MEMORANDUM — PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
TO: Rachel Bernstein, Responsible Partner Miriam Calloway, Billing Partner
FROM: Leila Nazari, Lead Associate
DATE: April 1, 2026
RE: Conflicts Check Results — Representation of Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP in Series A Preferred Stock Financing of Quillen Technologies, Inc.
MATTER NUMBER: 1002-00002
BILLING CODE: 78412.001
1. Purpose
This memorandum documents the results of the conflicts of interest check conducted by Calderwood & Harkness LLP ("C&H" or the "Firm") in connection with the proposed engagement of the Firm by Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP ("Pinnacle VC" or the "Client") as investor counsel in a Series A preferred stock financing (the "Financing" or the "Transaction") of Quillen Technologies, Inc. ("Quillen" or "Quillen Tech"). The purpose of this memorandum is to identify, evaluate, and document any actual or potential conflicts of interest arising from the Firm's current or prior representations that could affect the Firm's ability to undertake the proposed engagement consistent with its professional and ethical obligations.
The conflicts check was conducted pursuant to the Firm's internal conflict clearance procedures, as set forth in the Calderwood & Harkness LLP Conflicts of Interest Policy Manual (revised January 2025), and in compliance with the applicable California Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rule 1.7 (Conflict of Interest: Current Clients), Rule 1.9 (Duties to Former Clients), and Rule 1.10 (Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule). Additionally, because the Transaction involves entities organized under Delaware law and with operations in Massachusetts, the conflicts analysis has considered the relevant provisions of the Delaware Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct and the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct to the extent applicable.
The engagement was formally opened on April 1, 2026, following the completion of the conflicts clearance process described herein and the determination that no conflicts of interest preclude the Firm from undertaking the proposed representation.
2. Matter Description
Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP, a Delaware limited partnership (EIN 88-3529104), acting through its general partner entity, Pinnacle Capital Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (EIN 88-3471082), headquartered at 450 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite 1200, San Francisco, California 94115, proposes to serve as lead investor in a $22,500,000 Series A preferred equity financing of Quillen Technologies, Inc., a Delaware C-corporation (DE File Number 7384219; EIN 93-4817265) headquartered at 88 Garrison Street, Floor 4, Boston, Massachusetts 02116. Quillen Technologies was incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 12, 2023, and operates in the healthcare technology sector.
Pinnacle VC's proposed investment in the Financing consists of $14,000,000 in exchange for 2,800,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $5.00 per share, representing the largest allocation in the Series A round and conferring upon Pinnacle VC the status of lead investor. As lead investor, Pinnacle VC is expected to negotiate the principal economic and governance terms of the Financing, including board representation, protective provisions, anti-dilution protections, information rights, and related investor rights.
Two co-investors are expected to participate in the Financing alongside Pinnacle VC. Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP, a Delaware limited partnership, is expected to invest $6,000,000, and Stonebridge Ventures LLC, a New York limited liability company, is expected to invest $2,500,000. The aggregate round size of $22,500,000 reflects the combined commitments of all three investors, subject to finalization of definitive documentation.
Quillen Technologies is represented in the Transaction by the law firm of Fenwick, Torres & Keane LLP, with offices at 200 Clarendon Street, Suite 3400, Boston, Massachusetts 02116. The lead partner at Fenwick, Torres & Keane on the matter is Gregory Navarro, with associate Sophie Marchetti serving as working counsel. Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP is represented by its own counsel, Whitfield & Pryor LLP, based in New York, New York. Stonebridge Ventures LLC has not, to the Firm's knowledge, engaged separate counsel and may rely on the Transaction documents as negotiated by Pinnacle VC's counsel, subject to its own internal review.
Calderwood & Harkness LLP's scope of engagement in this matter encompasses advising Pinnacle VC on term sheet negotiation, conducting and coordinating legal due diligence on Quillen Technologies (including corporate governance, capitalization, intellectual property, material contracts, regulatory compliance, litigation, and employment matters), and drafting and negotiation of the definitive transaction documents through closing. The definitive transaction documents are expected to include, without limitation, a Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, an Investors' Rights Agreement, a Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement, a Voting Agreement, and related ancillary documents (including legal opinions, management rights letters, and compliance certificates). The target closing date for the Transaction is June 15, 2026.
3. Parties and Individuals Searched
The following parties and individuals were identified as relevant to the conflicts analysis and were searched in the Firm's conflicts clearance systems. The list was compiled based on information provided by the Client, a preliminary review of Quillen Technologies' capitalization table and organizational documents as furnished by Fenwick, Torres & Keane LLP, and publicly available information obtained through standard background research.
3.1 Client and Client Affiliates
The following entities and individuals are associated with the proposed client, Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP:
• Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP — the Client; a Delaware limited partnership; EIN 88-3529104; principal office at 450 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA 94115.
• Pinnacle Capital Management LLC — the General Partner of Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP; a Delaware limited liability company; EIN 88-3471082; same principal office address. Pinnacle Capital Management LLC exercises management authority over the Fund and directs all investment decisions on behalf of the Fund's limited partners.
• Sandeep Rajan — Managing Partner and GP Principal of Pinnacle Capital Management LLC. Mr. Rajan serves as the senior decision-maker for the Pinnacle platform and is a signatory on the engagement letter with the Firm.
• Christine Aldridge — Partner and Deal Lead at Pinnacle VC. Ms. Aldridge is the primary client contact for the Transaction and is responsible for leading Pinnacle's investment in Quillen Technologies.
• Tomas Medina — Vice President, Due Diligence, at Pinnacle VC. Mr. Medina is coordinating the Client's due diligence efforts in connection with the Transaction and will serve as the primary point of contact for the Firm's due diligence work streams.
• Pinnacle Venture Fund I LP — the predecessor fund to Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP; a Delaware limited partnership; approximately $210,000,000 in committed capital (2022 vintage). Although Pinnacle Venture Fund I LP is not a party to the proposed Transaction, it shares a common general partner with Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP, and any matters involving Fund I were reviewed to ensure that no adverse relationship or positional conflict exists that could affect the proposed engagement.
3.2 Target Company and Affiliates
The following entities and individuals are associated with Quillen Technologies, Inc., the target company in the proposed Financing:
• Quillen Technologies, Inc. — the target company; a Delaware C-corporation; DE File Number 7384219; EIN 93-4817265; incorporated July 12, 2023; principal office at 88 Garrison Street, Floor 4, Boston, MA 02116. Quillen Technologies operates in the healthcare technology sector and is developing proprietary software solutions for clinical trial management and regulatory data analytics.
• Dr. Amara Osei — Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Quillen Technologies. Dr. Osei currently holds 3,200,000 shares of Common Stock, representing the single largest individual equity position in the company. Dr. Osei will be a party to the Voting Agreement and ROFR/Co-Sale Agreement in connection with the Financing.
• Julian Voss — Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer of Quillen Technologies. Mr. Voss currently holds 2,800,000 shares of Common Stock and, like Dr. Osei, will be a party to the ancillary transaction agreements. Mr. Voss is responsible for the company's technology platform and intellectual property development.
• Priya Chandrasekar — Vice President of Product at Quillen Technologies. Ms. Chandrasekar currently holds 400,000 shares of Common Stock and joined the company in January 2025. Ms. Chandrasekar's equity position and her role as a key employee make her a relevant party for the conflicts analysis, particularly given that her equity grant may be subject to vesting acceleration provisions that are commonly negotiated in connection with Series A financings.
3.3 Existing Investors — Seed Round
The following entities participated in Quillen Technologies' prior seed-stage equity financing and hold Series Seed Preferred Stock:
• Harborview Angel Syndicate LLC — a Massachusetts limited liability company; holder of 1,500,000 shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock, representing an aggregate investment of $1,800,000; Managing Member: Margaret "Peggy" Dunlap. Harborview Angel Syndicate is Quillen's largest seed-stage investor and is expected to be a party to the amended and restated investor rights, voting, and ROFR/co-sale agreements in the Transaction.
• Ridgepoint Seed Partners LP — a Delaware limited partnership; holder of 1,000,000 shares of Series Seed Preferred Stock, representing an aggregate investment of $1,200,000; General Partner: Aaron Fitch. Ridgepoint is similarly expected to be a party to the ancillary transaction agreements.
3.4 Convertible Note Holders
The following entities and individuals hold outstanding convertible promissory notes issued by Quillen Technologies that are expected to convert into equity in connection with the Series A Financing:
• Harborview Angel Syndicate LLC — holder of a convertible promissory note with $750,000 in outstanding principal. Harborview is also a seed equity investor, as noted in Section 3.3 above. The terms of conversion of this note will be a subject of negotiation in the Transaction.
• Caldwell Family Office LLC — a Connecticut limited liability company; holder of a convertible promissory note with $500,000 in outstanding principal; Principal: Nathan Caldwell. The Caldwell Family Office is a single-family office investment vehicle.
• Dr. Lawrence Hu — an individual angel investor; holder of a convertible promissory note with $250,000 in outstanding principal. Dr. Hu is a former Chief Investment Officer of a large pension fund and invests in early-stage healthcare technology companies in his personal capacity.
3.5 Co-Investors in Series A
The following entities are expected to co-invest alongside Pinnacle VC in the Series A Financing:
• Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP — a Delaware limited partnership; expected investment of $6,000,000 in the Financing; primary contact: Diana Hershfield, Partner. Blackthorn is represented by its own counsel, Whitfield & Pryor LLP (New York, NY), and will negotiate its side letter and any fund-specific terms independently.
• Stonebridge Ventures LLC — a New York limited liability company; expected investment of $2,500,000 in the Financing; primary contact: Kevin Ashby, Managing Director. Stonebridge has not, to the Firm's knowledge, engaged separate counsel for the Transaction.
3.6 Opposing and Other Counsel
The following law firms are serving as counsel to other parties in the Transaction:
• Fenwick, Torres & Keane LLP — counsel to Quillen Technologies, Inc. (the Company); Lead Partner: Gregory Navarro; Associate: Sophie Marchetti; Offices: 200 Clarendon Street, Suite 3400, Boston, MA 02116. Fenwick, Torres & Keane is expected to serve as company counsel and will prepare the initial drafts of the definitive transaction documents for review and negotiation.
• Whitfield & Pryor LLP — counsel to Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP; New York, New York. Whitfield & Pryor is expected to participate in the negotiation of the definitive documents on behalf of Blackthorn and may prepare a separate side letter for Blackthorn's participation.
3.7 Other Third Parties Searched
The following third-party service providers and agents were identified as having a material relationship to the Transaction or to the parties and were included in the conflicts search:
• Pemberton & Associates CPAs LLP — Quillen Technologies' independent auditor; Engagement Partner: Diane Stratton, CPA; Boston, Massachusetts. Pemberton is expected to provide an audited financial statement or reviewed financial statements in connection with the Transaction's due diligence process.
• Crescent National Bank — Quillen Technologies' primary operating bank; Boston, Massachusetts. The Firm reviewed its records for any representations of or adverse to Crescent National Bank to ensure that no conflict would arise in connection with due diligence review of Quillen's banking relationships.
• Commonwealth Escrow Services, Inc. — potential escrow agent for the Transaction; 75 Federal Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02110. Commonwealth may serve as escrow agent in connection with any holdback or indemnification escrow provisions in the definitive documents.
• Granite State Registered Agents, Inc. — Delaware registered agent for both Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP and Quillen Technologies, Inc.; 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801. Granite State serves as the statutory registered agent in the State of Delaware for both the Client and the target company.
4. Databases and Systems Searched
The conflicts check was conducted using the following Firm databases and systems:
1. Calderwood & Harkness LLP Internal Conflicts Database (IntaKe System). The IntaKe system is the Firm's primary enterprise conflicts management platform. It maintains a comprehensive record of all current and former clients, adverse parties, related entities, and individual contacts across all matters handled by the Firm. The IntaKe system was queried using the search methodology described in Section 5 below.
2. New-Matter Intake Records. The Firm's new-matter intake records were reviewed to identify any pending intake requests or recently opened matters involving any of the parties or individuals identified in Section 3.
3. Historical Client/Matter Lists (Active and Closed Matters for the Past Seven Years). The Firm maintains historical records of all active and closed matters for a rolling seven-year period, consistent with the Firm's document retention policy. These records were searched to identify any prior representations of or adverse to the parties or individuals listed in Section 3, including matters that may have been closed but that could give rise to duties to former clients under Rule 1.9 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct.
4. Personnel Records (Lateral Hire Prior-Representation Disclosures). The Firm's human resources records, including prior-representation disclosures submitted by lateral hires during the onboarding process, were reviewed to determine whether any current Firm attorney had previously represented or been adverse to any of the parties or individuals identified in Section 3 while employed at a prior firm. This review covered all lateral attorneys who joined the Firm within the past five years.
All searches were conducted on April 1, 2026, by the undersigned, Leila Nazari, Lead Associate, with the assistance and under the supervision of the Firm's General Counsel and Conflicts Department.
5. Search Methodology
The conflicts search was conducted in accordance with the Firm's standard conflict clearance protocols. The following methodology was employed to ensure a thorough and comprehensive review:
Entity Name Searches. All entity names identified in Section 3 were searched in the IntaKe system and related databases using the full legal name of each entity, any commonly used short names, and all known trade name variants. For example, "Quillen Technologies, Inc." was searched as "Quillen Technologies, Inc.," "Quillen Technologies," "Quillen Tech," and "Quillen." Similarly, "Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP" was searched as "Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP," "Pinnacle Venture Fund II," "Pinnacle VC," "Pinnacle Capital," "Pinnacle Capital Management LLC," and "Pinnacle Capital Management." Truncated and wildcard searches (e.g., "Pinnacle," "Quillen") were also employed to capture partial name matches and variant spellings.
Individual Name Searches. All individual names identified in Section 3 were searched by full legal name, surname only, first name and surname combinations, and any known aliases, nicknames, or alternative spellings. For example, Margaret "Peggy" Dunlap was searched as "Margaret Dunlap," "Peggy Dunlap," "M. Dunlap," and "Dunlap." Dr. Amara Osei was searched as "Amara Osei," "Dr. Amara Osei," "A. Osei," and "Osei."
Cross-Referencing. Search results were cross-referenced against the Firm's current and former client lists, adverse party lists, matter descriptions, and entity relationship trees maintained within the IntaKe system. This cross-referencing was designed to identify not only direct representations of or adverse to the searched parties, but also indirect relationships (e.g., parent-subsidiary relationships, affiliate structures, or common ownership) that might give rise to a conflict of interest.
Prior Representation Review. Any prior representations of or adverse to any party or affiliate identified in the search results were reviewed in detail, including examination of the scope of the prior engagement, the nature of the legal services provided, the identity of the adverse parties, and the relevance of any confidential information obtained in the prior representation to the proposed engagement.
Lateral Hire Screening. The lateral hire prior-representation disclosures of all attorneys on the proposed engagement team — Rachel Bernstein, Miriam Calloway, Leila Nazari, and Robert Jansen — were specifically reviewed to confirm that no individual attorney has a personal conflict arising from prior representations at other firms.
6. Results of Conflicts Check
The results of the conflicts search are set forth below, organized by party or group of parties. Each subsection identifies the party searched, summarizes the relevant search results, and states the conclusion reached with respect to the existence or absence of a conflict of interest.
6.1 Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP / Pinnacle Capital Management LLC
Calderwood & Harkness LLP has not previously represented Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP, Pinnacle Capital Management LLC, or any of their affiliates in any capacity. The IntaKe system returned no results for any current or former matters involving any Pinnacle entity as a client, adverse party, or related party.
Additionally, the Firm has not previously represented Pinnacle Venture Fund I LP, the predecessor fund to Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP, in any capacity. No prior or current adverse representations against any Pinnacle entity were identified. The Firm's personnel records, including lateral hire prior-representation disclosures, did not reveal any prior relationships between Firm attorneys and the Pinnacle entities that would give rise to a conflict.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.2 Quillen Technologies, Inc.
Calderwood & Harkness LLP has not previously represented Quillen Technologies, Inc. in any capacity. The IntaKe system returned no results for any current or former matters involving Quillen Technologies as a client, adverse party, or related party. Given that Quillen Technologies was incorporated on July 12, 2023, and is an early-stage company, the absence of any prior relationship with the Firm is consistent with expectations.
No prior or current adverse representations against Quillen Technologies were identified. The Firm has no ongoing or past matters in which Quillen Technologies was named as an opposing party, a target of litigation, a subject of regulatory proceedings, or a counterparty in any transactional matter.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.3 Dr. Amara Osei, Julian Voss, and Priya Chandrasekar
No prior or current representations of or adverse to Dr. Amara Osei, Julian Voss, or Priya Chandrasekar were identified in the Firm's records. The IntaKe system returned no results for any of these individuals as clients, adverse parties, or contacts in any current or former matter. The Firm's personnel records did not reveal any prior relationships between Firm attorneys and any of these individuals.
It is noted that, in the proposed Transaction, Dr. Osei, Mr. Voss, and Ms. Chandrasekar are officers and/or key employees of the target company, Quillen Technologies, and are not clients of the Firm. The Firm's representation is limited to Pinnacle VC, and no attorney-client relationship will exist between the Firm and any individual officer, director, or employee of Quillen Technologies.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.4 Harborview Angel Syndicate LLC / Margaret "Peggy" Dunlap
No prior or current representations of or adverse to Harborview Angel Syndicate LLC or Margaret "Peggy" Dunlap were identified in the Firm's records. The IntaKe system returned no results for either Harborview Angel Syndicate LLC or Margaret Dunlap (searched under all name variants, including "Peggy Dunlap") as clients, adverse parties, or related parties in any current or former matter.
Harborview is both a seed equity investor and a convertible note holder in Quillen Technologies. In the proposed Transaction, Harborview's interests as an existing investor may be affected by the terms of the Series A Financing, including the conversion terms of its convertible note and the potential dilution of its seed-stage equity position. However, because the Firm has no prior or current relationship with Harborview, no conflict arises from the Firm's representation of Pinnacle VC in the Financing.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.5 Ridgepoint Seed Partners LP / Aaron Fitch
No prior or current representations of or adverse to Ridgepoint Seed Partners LP or Aaron Fitch were identified in the Firm's records. The IntaKe system returned no results for either entity or individual as a client, adverse party, or related party in any current or former matter.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.6 Caldwell Family Office LLC / Nathan Caldwell
No prior or current representations of or adverse to Caldwell Family Office LLC or Nathan Caldwell were identified in the Firm's records. The IntaKe system returned no results for either entity or individual as a client, adverse party, or related party in any current or former matter. Searches were also conducted for the variant "Caldwell Family Office" and "N. Caldwell," with no results returned.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.7 Dr. Lawrence Hu
No prior or current representations of or adverse to Dr. Lawrence Hu were identified in the Firm's records. The IntaKe system returned no results for Dr. Hu as a client, adverse party, or contact in any current or former matter. Searches were conducted under "Lawrence Hu," "Dr. Lawrence Hu," "L. Hu," and "Hu, Lawrence," with no results returned.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.8 Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP / Diana Hershfield
No prior or current representations of or adverse to Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP or Diana Hershfield were identified in the Firm's records. The IntaKe system returned no results for either Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP or Diana Hershfield as a client, adverse party, or related party in any current or former matter. Additional searches were conducted for "Blackthorn Growth Fund," "Blackthorn Growth," and "Blackthorn," as well as for "D. Hershfield" and "Hershfield," with no results returned.
It is noted that Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP is a co-investor alongside the Firm's client, Pinnacle VC, in the proposed Series A Financing. Blackthorn is represented by its own independent counsel, Whitfield & Pryor LLP (New York, NY). The interests of Pinnacle VC and Blackthorn as co-investors in the same financing round are expected to be substantially aligned on most material terms, including valuation, liquidation preference, protective provisions, and board governance. However, differences may arise between the co-investors with respect to allocation of investment amounts, board seat designation, side letter provisions, information rights, or other investor-specific terms.
The Firm's engagement is limited exclusively to the representation of Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP. The Firm does not represent, and will not represent, Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP or any other co-investor in connection with the Transaction. Should any material conflict emerge between Pinnacle VC and Blackthorn during the course of the Transaction, the Firm will continue to represent only Pinnacle VC, and Blackthorn will be advised to consult with its own counsel, Whitfield & Pryor LLP, with respect to any such matters.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.9 Stonebridge Ventures LLC / Kevin Ashby
No prior or current representations of or adverse to Stonebridge Ventures LLC or Kevin Ashby were identified in the Firm's records. The IntaKe system returned no results for either Stonebridge Ventures LLC or Kevin Ashby as a client, adverse party, or related party in any current or former matter. Additional searches were conducted for "Stonebridge Ventures," "Stonebridge," "K. Ashby," and "Ashby," with no results returned.
As with Blackthorn, Stonebridge Ventures is a co-investor in the Financing, and the Firm does not represent Stonebridge in any capacity. Stonebridge has not, to the Firm's knowledge, engaged separate counsel for the Transaction.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.10 Fenwick, Torres & Keane LLP / Gregory Navarro / Sophie Marchetti
No prior or current representations were identified in which Fenwick, Torres & Keane LLP was adverse to a Calderwood & Harkness LLP client in a manner that would create a conflict with the proposed engagement. A review of the Firm's historical client and matter records confirmed that there are no current matters in which Calderwood & Harkness LLP and Fenwick, Torres & Keane LLP serve as co-counsel, and there are no current or former matters in which Fenwick, Torres & Keane LLP is or was a client of Calderwood & Harkness LLP.
Searches for the individual attorneys Gregory Navarro and Sophie Marchetti returned no results in the Firm's conflicts databases. No prior professional relationships between Firm attorneys and either Mr. Navarro or Ms. Marchetti were identified in the lateral hire prior-representation disclosures.
It is noted that Fenwick, Torres & Keane LLP will serve as opposing counsel to the Firm in the negotiation of the definitive transaction documents for the Financing. This is an arm's-length, transaction-based adversarial relationship that does not give rise to a conflict of interest under the applicable rules of professional conduct.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.11 Whitfield & Pryor LLP
No conflicts were identified with respect to Whitfield & Pryor LLP. The IntaKe system returned no results indicating any current or former client relationship, co-counsel arrangement, or adverse relationship between the Firm and Whitfield & Pryor LLP that would affect the proposed engagement. Whitfield & Pryor LLP will serve as counsel to Blackthorn Growth Fund III LP, a co-investor whose interests are expected to be substantially aligned with those of Pinnacle VC.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified.
6.12 Other Third Parties (Pemberton & Associates CPAs LLP, Crescent National Bank, Commonwealth Escrow Services, Inc., Granite State Registered Agents, Inc.)
The following third-party entities were included in the conflicts search due to their roles as service providers or agents in connection with the Transaction or the parties thereto:
• Pemberton & Associates CPAs LLP — No prior or current representations of or adverse to Pemberton & Associates CPAs LLP or its engagement partner, Diane Stratton, CPA, were identified in the Firm's records. The Firm's interaction with Pemberton in the Transaction is expected to be limited to receipt and review of audited or reviewed financial statements and, potentially, discussions regarding accounting matters in the context of due diligence.
• Crescent National Bank — No prior or current representations of or adverse to Crescent National Bank were identified in the Firm's records that would create a conflict with respect to this engagement. The Firm's interaction with Crescent National Bank in the Transaction, if any, will be limited to due diligence review of Quillen Technologies' banking and deposit account arrangements.
• Commonwealth Escrow Services, Inc. — No prior or current representations of or adverse to Commonwealth Escrow Services, Inc. were identified in the Firm's records. If Commonwealth is engaged as escrow agent for the Transaction, the Firm's interaction will be limited to negotiation and execution of standard escrow agreement terms.
• Granite State Registered Agents, Inc. — No prior or current representations of or adverse to Granite State Registered Agents, Inc. were identified in the Firm's records. Granite State serves as the Delaware registered agent for both Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP and Quillen Technologies, Inc., which is a common commercial arrangement and does not create a conflict of interest.
Conclusion: No conflicts identified with respect to any of the foregoing third-party entities.
7. Conclusion and Clearance
Based on the comprehensive conflicts search conducted on April 1, 2026, using the databases, systems, and methodology described in Sections 4 and 5 of this memorandum, and based on the detailed results set forth in Section 6, no conflicts of interest have been identified that would preclude Calderwood & Harkness LLP from representing Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP as investor counsel in the proposed Series A preferred stock financing of Quillen Technologies, Inc.
No actual conflicts of interest exist under Rule 1.7 (Conflict of Interest: Current Clients) or Rule 1.9 (Duties to Former Clients) of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. No imputed conflicts exist under Rule 1.10 (Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule). No potential conflicts requiring client consent or waiver have been identified at this time.
Accordingly, the engagement is cleared to proceed. The matter has been opened as Matter Number 1002-00002, Billing Code 78412.001, in the Firm's IntaKe system and accounting records.
The engagement team for this matter consists of the following attorneys:
The assignment of Rachel Bernstein as Responsible Partner reflects the relevance of privacy and data security considerations to Quillen Technologies' healthcare technology platform, which may process sensitive clinical trial data subject to regulatory requirements. The assignment of Miriam Calloway as Billing Partner reflects the healthcare and life sciences industry focus of Quillen Technologies' business. The assignment of Leila Nazari and Robert Jansen as the working attorney team reflects the tax structuring considerations inherent in a preferred stock financing of this size and complexity.
Should any new parties be identified during the course of the engagement — including, without limitation, additional co-investors, consultants, advisors, employees, or counterparties to material contracts under review in due diligence — a supplemental conflicts check should be conducted promptly in accordance with the Firm's conflict clearance procedures. The engagement team is responsible for bringing any newly identified parties or potential conflicts to the attention of the Firm's General Counsel and Conflicts Department without delay.
Additionally, if the scope of the engagement expands beyond the Series A Financing (for example, to include post-closing governance advisory work, follow-on financing transactions, or other matters), a further conflicts analysis should be undertaken to confirm that the Firm's continued representation of Pinnacle VC remains free of conflicts.
8. Document Retention and Confidentiality Notice
This memorandum is an internal, privileged, and confidential attorney work product of Calderwood & Harkness LLP. It was prepared solely for the purpose of documenting the Firm's conflicts of interest analysis in connection with the proposed representation of Pinnacle Venture Fund II LP in the Series A preferred stock financing of Quillen Technologies, Inc.
This memorandum shall be retained in the matter file for Matter Number 1002-00002 in accordance with the Firm's document retention policies. A copy of this memorandum has been provided to the Firm's General Counsel and Conflicts Department for retention in the Firm's centralized conflicts records.
Distribution of this memorandum is strictly limited to the following individuals:
• Rachel Bernstein, Responsible Partner
• Miriam Calloway, Billing Partner
• Leila Nazari, Lead Associate
• Robert Jansen, Working Associate
• Calderwood & Harkness LLP General Counsel / Conflicts Department
This memorandum shall not be disclosed to the Client, to opposing counsel, to any third party, or to any Firm personnel outside the engagement team and the General Counsel / Conflicts Department without the prior written authorization of the Responsible Partner. The contents of this memorandum are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine, and no waiver of either privilege is intended by the preparation, circulation, or retention of this document.
PREPARED BY:
________________________________________
Leila Nazari Lead Associate Calderwood & Harkness LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, CA 94105
Date: April 1, 2026
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
________________________________________
Rachel Bernstein Responsible Partner Calderwood & Harkness LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, CA 94105
Date: April 1, 2026
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Calderwood & Harkness LLP — Conflicts Check Memorandum — Matter No. 1002-00002 This document is not intended for distribution outside the engagement team and the Firm's General Counsel / Conflicts Department.
| Attorney | Role | Practice Group |
| Rachel Bernstein | Responsible Partner | Privacy & Data Security |
| Miriam Calloway | Billing Partner | Healthcare & Life Sciences |
| Leila Nazari | Lead Associate | Tax |
| Robert Jansen | Working Associate | Tax |