone LarochePatrick Gallagher, Samuel EklunddocxMemo analyzing NY case law on 'pretextual' terminations; concludes that even if Stonefield had mixed motives (cost savings + genuine performance concerns), termination remains valid if objective Cause existed at the time of termination; burden on Vantor to show no Cause existed.

[sheet: III. Pleadings & Court Filings]

Doc #TitleDateAuthor / FromTo / RecipientFormatDescription
23Notice of Appearance — Calderwood & Harkness LLPSeptember 8, 2022Samuel EklundClerk, S.D.N.Y.docxNotice of appearance on behalf of defendant Stonefield Logistics Group Inc.
24Draft Motion to Dismiss (Rule 12(b)(6)) — Internal Working DraftSeptember 28, 2022Patrick Gallagher, Simone LarocheSamuel EklunddocxFirst draft of MTD arguing: (i) liquidated damages clause is unenforceable penalty; (ii) lost profits claim fails to plead damages with requisite certainty.
25Revised Draft Motion to DismissOctober 5, 2022Patrick GallagherSamuel EklunddocxRevised draft incorporating Eklund's comments; refined penalty argument; added alternative argument that liquidated damages and lost profits are duplicative. [Redline of Doc. 24]
26Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss — FinalOctober 14, 2022Samuel Eklund, Patrick GallagherCourt (Filed)docx28-page memorandum filed with the Court; argues the liquidated damages clause in Section 14.2 constitutes an unenforceable penalty under NY law and that the lost profits claim is inadequately pled.
27Declaration of Samuel Eklund in Support of Motion to DismissOctober 14, 2022Samuel EklundCourt (Filed)docxAttorney declaration attaching TSA (Ex. A) and Cure Notice (Ex. B).
28Analysis of Vantor's Opposition to Motion to DismissNovember 22, 2022Patrick Gallagher, Simone LarocheSamuel EklunddocxInternal memo analyzing Vantor's opposition brief; identifies strong and weak arguments; recommends approach for reply.
29Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss — DraftNovember 29, 2022Patrick GallagherSamuel EklunddocxDraft reply addressing Vantor's opposition; distinguishes cited cases; argues Vantor conflates enforceability analysis with factual merits.
30Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss — FinalDecember 5, 2022Samuel Eklund, Patrick GallagherCourt (Filed)docxFiled reply memorandum. (Note: Motion was denied as moot Dec. 16, 2022, following filing of Amended Complaint.)
31Internal Memorandum — Analysis of Amended ComplaintDecember 5, 2022Simone LarochePatrick Gallagher, Samuel EklunddocxAnalysis of Vantor's Amended Complaint filed Dec. 2, 2022; identifies new allegations of Stonefield volume shortfall breach, lane exclusivity violations, and pretextual termination motive (rate adjustment avoidance); recommends not filing renewed MTD in favor of answering and building factual record.
32Draft Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Amended ComplaintDecember 19, 2022Patrick Gallagher, Simone LarocheSamuel EklunddocxFirst draft of Answer; includes 14 affirmative defenses (valid termination for Cause, unenforceable penalty, failure to mitigate, force majeure, unclean hands, contributory breach, waiver, estoppel, setoff, among others).
33Revised Draft Answer and Affirmative DefensesJanuary 4, 2023Patrick GallagherSamuel EklunddocxRevised draft incorporating Eklund's edits and client comments from Tobias Wren. [Redline of Doc. 32]
34Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim — Final (Filed)January 13, 2023Samuel Eklund, Patrick GallagherCourt (Filed)docx42-page Answer denying Vantor's material allegations; asserting 14 affirmative defenses; asserting counterclaim for declaratory judgment that Stonefield's termination of the TSA was valid and for Cause, that no liquidated damages are owed, and that any material breach was committed by VTS.
35Memorandum re Counterclaim StrategyJanuary 6, 2023Patrick GallagherSamuel EklunddocxInternal memo analyzing merits and strategic value of declaratory judgment counterclaim; concludes it frames the narrative, preserves right to affirmative relief, and positions SLG for summary judgment.
36Analysis of Vantor's Answer to CounterclaimFebruary 1, 2023Simone LarochePatrick GallagherdocxBrief memo noting Vantor's denials and affirmative defenses to counterclaim; no surprises.
37Joint Proposed Case Management PlanFebruary 7, 2023Patrick Gallagher (jointly with Jason Whitford, CRS)CourtdocxJointly submitted proposed discovery schedule and case management plan.
38Letter Brief re Initial Pretrial ConferenceFebruary 9, 2023Patrick GallagherHon. Margaret T. CallowaydocxPre-conference letter summarizing defendant's position on case management, proposed schedules, and anticipated discovery issues.
39Case Management Order — Annotated CopyFebruary 17, 2023Simone LarocheFiledocxC&H's annotated copy of Judge Calloway's CMO with internal deadline tracking and notes on key provisions. Fact discovery deadline: Sept. 29, 2023; expert discovery deadline: Jan. 12, 2024; dispositive motions: Mar. 1, 2024.
40Letter to Court re Vantor's Failure to Retain CounselJanuary 8, 2024Samuel EklundHon. Margaret T. CallowaydocxLetter advising the Court that Vantor has failed to retain substitute counsel by the December 17, 2023 deadline; requesting status conference and consideration of dismissal for failure to prosecute under FRCP 41(b).
41Draft Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (FRCP 41(b))January 15, 2024Patrick Gallagher, Simone LarocheSamuel EklunddocxInternal draft of motion; held in reserve pending Court's action on Order to Show Cause.
42Memorandum re Strategy Following Vantorovich Pro Se AppearanceFebruary 14, 2024Patrick GallagherSamuel Eklund, Linda OseidocxAnalysis of implications of Vantorovich's pro se appearance on Feb. 12; notes corporate entity cannot appear pro se in federal court; recommends monitoring deadline and preparing renewed motion to dismiss.

[sheet: IV. Discovery — Propounded]

Doc #TitleDateAuthor / FromTo / RecipientFormatDescription
43Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories to PlaintiffMarch 6, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docx25 interrogatories targeting Vantor's damages calculations, mitigation efforts, fleet deployment decisions, and basis for 'pretextual termination' allegation.
44Defendant's First Request for Production of DocumentsMarch 6, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docx38 document requests covering: VTS internal communications re SLG account; fleet records; financial statements; mitigation efforts; communications with alternative shippers; Vantor board minutes; expert retention documents.
45Defendant's Second Request for Production of DocumentsMay 5, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docx12 targeted requests focusing on: VTS fleet redeployment records (Q3–Q4 2021); communications between Milescu and Vantorovich re SLG dedicated capacity; VTS contracts with shippers to whom fleet was redirected; VTS driver termination records (post-March 2022).
46Defendant's First Set of Requests for AdmissionMarch 6, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docx30 RFAs addressing: VTS's Q4 2021 performance metrics; receipt and content of Cure Notice; failure to cure within 30 days; VTS's removal of tractors from SLG dedicated lanes; applicability of force majeure clause.
47Defendant's Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice — VantorJune 15, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docxNotice designating 12 topics for corporate deposition of Vantor/VTS, including: fleet management decisions; SLG contract performance; damages calculation methodology; mitigation efforts; corporate structure and decision-making.
48Defendant's Subpoena Duces Tecum — Cascade Freight Systems Inc.June 28, 2023Simone LarocheCascade Freight Systems Inc.docxThird-party subpoena seeking contracts and communications between Cascade and Stonefield for Lanes 8–14; intended to demonstrate non-Primary Lane usage.
49Defendant's Subpoena Duces Tecum — Briarwood Trucking Co.June 28, 2023Simone LarocheBriarwood Trucking Co.docxThird-party subpoena seeking same categories as Cascade subpoena.
50Cover Letter re Defendant's Document Production (First Production)April 14, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docxCover letter accompanying Stonefield's first production of 42,387 documents (approx. 186,000 pages) via Pinnacle Forensics review platform; includes Bates range index (SLG-000001 through SLG-042387) and privilege log reference.
51Privilege Log — Stonefield First ProductionApril 14, 2023Simone Laroche, Helen TsaoCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)xlsxLog of 1,247 documents withheld on privilege grounds (attorney-client privilege and/or work product); entries include date, author, recipient, subject-matter description, and privilege basis.
52Supplemental Privilege LogJune 30, 2023Simone Laroche, Helen TsaoCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)xlsxSupplemental log adding 218 documents identified during second-phase review.
53Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of InterrogatoriesApril 14, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docxStonefield's responses and objections to Vantor's 25 interrogatories; substantive responses to factual questions regarding termination decision, cure process, volume tenders, and carrier diversification.
54Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's First Request for ProductionApril 14, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docxResponses and objections to Vantor's 38 RFPs; identifies categories of produced documents by Bates range; asserts objections to 7 requests as overbroad or seeking privileged material.
55Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for AdmissionApril 14, 2023Patrick GallagherCaldwell Royce & Shapiro LLP (Vantor)docxResponses to 25 RFAs; admits certain undisputed facts (e.g., existence and execution of TSA); denies allegations of pretextual motive and volume shortfall breach; qualifies responses re VTS performance data.

[sheet: V. Discovery — Received]

Doc #TitleDateAuthor / FromTo / RecipientFormatDescription
56Analysis of Vantor's Interrogatory ResponsesMay 8, 2023Simone LarochePatrick Gallagher, Samuel EklunddocxMemo analyzing Vantor's responses to SLG's First Interrogatories; identifies evasive answers on mitigation efforts (Interrog. 14) and fleet redeployment decisions (Interrog. 9); recommends motion to compel supplementation.
57Analysis of Vantor's First Document ProductionMay 12, 2023Simone Laroche, Kara NystromPatrick GallagherdocxMemo summarizing key documents in Vantor's production of 28,914 documents; highlights Milescu-Vantorovich November 12, 2021 email (VHC-008417); identifies gaps in fleet records and financial data.
58Key Document Index — Vantor ProductionMay 15, 2023Kara Nystrom, Helen TsaoPatrick Gallagher, Simone LarochexlsxIndexed compilation of 87 'hot' documents from Vantor's production, organized by topic (fleet decisions, SLG communications, internal strategy, financial records).
59Memorandum re 'Smoking Gun' Email Analysis (VHC-008417)May 14, 2023Simone LarocheSamuel Eklund, Patrick GallagherdocxDetailed analysis of Milescu's November 12, 2021 email stating VTS 'pulled 85 tractors off the SLG dedicated lanes'; argues this demonstrates intentional, undisclosed breach by VTS and undermines Vantor's claim that performance deficiencies were caused by SLG volume shortfalls.
60Meet-and-Confer Letter re discovery DeficienciesMay 30, 2023Patrick GallagherJason Whitford (CRS)docxLetter identifying deficiencies in Vantor's discovery responses and document production; demands supplemental responses to Interrogatories 9, 14, and 18; demands production of fleet redeployment records responsive to Second RFP Nos. 1–5.
61Discovery Dispute Letter Brief to CourtJune 5, 2023Patrick GallagherHon. Margaret T. CallowaydocxLetter brief requesting Court intervention re Vantor's refusal to produce fleet redeployment records; argues documents are directly relevant to material breach and mitigation issues.
62Analysis of Court's June 9, 2023 discovery OrderJune 12, 2023Simone LarochePatrick GallagherdocxMemo analyzing Judge Calloway's order compelling production of fleet redeployment records; notes favorable language regarding relevance of VTS's unilateral capacity reduction.
63Analysis of Vantor's Supplemental ProductionJuly 3, 2023Kara Nystrom, Simone LarochePatrick GallagherdocxMemo summarizing Vantor's supplemental production of 4,218 documents (VHC-029001 through VHC-033218); identifies key fleet management documents showing VTS redirected 85 tractors to Northwind Distribution Co. account in October 2021.
64Key Document Index — Vantor Supplemental ProductionJuly 5, 2023Kara NystromPatrick Gallagher, Simone LarochexlsxIndex of 34 additional 'hot' documents from supplemental production.
65Analysis of Vantor's RFA ResponsesMay 10, 2023Simone LarochePatrick GallagherdocxMemo noting Vantor's qualified denials and evasive responses to key RFAs; identifies admissions useful for summary judgment (e.g., admission that on-time pickup rate was 78.2% in Q4 2021).
66Analysis of Cascade Freight Systems Subpoena ResponseAugust 1, 2023Simone LarochePatrick GallagherdocxMemo analyzing documents produced by Cascade confirming Stonefield's use of Cascade was limited to Lanes 8–14 (Secondary Lanes); supports non-exclusivity defense.
67Analysis of Briarwood Trucking Co. Subpoena ResponseAugust 3, 2023Simone LarochePatrick GallagherdocxMemo analyzing Briarwood's production; confirms similar lane-specific usage on Secondary Lanes.
68eDiscovery Status ReportApril 10, 2023David MorettiPatrick Gallagher, Samuel EklunddocxReport on Pinnacle Forensics (Project ID: PF-SLG-2022-0914) processing and review metrics: 186,000 pages processed; 42,387 documents produced; 1,247 documents logged as privileged; 6,842 documents flagged for attorney review; TAR 2.0 model achieving 91.3% recall rate.