1017-00006 · Aurelius Global Media Group · Transaction Documents

rwi-coverage-summary-memo.docx DOCUMENT M&A / Corporate

38 / 40 ← → ✕

Contract analysis Extract to table

MEMORANDUM

TO: File — Matter No. 1043-00002

FROM: Megan Chu, Calderwood & Harkness LLP

DATE: July 22, 2024

RE: Representations and Warranties Insurance — Coverage Summary; Sale of Meridian Press Holdings LLC

CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT / ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED

This memorandum has been prepared by Calderwood & Harkness LLP and is protected by the attorney work product doctrine and the attorney-client privilege. This memorandum is intended solely for internal use and for the benefit of our client, Aurelius Media Holdings Inc. It should not be disclosed to any third party without the prior written consent of this firm.

I. Purpose and Background

This memorandum to file summarizes the material terms, conditions, and exclusions of the representations and warranties insurance ("R&W Insurance" or "RWI") policy bound on July 22, 2024, in connection with the carve-out and sale of 100% of the membership interests in Meridian Press Holdings LLC ("MPH" or the "Company") by Aurelius Media Holdings Inc. ("Seller") to Ridgeline Publishing Acquisition Corp. ("Buyer"), a newly formed acquisition vehicle of Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners Fund IV, L.P. (the "Sponsor" or "Pinnacle Ridge"). The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a comprehensive reference document for the matter file, documenting the key coverage parameters of the RWI policy and the interplay between the policy and the indemnification framework established in the definitive acquisition agreement.

The transaction is governed by the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the "MIPA") dated July 19, 2024, pursuant to which Seller agreed to sell, and Buyer agreed to purchase, all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of MPH. The transaction has been structured as a carve-out of MPH and its subsidiary companies from Seller's broader media conglomerate. The MIPA was negotiated over an approximately two-month period following the execution of a non-binding letter of intent and term sheet on May 3, 2024. The transaction reflects an enterprise value of $480,000,000 and an estimated equity purchase price of $418,000,000, after taking into account estimated indebtedness, transaction expenses, and estimated net working capital adjustments at closing.

The RWI policy supplements and interrelates with the indemnification provisions set forth in Article IX of the MIPA. As described in greater detail below, the policy was structured to align with the key economic terms of the indemnification framework, including the indemnification cap, the tipping basket threshold, and the survival periods applicable to various categories of representations and warranties. The policy was bound on July 22, 2024, three business days after the signing of the MIPA on July 19, 2024. The timing of the binding was coordinated with the execution and delivery of the MIPA and the Seller Disclosure Schedules to ensure that the underwriter had the benefit of the final, executed transaction documents and disclosure materials.

Calderwood & Harkness LLP acts as Seller's counsel in this transaction. Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP (Graham Ashworth, lead partner, and Danielle Ferreira, senior associate) represents the Buyer. Although the RWI policy is a buyer-side policy and was procured by Buyer and its counsel, Calderwood & Harkness LLP has reviewed the binder terms on behalf of Seller, particularly with respect to the subrogation waiver, the treatment of the carve-out separation risks, and the interplay between the policy exclusions and Seller's indemnification obligations under the MIPA. This memorandum reflects our understanding of the policy terms as set forth in the binder issued on July 22, 2024, and should be updated upon receipt of the formal policy wording.

II. Policy Details

A. Carrier and Policy Number

The RWI policy has been placed with the following carrier:

Carrier: Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company Address: 300 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902 Underwriting Contact: David Kowalski, Senior Vice President, Transactional Risk Policy Number: RWI-2024-MPH-00417 Policy Type: Buyer-side representations and warranties insurance policy

Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company is a well-established carrier in the transactional risk insurance market and has underwritten numerous buyer-side RWI policies in connection with middle-market and upper-middle-market private equity transactions. The selection of Kelvantis Fidelity was made by Buyer and Buyer's insurance broker, Ridgeway Benefits Consulting, following a competitive marketing process in which indications were solicited from three carriers. Kelvantis Fidelity provided the most favorable terms on pricing, retention level, and breadth of coverage, and was selected as the lead (and sole) carrier for this placement. No excess tower or co-insurance arrangement was deemed necessary given the aggregate coverage limit of $72,000,000 and the nature and scale of the transaction.

B. Named Insured

The policy identifies the following entities as the Named Insured and Additional Insureds:

Named Insured: Ridgeline Publishing Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation formed for the purpose of acquiring MPH (as Buyer under the MIPA).

Additional Insured (Equity Sponsor): Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners Fund IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and the equity sponsor of the Buyer.

Additional Insured (Lender): Clearwater National Bank, N.A., in its capacity as Administrative Agent and Lead Arranger of the senior secured credit facilities being provided to finance a portion of the acquisition purchase price. The inclusion of Clearwater National Bank, N.A. as an additional insured was a requirement under the commitment letter for the senior secured credit facilities and is consistent with customary lender requirements in leveraged acquisition financings.

The inclusion of the Sponsor and the lead lender as additional insureds is standard in transactions of this nature and ensures that the RWI policy inures to the benefit of the key stakeholders in the acquisition structure. The Buyer, as Named Insured, retains primary control over the policy, including the submission of claims and the management of the claims process, subject to the cooperation obligations described in Section VII below.

C. Coverage Limit

Aggregate Coverage Limit: $72,000,000

The aggregate coverage limit of $72,000,000 was determined by reference to the indemnification cap under the MIPA, which is set at 15% of the $480,000,000 enterprise value (i.e., $480,000,000 × 0.15 = $72,000,000). The alignment of the coverage limit with the indemnification cap is a deliberate structuring decision that provides Buyer with dollar-for-dollar insurance coverage up to the maximum amount recoverable from Seller under the MIPA for breaches of general representations and warranties.

The coverage limit is also coextensive with the Escrow Amount deposited with Granite Trust Company, N.A. pursuant to the Escrow Agreement entered into in connection with the MIPA. At closing, $72,000,000 of the purchase price will be deposited into escrow account reference GT-ESC-2024-11150048, held by Granite Trust Company, N.A. as escrow agent, to secure Seller's indemnification obligations. The escrow amount, the indemnification cap, and the RWI coverage limit are thus fully aligned at $72,000,000, creating a symmetrical risk allocation framework. No excess tower or additional layers of coverage have been procured above the $72,000,000 aggregate limit.

D. Retention.

Retention (Self-Insured Amount): $4,800,000

The retention under the RWI policy is $4,800,000, which is equal to 1% of the enterprise value ($480,000,000 × 0.01 = $4,800,000). This retention matches the tipping basket (also referred to as the deductible or threshold) under the indemnification provisions of the MIPA. The retention represents the amount of covered losses that the Named Insured must absorb before the policy responds.

The retention is to be satisfied first through indemnification recovery from Seller under the MIPA. Specifically, the Named Insured is expected to pursue recovery from the escrow for losses within the retention amount before submitting a claim to the insurer. Once the $4,800,000 threshold is exceeded, the policy responds for losses above the retention up to the aggregate coverage limit of $72,000,000.

It is important to note the distinction between the treatment of the basket under the MIPA and the treatment of the retention under the RWI policy. The MIPA provides a "tipping basket" mechanism — that is, once the aggregate amount of losses exceeds the $4,800,000 threshold, the Buyer may recover indemnification from Seller from dollar one (i.e., the Buyer is entitled to recover the full amount of losses, including the first $4,800,000, not merely the amount in excess of $4,800,000). By contrast, under the RWI policy, the retention functions as a true deductible — the insurer's obligation attaches only to amounts in excess of $4,800,000. This distinction is consistent with market practice for buyer-side RWI policies where the MIPA basket serves as the policy retention. In practical terms, the Named Insured will look to the Seller (through the escrow) for recovery of the first $4,800,000 of losses, and to the insurer for recovery of losses above $4,800,000 up to $72,000,000.

Additionally, the MIPA includes a de minimis per-claim threshold of $250,000, meaning that individual claims for losses below $250,000 do not count toward the tipping basket or the indemnification cap. The de minimis threshold is incorporated into the RWI policy by reference to the MIPA, and losses below the $250,000 per-claim threshold will not count toward satisfaction of the retention.

E. Premium.

Total Premium: $1,800,000 Rate on Limit: 2.5% of the $72,000,000 coverage limit

The total premium for the RWI policy is $1,800,000, which equates to a rate of 2.5% of the $72,000,000 aggregate coverage limit. This rate is within the range of market premiums for buyer-side RWI policies in the current market environment, which generally range from 2.0% to 4.0% of the coverage limit depending on the size, complexity, and risk profile of the transaction. The 2.5% rate reflects the relatively clean due diligence profile of MPH and the absence of material disclosed liabilities or pending litigation matters.

Premium Allocation: The premium is allocated 50/50 between Buyer and Seller, as follows:

• Buyer's share: $900,000

• Seller's share: $900,000

This allocation was negotiated as part of the overall economic terms of the transaction and is memorialized in Section 9.5(d) of the MIPA. The 50/50 premium split is within market norms, though it bears noting that in a significant number of recent transactions — particularly those involving financial sponsor buyers — the Buyer has borne 100% of the premium cost. The allocation in this transaction is therefore relatively favorable to Buyer.

The premium is payable upon binding (i.e., on or about July 22, 2024). The premium is fully earned upon binding and is non-refundable, regardless of whether the transaction closes. In the event that the transaction does not close for any reason, neither party will be entitled to a refund of the premium. Applicable taxes on the premium, if any, are to be borne by each party in proportion to its respective premium share.

F. Policy Period

Inception Date: The Closing Date (expected to be November 15, 2024) Policy Period: 36 months from the Closing Date (i.e., through November 15, 2027)

The policy period commences on the Closing Date and extends for 36 months thereafter. The inception date is tied to the Closing Date rather than the binding date, which is standard for RWI policies — coverage does not attach until the acquisition is consummated and the representations and warranties are brought down at closing.

The 36-month policy period was selected to align with the survival period for Fundamental Representations under the MIPA. The relevant survival periods under the MIPA are as follows:

• General Representations: 18 months from the Closing Date, expiring May 15, 2026.

• Fundamental Representations (including representations relating to title to membership interests, authority, capitalization, tax matters, and brokers): 36 months from the Closing Date, expiring November 15, 2027.

The 36-month policy period thus exceeds the general survival period for representations and warranties under the MIPA by 18 months, but is coextensive with the survival period for Fundamental Representations. This structure ensures that the RWI policy provides continuous coverage throughout the full survival period for all categories of representations, including tail coverage for Fundamental Representation claims that may arise after the general representation survival period has expired.

Claims under the policy must be reported within the policy period. The policy employs a discovery-based reporting trigger, meaning that claims must be reported once the Named Insured becomes aware of facts or circumstances that would reasonably be expected to give rise to a loss covered under the policy. In addition, the policy provides an extended reporting period of 12 months following the expiration of the policy period for claims arising from breaches discovered prior to the expiration of the policy period. This extended reporting period is subject to the terms and conditions of the policy and provides an additional window for the Named Insured to submit claims that were discovered during the policy period but not yet fully developed or reported at the time of expiration.

III. Scope of Coverage

A. Covered Representations and Warranties

The RWI policy covers losses arising from breaches of the representations and warranties made by Seller (Aurelius Media Holdings Inc.) in Article IV of the MIPA, as modified and qualified by the Seller Disclosure Schedules delivered at signing on July 19, 2024. The policy incorporates the MIPA representations by reference and applies the same qualifications, exceptions, and disclosure limitations set forth in the MIPA and the Seller Disclosure Schedules. Accordingly, any matter that was properly disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules and that qualifies or limits a particular representation will not give rise to a covered breach under the policy.

The covered representations include, but are not limited to, the following categories:

• Organization, good standing, and qualification of MPH and its subsidiaries;

• Authority and enforceability of the MIPA and the ancillary transaction documents;

• Capitalization and ownership of membership interests in MPH;

• Financial statements, including the carve-out audited financial statements;

• Absence of undisclosed liabilities;

• Absence of certain changes since the balance sheet date;

• Material contracts and compliance therewith;

• intellectual property ownership, validity, and non-infringement;

• Real property (owned and leased);

• Employee matters, labor relations, and benefit plan compliance (including ERISA compliance);

• Tax matters, including pre-closing tax liabilities and compliance with tax laws;

• Environmental matters and compliance with environmental laws;

• Insurance coverage;

• Litigation and claims;

• Compliance with laws, permits, and licenses; and

• Brokers' and finders' fees.

Fundamental Representations — specifically, the representations relating to title to membership interests, authority and enforceability, capitalization, tax matters, and brokers — are subject to the 36-month survival period under the MIPA and are covered throughout the full 36-month policy period. General representations — that is, all representations other than Fundamental Representations — are subject to the 18-month survival period under the MIPA. The policy covers claims arising from breaches of general representations only to the extent the underlying MIPA survival period has not expired at the time of the breach or, more specifically, at the time the claim is first made or the Named Insured first becomes aware of the facts giving rise to the claim. After expiration of the 18-month survival period on May 15, 2026, the policy will continue to provide coverage only for Fundamental Representation claims through the end of the 36-month policy period on November 15, 2027.

B. Covered Loss

The term "Loss" under the policy is broadly defined and includes the following categories:

• Compensatory damages suffered by the Named Insured or the Company as a result of a breach of a covered representation or warranty;

• Defense costs incurred in connection with the investigation, defense, or resolution of third-party claims arising from a breach of a covered representation or warranty, subject to a sublimit as specified in the policy;

• Amounts payable as indemnification under the MIPA for breaches of covered representations and warranties; and

• Consequential, incidental, and punitive damages, to the extent such damages are recoverable under the indemnification provisions of the MIPA and applicable law.

The inclusion of consequential and incidental damages is noteworthy and reflects a favorable negotiation outcome for the Named Insured. Many RWI policies limit covered losses to direct compensatory damages; the inclusion of consequential and incidental damages expands the scope of coverage and aligns the policy with the broader indemnification provisions of the MIPA, which do not exclude consequential damages.

Pre-closing tax liabilities of MPH and its subsidiaries — namely, Meridian Distribution Services Inc., Bellweather Academic Press Inc., Foxglove Media LLC, and Meridian Press Canada ULC — arising from breaches of the tax representations are covered under the policy, subject to certain tax-specific exclusions discussed in Section IV below. The coverage of pre-closing tax liabilities is particularly significant in the context of a carve-out transaction, where the historical intercompany tax positions of the target company and its affiliates may present exposure that is not fully addressed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules.

IV. Key Exclusions

A. Standard Exclusions

The RWI policy contains the following standard exclusions, which are consistent with market practice for buyer-side RWI policies:

1. Known Breaches / Knowledge Exclusion. The policy does not provide coverage for any breach of a representation or warranty of which the deal team members of the Named Insured had actual knowledge as of the date of the MIPA (July 19, 2024). The knowledge exclusion is the most significant limitation on coverage in any RWI policy, as it precludes recovery for matters that were known to the Buyer's deal team at the time the MIPA was executed, whether or not such matters were disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules.

The individuals identified in the policy as the Named Insured's deal team members whose knowledge is imputed to the Named Insured for purposes of this exclusion are:

• Victor Stanhope (Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners — Managing Director and deal lead);

• Rachel Osei-Mensah (Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners — Vice President);

• Nathaniel Griggs (Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners — Principal);

• Graham Ashworth (Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP — lead partner, Buyer's counsel); and

• Danielle Ferreira (Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP — senior associate, Buyer's counsel).

Knowledge for purposes of this exclusion is defined as actual knowledge, based on information obtained in the course of the transaction due diligence. The due diligence process included, among other things, the quality of earnings analysis performed by Whitecliff & Harding LLP (Susan Cartwright, engagement partner), the legal diligence conducted by Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP, environmental and IP diligence, and review of the Seller Disclosure Schedules. The knowledge exclusion does not extend to constructive knowledge or imputed knowledge — only actual knowledge of the identified deal team members is relevant. This is a favorable formulation for the Named Insured.

2. Fraud by Named Insured. The policy excludes coverage for losses arising from fraud or intentional misrepresentation by the Named Insured. This is a standard exclusion and prevents the Named Insured from recovering under the policy for losses caused by its own fraudulent conduct. It is important to note that this exclusion applies only to fraud by the Named Insured (i.e., the Buyer) — fraud by the Seller is not excluded from coverage under a buyer-side policy, and the Named Insured may recover under the policy for losses caused by Seller fraud, subject to the other terms and conditions of the policy.

3. Purchase Price Adjustments. The policy does not provide coverage for any adjustments to the purchase price pursuant to the net working capital true-up mechanism or other customary post-closing price adjustment mechanisms set forth in the MIPA. The MIPA provides for a net working capital adjustment based on a target of $145,000,000 and an estimated closing net working capital of $142,000,000. A 90-day true-up period applies following the Closing Date, with a deadline of February 13, 2025, for the delivery of the final closing statement. In the event of a dispute regarding the net working capital calculation, Kensington Forensic Advisors LLP has been designated as the neutral accountant to resolve such dispute. The purchase price adjustment exclusion is standard in RWI policies and reflects the principle that working capital adjustments are a pricing mechanism rather than a breach of representation.

4. Forward-Looking and Projections. The policy does not provide coverage for breaches of any covenant, forward-looking statement, or projection. Coverage is limited to representations and warranties as of the signing date (July 19, 2024) and/or the Closing Date (November 15, 2024), as applicable. This exclusion is consistent with the fundamental nature of RWI coverage, which is backward-looking and attaches to the accuracy of historical representations and warranties, not to the achievement of projected financial performance or future operational milestones.

5. Underfunded Pension and Benefit Obligations. The policy excludes coverage for losses relating to underfunded pension or benefit obligations of MPH or its subsidiaries, to the extent such underfunding is not specifically represented in the MIPA. This exclusion addresses the risk that pre-existing shortfalls in pension funding levels could give rise to material liabilities that are not captured by the representations and warranties framework. To the extent that the MIPA contains specific representations regarding the funded status of employee benefit plans, breaches of such representations remain covered; however, the exclusion applies to underfunding that falls outside the scope of the specific representations made.

B. Transaction-Specific Exclusions

In addition to the standard exclusions described above, the RWI policy contains the following exclusions that are specific to the transaction and the particular risk profile of MPH and the carve-out structure:

1. Carve-Out / Separation Risks. The policy does not provide coverage for losses arising from the inadequacy or failure of the separation of MPH's business operations from Aurelius's retained digital media, e-commerce, and streaming operations. This exclusion is significant in the context of this transaction, as MPH has historically operated as an integrated division within the Aurelius corporate group, sharing certain corporate functions, information technology systems, human resources infrastructure, and other services with affiliates. The Transition Services Agreement (the "TSA") entered into between Seller and Buyer in connection with the MIPA provides for the continued delivery of certain shared services by Aurelius to MPH for a period of up to 18 months following the Closing Date, at a monthly fee of $1,190,000. The carve-out exclusion means that losses arising from the failure of the TSA to provide adequate support during the transition period, or from the inherent risks of separating MPH's operations from the Aurelius platform, are not covered by the RWI policy. This is a customary exclusion in carve-out transactions, as underwriters generally view separation risks as operational in nature and outside the scope of representation and warranty coverage.

2. Transfer Pricing. The policy excludes coverage for losses arising from intercompany transfer pricing arrangements between MPH and other Aurelius entities that were in place prior to closing, to the extent such arrangements were disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules. Transfer pricing risk is a common concern in carve-out transactions involving multinational corporate groups, and the exclusion reflects the underwriter's view that disclosed transfer pricing arrangements represent a known risk that is more appropriately addressed through the transaction pricing and the MIPA's indemnification provisions rather than through the RWI policy. Undisclosed transfer pricing arrangements, or transfer pricing arrangements that constitute a breach of a covered representation (e.g., the tax representations), may remain covered to the extent they are not otherwise excluded.

3. Certain Environmental Matters. The policy contains a carve-out for specifically identified pre-existing environmental conditions at four owned distribution centers operated by MPH and its subsidiaries. The facilities subject to this exclusion are:

• 45 Fieldcrest Avenue, Edison, New Jersey;

• 2200 Westbelt Drive, Columbus, Ohio;

• 8700 Freeport Parkway, Dallas, Texas; and

• 1400 Scheels Drive, Reno, Nevada.

The exclusion applies to the extent that the pre-existing environmental conditions at these facilities were disclosed in the applicable environmental schedules to the Seller Disclosure Schedules. This exclusion was imposed by the underwriter based on its review of the environmental due diligence reports, which identified certain legacy contamination and remediation obligations at these sites. Environmental losses arising from conditions not disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules, or at facilities other than the four identified above, remain covered under the policy.

4. Section 338(h)(10) Election. The policy excludes coverage for tax losses arising solely from the making of the joint Section 338(h)(10) election under the Internal Revenue Code. The MIPA contemplates that Buyer and Seller will make a joint election under Section 338(h)(10) of the IRC (and any corresponding elections under state and local tax law) with respect to the acquisition of the membership interests in MPH. The exclusion recognizes that the tax consequences of the Section 338(h)(10) election are a known and intentional component of the transaction structure and should not give rise to covered losses under the policy. Importantly, however, breaches of Seller's tax representations relating to the pre-closing tax attributes of MPH (e.g., representations regarding the accuracy of tax returns, the absence of pending audits, and the proper payment of taxes) remain covered under the policy, notwithstanding the Section 338(h)(10) exclusion. The exclusion is narrowly drawn to apply only to losses arising "solely from" the making of the election itself.

V. Interplay with MIPA Indemnification Provisions

A. Relationship Between RWI and Escrow

The indemnification framework established in Article IX of the MIPA operates in conjunction with, and is supplemented by, the RWI policy. The key elements of the interplay between the MIPA indemnification provisions, the escrow arrangement, and the RWI policy are as follows:

The $72,000,000 escrow held by Granite Trust Company, N.A. (account reference GT-ESC-2024-11150048) secures Seller's indemnification obligations under the MIPA. The escrow amount was established to match the indemnification cap for breaches of general representations and warranties, and Buyer's recovery from the escrow is the primary mechanism for satisfying indemnification claims under the MIPA.

The RWI policy provides an additional, buyer-side recovery mechanism that is independent of the escrow. The policy is a direct obligation of Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company to the Named Insured and does not depend on the availability or sufficiency of the escrow funds. In the event that Seller disputes an indemnification claim or the escrow is insufficient to cover the full amount of a loss, the RWI policy provides an alternative source of recovery for the Named Insured.

Under the MIPA, the Buyer's sole recourse for breaches of general representations is limited to the escrow, subject to the $72,000,000 cap and the $4,800,000 tipping basket, with a $250,000 de minimis per-claim threshold. Claims below $250,000 on an individual basis are excluded from counting toward the tipping basket.

For Fundamental Representations (title to membership interests, authority, capitalization, tax matters, and brokers), the indemnification cap under the MIPA is the full enterprise value of $480,000,000, with a 36-month survival period expiring November 15, 2027. The RWI policy provides coverage for Fundamental Representation claims up to its aggregate coverage limit of $72,000,000, which is less than the uncapped indemnification exposure for Fundamental Representations under the MIPA. Accordingly, for Fundamental Representation claims exceeding $72,000,000, the Named Insured would need to look to Seller's indemnification obligations (beyond the escrow) for the excess.

Fraud and willful misconduct claims are treated separately under both the MIPA and the RWI policy. Under the MIPA, Seller's liability for fraud and willful misconduct is uncapped (subject to a separate cap equal to the total enterprise value of $480,000,000) and is not limited by the general indemnification cap or the escrow amount. Under the RWI policy, fraud by the Seller is not excluded from coverage — a buyer-side policy responds to losses caused by Seller fraud. However, fraud by the Named Insured (i.e., the Buyer) is excluded from the policy, as discussed in Section IV.A.2 above.

B. Subrogation. The RWI policy includes a subrogation waiver in favor of Seller (Aurelius Media Holdings Inc.) and its parent company (Aurelius Global Media Group PLC), together with their respective directors, officers, employees, and agents. The subrogation waiver provides that, following the payment of a claim under the policy, Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company will not pursue subrogation rights against Seller or any of the protected parties for recovery of amounts paid to the Named Insured, except in cases of fraud or willful misconduct by such persons.

The subrogation waiver is a critical feature of the RWI policy from Seller's perspective. It effectively ensures that Seller will not face a "back-door" claim from the insurer after the insurer has paid a claim to the Named Insured. Without the subrogation waiver, the insurer could step into the shoes of the Named Insured and pursue Seller for indemnification under the MIPA to recover amounts paid under the policy — which would defeat the purpose of the RWI policy as a mechanism for providing Seller with a clean exit from its indemnification exposure. The subrogation waiver was a negotiated term and was a condition to Seller's agreement to share in the premium cost. This waiver is consistent with market practice for buyer-side RWI policies and reflects the prevailing expectation in the M&A insurance market.

The fraud and willful misconduct carve-out from the subrogation waiver preserves the insurer's right to pursue Seller in the event that Seller's fraud or willful misconduct caused the loss. This is appropriate, as the subrogation waiver is intended to protect Seller only in circumstances where the breach was not the result of intentional wrongdoing.

C. Priority of Recovery

The RWI policy establishes a clear priority of recovery framework. The Named Insured is required to first seek recovery from the Seller under the MIPA indemnification provisions, up to the retention amount of $4,800,000, before the policy responds. This requirement ensures that the Seller bears the first-dollar exposure for covered losses (through the escrow), and that the insurer's obligation attaches only after the retention has been satisfied.

Once the retention has been satisfied — whether through recovery from the Seller/escrow or through the Named Insured's absorption of the loss — the policy covers losses up to the $72,000,000 aggregate coverage limit. Importantly, the policy does not require exhaustion of the full $72,000,000 escrow as a precondition to coverage; only satisfaction of the $4,800,000 retention is required. This distinction is significant because it means that the Named Insured can access the RWI coverage relatively quickly once the $4,800,000 threshold is exceeded, without being required to fully deplete the escrow before turning to the insurer.

In practice, for losses between $4,800,000 and $72,000,000, the Named Insured will have the ability to pursue recovery from both the escrow (under the MIPA) and the insurer (under the RWI policy), subject to the anti-duplication provisions in the policy and the MIPA, which prevent double recovery. The Named Insured is expected to coordinate recovery efforts between the escrow and the policy to maximize total recovery and avoid over-recovery.

VI. No-Claims Declaration Process

As a condition to the binding of the RWI policy, the Named Insured and the deal team members of the Named Insured were required to deliver a no-claims declaration to Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company. The no-claims declaration was delivered on July 22, 2024, contemporaneously with the binding of the policy, and contained the following certifications:

(a) The Named Insured and its deal team members are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would reasonably be expected to give rise to a claim under the policy as of the date of the declaration.

(b) The due diligence process in connection with the transaction was conducted in a manner customary for transactions of this nature and size. The due diligence included, among other workstreams:

(i) Legal diligence conducted by Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP, including review of material contracts, corporate records, litigation matters, regulatory compliance, and intellectual property;

(ii) Financial and quality of earnings diligence conducted by Whitecliff & Harding LLP (Susan Cartwright, engagement partner), including analysis of historical financial performance, normalization adjustments, and review of working capital trends;

(iii) Environmental diligence, including Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments at the owned distribution centers;

(iv) intellectual property diligence, including review of registered and unregistered IP assets, licensing arrangements, and freedom-to-operate considerations; and

(v) Review of the carve-out audited financial statements delivered by Pemberton Graves LLP (Robert Ainsley, engagement partner) on June 14, 2024, which covered the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023, as well as the stub period ended March 31, 2024.

(c) The Seller Disclosure Schedules have been reviewed by the Named Insured's deal team, and no material items are known to the deal team that were not disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules.

A bring-down no-claims declaration will be required at Closing. The bring-down declaration is expected to be delivered on November 15, 2024, contemporaneously with the closing of the transaction, and will confirm that the certifications made in the initial no-claims declaration remain true and accurate as of the Closing Date. The bring-down declaration is a standard requirement and ensures that the underwriter has the benefit of updated certifications reflecting any developments that may have occurred between signing and closing.

VII. Cooperation Obligations

Named Insured's Obligations

The RWI policy imposes the following cooperation obligations on the Named Insured:

(a) Prompt Notice. The Named Insured is required to provide prompt notice to Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company of any claim or potential claim under the policy. Notice must be provided within the timeframes specified in the policy, which generally require notification within 30 days of the Named Insured becoming aware of a potential claim or of facts or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a claim. Failure to provide timely notice may result in a reduction or denial of coverage, depending on the severity of the delay and whether the insurer was prejudiced by the late notice.

(b) Cooperation in Investigation and Defense. The Named Insured is required to cooperate fully with the insurer in the investigation and defense of any claim, including providing access to relevant documents, personnel, and records of MPH and its subsidiaries. This obligation extends to making available employees, officers, and representatives of the Named Insured and the Company for interviews and depositions, as well as producing documents and information reasonably requested by the insurer.

(c) Settlement Consent. The consent of the insurer is required before the Named Insured may settle any claim in excess of $500,000. This consent requirement ensures that the insurer has the opportunity to evaluate and approve the terms of any material settlement before the Named Insured commits to payment. For claims at or below $500,000, the Named Insured has authority to settle without the insurer's prior consent, though notice of any such settlement must still be provided.

(d) Maintenance of MIPA Indemnification Mechanics. The Named Insured is required to maintain the MIPA's indemnification mechanics in good faith, including pursuing recovery from the escrow for amounts within the retention. The Named Insured may not waive, amend, or modify the indemnification provisions of the MIPA in any manner that would materially prejudice the insurer's rights without the insurer's prior written consent.

Seller's Obligations. Although Seller is not a party to the RWI policy, Seller has certain cooperation obligations under the MIPA that are relevant to the administration of RWI claims:

(a) Seller is obligated under the MIPA to cooperate with Buyer and the R&W insurer in connection with any indemnification claim, to the extent reasonably requested. This cooperation obligation includes providing access to the books and records of MPH for the period prior to closing, making available former employees and officers of MPH for interviews and information requests, and assisting in the preparation of documentation necessary to substantiate claims.

(b) The subrogation waiver described in Section V.B above protects Seller from being pursued by the insurer following the payment of a claim, except in cases of Seller fraud or willful misconduct. This protection is an important incentive for Seller to cooperate in the claims process, as Seller can do so without fear that its cooperation will be used against it in a subsequent subrogation action by the insurer.

VIII. Underwriting Process Summary

The underwriting process for the RWI policy proceeded on the following timeline and involved the following key steps:

The initial submission to Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company was made in early July 2024, following the execution of the non-binding letter of intent and term sheet on May 3, 2024. The submission package included the draft MIPA, a summary of the transaction terms, and a description of the due diligence process undertaken by Buyer and its advisors.

An underwriting diligence call was held with David Kowalski (Kelvantis Fidelity) and representatives of the following parties:

• Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP (Graham Ashworth and Danielle Ferreira) — Buyer's counsel;

• Drummond Zanthor Partners LLC (Philip Arnaud, Managing Director) — Buyer's financial advisor; and

• Whitecliff & Harding LLP (Susan Cartwright, engagement partner) — Buyer's quality of earnings advisor.

During the underwriting diligence call, the participants reviewed the transaction structure, the carve-out mechanics, the key risk areas identified in due diligence, the financial profile of MPH, and the scope of the Seller Disclosure Schedules. Particular attention was given to the carve-out separation risks, the environmental conditions at the owned distribution centers, the transfer pricing arrangements between MPH and other Aurelius entities, and the tax implications of the Section 338(h)(10) election.

Kelvantis Fidelity reviewed the following materials as part of its underwriting process:

• The draft MIPA (near-final form);

• The Seller Disclosure Schedules (initial draft, subsequently updated);

• The carve-out audited financial statements of MPH for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 and the stub period ended March 31, 2024, prepared by Pemberton Graves LLP;

• The quality of earnings report prepared by Whitecliff & Harding LLP;

• Legal due diligence memoranda prepared by Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP;

• Environmental due diligence reports, including Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments; and

• intellectual property due diligence reports.

Following the completion of the underwriting review, Kelvantis Fidelity issued a non-binding indication of terms on July 15, 2024, followed by a formal quote on July 18, 2024. The binder was issued on July 22, 2024, three business days after the signing of the MIPA. The formal policy is expected to be issued within 30 days of binding, and the policy wording will be in the form of the binder with such modifications as may be agreed by the parties during the policy drafting process. Seller's counsel (Calderwood & Harkness LLP) has reserved the right to review the final policy wording to confirm consistency with the binder terms and to verify the scope of the exclusions and the subrogation waiver.

IX. Key Dates Summary

The following table sets forth the key dates relevant to the RWI policy and the underlying transaction:

X. Observations and Recommendations

Based on our review of the RWI binder and the related transaction documents, we offer the following observations and recommendations:

1. The RWI policy is structured in a manner consistent with current market practice for buyer-side policies in middle-market carve-out transactions. The key economic terms — including the coverage limit, retention, premium rate, and policy period — are within the range of terms observed in comparable transactions and reflect a reasonable allocation of risk between the parties and the insurer.

2. The alignment of the coverage limit ($72,000,000) with both the indemnification cap under the MIPA and the escrow amount deposited with Granite Trust Company, N.A. provides a symmetrical risk allocation framework. This alignment simplifies the administration of claims and ensures that the Named Insured's total recovery potential (combining the escrow and the RWI policy) is calibrated to the indemnification exposure established in the MIPA.

3. The retention of $4,800,000, matching the MIPA's tipping basket, ensures that the insurer's exposure commences at the same economic threshold as Seller's indemnification obligation. This alignment is beneficial from both a structural and practical perspective, as it avoids any gap between the MIPA indemnification threshold and the RWI coverage trigger.

4. The 50/50 premium split ($900,000 per party) is within market norms and is favorable to Buyer relative to the growing trend of Buyer-borne premiums. In many recent transactions, particularly those involving financial sponsor buyers, the Buyer has borne 100% of the premium cost, making the 50/50 allocation a positive outcome for Pinnacle Ridge.

5. The subrogation waiver in favor of Seller is an important protection for Aurelius Media Holdings Inc. and Aurelius Global Media Group PLC. The waiver ensures that Seller will not face claims from the insurer following the payment of a covered loss, subject to the fraud and willful misconduct carve-out. Seller's counsel (Calderwood & Harkness LLP) should confirm that the subrogation waiver is reflected in the final policy wording in a manner consistent with the binder terms and should verify that the scope of the protected parties (including directors, officers, employees, and agents of Seller and its parent) is sufficiently broad.

6. Seller's counsel should review the final issued policy when it becomes available (expected within 30 days of binding) to confirm consistency with the binder terms summarized in this memorandum. Particular attention should be paid to the following areas:

(a) The exclusion for carve-out/separation risks (Section IV.B.1), to confirm that the scope of the exclusion is appropriately limited and does not inadvertently capture losses arising from breaches of representations and warranties that relate to MPH's standalone operations (as distinct from the separation process itself);

(b) The exclusion for Section 338(h)(10) election-related tax matters (Section IV.B.4), to confirm that the exclusion is narrowly drawn and does not preclude recovery for breaches of Seller's pre-closing tax representations;

(c) The subrogation waiver provisions, to confirm that the waiver is unconditional (except for the fraud/willful misconduct carve-out) and extends to all protected parties identified in the binder; and

(d) The definition of "Loss" and the treatment of consequential, incidental, and punitive damages, to confirm that the final policy wording is consistent with the binder terms and the MIPA's indemnification provisions.

7. The policy's 36-month term provides tail coverage beyond the general representation survival period (which expires 18 months post-closing on May 15, 2026), which is beneficial for Buyer's protection on Fundamental Representation claims. The extended reporting period of 12 months following policy expiration provides additional protection for claims discovered near the end of the policy period.

8. No further action is required by Seller at this time with respect to the RWI policy. The bring-down no-claims declaration and the formal policy issuance are the next key milestones, both of which are expected to occur at or around the Closing Date.

XI. Attachments / Cross-References

The following documents are attached to or cross-referenced in this memorandum and should be maintained in the matter file:

Attachment A: Copy of R&W Insurance Binder (Policy No. RWI-2024-MPH-00417) issued by Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company on July 22, 2024 — to be maintained in the matter file (Matter No. 1043-00002).

Cross-Reference: Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (Execution Version, dated July 19, 2024) — Article IX (Indemnification), together with the Seller Disclosure Schedules.

Cross-Reference: Escrow Agreement (to be effective November 15, 2024) — among Seller, Buyer, and Granite Trust Company, N.A. as escrow agent, account reference GT-ESC-2024-11150048.

Cross-Reference: Indemnification and Escrow Terms Memorandum (M. Chu to B. Holloway and J. Prentice, dated June 20, 2024), which provides a detailed analysis of the negotiation and structuring of the indemnification provisions in the MIPA and the related escrow arrangement.

This memorandum is prepared for the internal files of Calderwood & Harkness LLP and for the benefit of our client, Aurelius Media Holdings Inc. The analysis set forth herein is based on our review of the RWI binder and related transaction documents as of the date hereof and is subject to update upon receipt of the formal policy wording.

Prepared by:

________________________________________

Megan Chu Lead Associate, Mergers & Acquisitions Calderwood & Harkness LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022

Reviewed by:

________________________________________

Beatrice Holloway Responsible Partner, Mergers & Acquisitions Calderwood & Harkness LLP

Item	Date
MIPA Signing	July 19, 2024
R&W Policy Bound	July 22, 2024
Premium Payment Due	Upon binding (July 22, 2024)
Closing Date / Policy Inception	November 15, 2024
Bring-Down No-Claims Declaration	November 15, 2024 (at Closing)
Net Working Capital True-Up Deadline	February 13, 2025 (90 days post-closing)
General Representation Survival Expiry	May 15, 2026 (18 months post-closing)
Policy Expiry / Fundamental Representation Survival Expiry	November 15, 2027 (36 months post-closing)
Extended Reporting Period Expiry	November 15, 2028 (12 months after policy expiry)

MEMORANDUM
TO: File — Matter No. 1043-00002
FROM: Megan Chu, Calderwood & Harkness LLP
DATE: July 22, 2024
RE: Representations and Warranties Insurance — Coverage Summary; Sale of Meridian Press Holdings LLC
CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT / ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED
This memorandum has been prepared by Calderwood & Harkness LLP and is protected by the attorney work product doctrine and the attorney-client privilege. This memorandum is intended solely for internal use and for the benefit of our client, Aurelius Media Holdings Inc. It should not be disclosed to any third party without the prior written consent of this firm.
I. Purpose and Background
This memorandum to file summarizes the material terms, conditions, and exclusions of the representations and warranties insurance ("R&W Insurance" or "RWI") policy bound on July 22, 2024, in connection with the carve-out and sale of 100% of the membership interests in Meridian Press Holdings LLC ("MPH" or the "Company") by Aurelius Media Holdings Inc. ("Seller") to Ridgeline Publishing Acquisition Corp. ("Buyer"), a newly formed acquisition vehicle of Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners Fund IV, L.P. (the "Sponsor" or "Pinnacle Ridge"). The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a comprehensive reference document for the matter file, documenting the key coverage parameters of the RWI policy and the interplay between the policy and the indemnification framework established in the definitive acquisition agreement.
The transaction is governed by the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the "MIPA") dated July 19, 2024, pursuant to which Seller agreed to sell, and Buyer agreed to purchase, all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of MPH. The transaction has been structured as a carve-out of MPH and its subsidiary companies from Seller's broader media conglomerate. The MIPA was negotiated over an approximately two-month period following the execution of a non-binding letter of intent and term sheet on May 3, 2024. The transaction reflects an enterprise value of $480,000,000 and an estimated equity purchase price of $418,000,000, after taking into account estimated indebtedness, transaction expenses, and estimated net working capital adjustments at closing.
The RWI policy supplements and interrelates with the indemnification provisions set forth in Article IX of the MIPA. As described in greater detail below, the policy was structured to align with the key economic terms of the indemnification framework, including the indemnification cap, the tipping basket threshold, and the survival periods applicable to various categories of representations and warranties. The policy was bound on July 22, 2024, three business days after the signing of the MIPA on July 19, 2024. The timing of the binding was coordinated with the execution and delivery of the MIPA and the Seller Disclosure Schedules to ensure that the underwriter had the benefit of the final, executed transaction documents and disclosure materials.
Calderwood & Harkness LLP acts as Seller's counsel in this transaction. Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP (Graham Ashworth, lead partner, and Danielle Ferreira, senior associate) represents the Buyer. Although the RWI policy is a buyer-side policy and was procured by Buyer and its counsel, Calderwood & Harkness LLP has reviewed the binder terms on behalf of Seller, particularly with respect to the subrogation waiver, the treatment of the carve-out separation risks, and the interplay between the policy exclusions and Seller's indemnification obligations under the MIPA. This memorandum reflects our understanding of the policy terms as set forth in the binder issued on July 22, 2024, and should be updated upon receipt of the formal policy wording.
II. Policy Details
A. Carrier and Policy Number
The RWI policy has been placed with the following carrier:
Carrier: Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company Address: 300 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902 Underwriting Contact: David Kowalski, Senior Vice President, Transactional Risk Policy Number: RWI-2024-MPH-00417 Policy Type: Buyer-side representations and warranties insurance policy
Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company is a well-established carrier in the transactional risk insurance market and has underwritten numerous buyer-side RWI policies in connection with middle-market and upper-middle-market private equity transactions. The selection of Kelvantis Fidelity was made by Buyer and Buyer's insurance broker, Ridgeway Benefits Consulting, following a competitive marketing process in which indications were solicited from three carriers. Kelvantis Fidelity provided the most favorable terms on pricing, retention level, and breadth of coverage, and was selected as the lead (and sole) carrier for this placement. No excess tower or co-insurance arrangement was deemed necessary given the aggregate coverage limit of $72,000,000 and the nature and scale of the transaction.
B. Named Insured
The policy identifies the following entities as the Named Insured and Additional Insureds:
Named Insured: Ridgeline Publishing Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation formed for the purpose of acquiring MPH (as Buyer under the MIPA).
Additional Insured (Equity Sponsor): Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners Fund IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and the equity sponsor of the Buyer.
Additional Insured (Lender): Clearwater National Bank, N.A., in its capacity as Administrative Agent and Lead Arranger of the senior secured credit facilities being provided to finance a portion of the acquisition purchase price. The inclusion of Clearwater National Bank, N.A. as an additional insured was a requirement under the commitment letter for the senior secured credit facilities and is consistent with customary lender requirements in leveraged acquisition financings.
The inclusion of the Sponsor and the lead lender as additional insureds is standard in transactions of this nature and ensures that the RWI policy inures to the benefit of the key stakeholders in the acquisition structure. The Buyer, as Named Insured, retains primary control over the policy, including the submission of claims and the management of the claims process, subject to the cooperation obligations described in Section VII below.
C. Coverage Limit
Aggregate Coverage Limit: $72,000,000
The aggregate coverage limit of $72,000,000 was determined by reference to the indemnification cap under the MIPA, which is set at 15% of the $480,000,000 enterprise value (i.e., $480,000,000 × 0.15 = $72,000,000). The alignment of the coverage limit with the indemnification cap is a deliberate structuring decision that provides Buyer with dollar-for-dollar insurance coverage up to the maximum amount recoverable from Seller under the MIPA for breaches of general representations and warranties.
The coverage limit is also coextensive with the Escrow Amount deposited with Granite Trust Company, N.A. pursuant to the Escrow Agreement entered into in connection with the MIPA. At closing, $72,000,000 of the purchase price will be deposited into escrow account reference GT-ESC-2024-11150048, held by Granite Trust Company, N.A. as escrow agent, to secure Seller's indemnification obligations. The escrow amount, the indemnification cap, and the RWI coverage limit are thus fully aligned at $72,000,000, creating a symmetrical risk allocation framework. No excess tower or additional layers of coverage have been procured above the $72,000,000 aggregate limit.
D. Retention.
Retention (Self-Insured Amount): $4,800,000
The retention under the RWI policy is $4,800,000, which is equal to 1% of the enterprise value ($480,000,000 × 0.01 = $4,800,000). This retention matches the tipping basket (also referred to as the deductible or threshold) under the indemnification provisions of the MIPA. The retention represents the amount of covered losses that the Named Insured must absorb before the policy responds.
The retention is to be satisfied first through indemnification recovery from Seller under the MIPA. Specifically, the Named Insured is expected to pursue recovery from the escrow for losses within the retention amount before submitting a claim to the insurer. Once the $4,800,000 threshold is exceeded, the policy responds for losses above the retention up to the aggregate coverage limit of $72,000,000.
It is important to note the distinction between the treatment of the basket under the MIPA and the treatment of the retention under the RWI policy. The MIPA provides a "tipping basket" mechanism — that is, once the aggregate amount of losses exceeds the $4,800,000 threshold, the Buyer may recover indemnification from Seller from dollar one (i.e., the Buyer is entitled to recover the full amount of losses, including the first $4,800,000, not merely the amount in excess of $4,800,000). By contrast, under the RWI policy, the retention functions as a true deductible — the insurer's obligation attaches only to amounts in excess of $4,800,000. This distinction is consistent with market practice for buyer-side RWI policies where the MIPA basket serves as the policy retention. In practical terms, the Named Insured will look to the Seller (through the escrow) for recovery of the first $4,800,000 of losses, and to the insurer for recovery of losses above $4,800,000 up to $72,000,000.
Additionally, the MIPA includes a de minimis per-claim threshold of $250,000, meaning that individual claims for losses below $250,000 do not count toward the tipping basket or the indemnification cap. The de minimis threshold is incorporated into the RWI policy by reference to the MIPA, and losses below the $250,000 per-claim threshold will not count toward satisfaction of the retention.
E. Premium.
Total Premium: $1,800,000 Rate on Limit: 2.5% of the $72,000,000 coverage limit
The total premium for the RWI policy is $1,800,000, which equates to a rate of 2.5% of the $72,000,000 aggregate coverage limit. This rate is within the range of market premiums for buyer-side RWI policies in the current market environment, which generally range from 2.0% to 4.0% of the coverage limit depending on the size, complexity, and risk profile of the transaction. The 2.5% rate reflects the relatively clean due diligence profile of MPH and the absence of material disclosed liabilities or pending litigation matters.
Premium Allocation: The premium is allocated 50/50 between Buyer and Seller, as follows:
• Buyer's share: $900,000
• Seller's share: $900,000
This allocation was negotiated as part of the overall economic terms of the transaction and is memorialized in Section 9.5(d) of the MIPA. The 50/50 premium split is within market norms, though it bears noting that in a significant number of recent transactions — particularly those involving financial sponsor buyers — the Buyer has borne 100% of the premium cost. The allocation in this transaction is therefore relatively favorable to Buyer.
The premium is payable upon binding (i.e., on or about July 22, 2024). The premium is fully earned upon binding and is non-refundable, regardless of whether the transaction closes. In the event that the transaction does not close for any reason, neither party will be entitled to a refund of the premium. Applicable taxes on the premium, if any, are to be borne by each party in proportion to its respective premium share.
F. Policy Period
Inception Date: The Closing Date (expected to be November 15, 2024) Policy Period: 36 months from the Closing Date (i.e., through November 15, 2027)
The policy period commences on the Closing Date and extends for 36 months thereafter. The inception date is tied to the Closing Date rather than the binding date, which is standard for RWI policies — coverage does not attach until the acquisition is consummated and the representations and warranties are brought down at closing.
The 36-month policy period was selected to align with the survival period for Fundamental Representations under the MIPA. The relevant survival periods under the MIPA are as follows:
• General Representations: 18 months from the Closing Date, expiring May 15, 2026.
• Fundamental Representations (including representations relating to title to membership interests, authority, capitalization, tax matters, and brokers): 36 months from the Closing Date, expiring November 15, 2027.
The 36-month policy period thus exceeds the general survival period for representations and warranties under the MIPA by 18 months, but is coextensive with the survival period for Fundamental Representations. This structure ensures that the RWI policy provides continuous coverage throughout the full survival period for all categories of representations, including tail coverage for Fundamental Representation claims that may arise after the general representation survival period has expired.
Claims under the policy must be reported within the policy period. The policy employs a discovery-based reporting trigger, meaning that claims must be reported once the Named Insured becomes aware of facts or circumstances that would reasonably be expected to give rise to a loss covered under the policy. In addition, the policy provides an extended reporting period of 12 months following the expiration of the policy period for claims arising from breaches discovered prior to the expiration of the policy period. This extended reporting period is subject to the terms and conditions of the policy and provides an additional window for the Named Insured to submit claims that were discovered during the policy period but not yet fully developed or reported at the time of expiration.
III. Scope of Coverage
A. Covered Representations and Warranties
The RWI policy covers losses arising from breaches of the representations and warranties made by Seller (Aurelius Media Holdings Inc.) in Article IV of the MIPA, as modified and qualified by the Seller Disclosure Schedules delivered at signing on July 19, 2024. The policy incorporates the MIPA representations by reference and applies the same qualifications, exceptions, and disclosure limitations set forth in the MIPA and the Seller Disclosure Schedules. Accordingly, any matter that was properly disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules and that qualifies or limits a particular representation will not give rise to a covered breach under the policy.
The covered representations include, but are not limited to, the following categories:
• Organization, good standing, and qualification of MPH and its subsidiaries;
• Authority and enforceability of the MIPA and the ancillary transaction documents;
• Capitalization and ownership of membership interests in MPH;
• Financial statements, including the carve-out audited financial statements;
• Absence of undisclosed liabilities;
• Absence of certain changes since the balance sheet date;
• Material contracts and compliance therewith;
• intellectual property ownership, validity, and non-infringement;
• Real property (owned and leased);
• Employee matters, labor relations, and benefit plan compliance (including ERISA compliance);
• Tax matters, including pre-closing tax liabilities and compliance with tax laws;
• Environmental matters and compliance with environmental laws;
• Insurance coverage;
• Litigation and claims;
• Compliance with laws, permits, and licenses; and
• Brokers' and finders' fees.
Fundamental Representations — specifically, the representations relating to title to membership interests, authority and enforceability, capitalization, tax matters, and brokers — are subject to the 36-month survival period under the MIPA and are covered throughout the full 36-month policy period. General representations — that is, all representations other than Fundamental Representations — are subject to the 18-month survival period under the MIPA. The policy covers claims arising from breaches of general representations only to the extent the underlying MIPA survival period has not expired at the time of the breach or, more specifically, at the time the claim is first made or the Named Insured first becomes aware of the facts giving rise to the claim. After expiration of the 18-month survival period on May 15, 2026, the policy will continue to provide coverage only for Fundamental Representation claims through the end of the 36-month policy period on November 15, 2027.
B. Covered Loss
The term "Loss" under the policy is broadly defined and includes the following categories:
• Compensatory damages suffered by the Named Insured or the Company as a result of a breach of a covered representation or warranty;
• Defense costs incurred in connection with the investigation, defense, or resolution of third-party claims arising from a breach of a covered representation or warranty, subject to a sublimit as specified in the policy;
• Amounts payable as indemnification under the MIPA for breaches of covered representations and warranties; and
• Consequential, incidental, and punitive damages, to the extent such damages are recoverable under the indemnification provisions of the MIPA and applicable law.
The inclusion of consequential and incidental damages is noteworthy and reflects a favorable negotiation outcome for the Named Insured. Many RWI policies limit covered losses to direct compensatory damages; the inclusion of consequential and incidental damages expands the scope of coverage and aligns the policy with the broader indemnification provisions of the MIPA, which do not exclude consequential damages.
Pre-closing tax liabilities of MPH and its subsidiaries — namely, Meridian Distribution Services Inc., Bellweather Academic Press Inc., Foxglove Media LLC, and Meridian Press Canada ULC — arising from breaches of the tax representations are covered under the policy, subject to certain tax-specific exclusions discussed in Section IV below. The coverage of pre-closing tax liabilities is particularly significant in the context of a carve-out transaction, where the historical intercompany tax positions of the target company and its affiliates may present exposure that is not fully addressed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules.
IV. Key Exclusions
A. Standard Exclusions
The RWI policy contains the following standard exclusions, which are consistent with market practice for buyer-side RWI policies:
1. Known Breaches / Knowledge Exclusion. The policy does not provide coverage for any breach of a representation or warranty of which the deal team members of the Named Insured had actual knowledge as of the date of the MIPA (July 19, 2024). The knowledge exclusion is the most significant limitation on coverage in any RWI policy, as it precludes recovery for matters that were known to the Buyer's deal team at the time the MIPA was executed, whether or not such matters were disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules.
The individuals identified in the policy as the Named Insured's deal team members whose knowledge is imputed to the Named Insured for purposes of this exclusion are:
• Victor Stanhope (Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners — Managing Director and deal lead);
• Rachel Osei-Mensah (Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners — Vice President);
• Nathaniel Griggs (Pinnacle Ridge Capital Partners — Principal);
• Graham Ashworth (Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP — lead partner, Buyer's counsel); and
• Danielle Ferreira (Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP — senior associate, Buyer's counsel).
Knowledge for purposes of this exclusion is defined as actual knowledge, based on information obtained in the course of the transaction due diligence. The due diligence process included, among other things, the quality of earnings analysis performed by Whitecliff & Harding LLP (Susan Cartwright, engagement partner), the legal diligence conducted by Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP, environmental and IP diligence, and review of the Seller Disclosure Schedules. The knowledge exclusion does not extend to constructive knowledge or imputed knowledge — only actual knowledge of the identified deal team members is relevant. This is a favorable formulation for the Named Insured.
2. Fraud by Named Insured. The policy excludes coverage for losses arising from fraud or intentional misrepresentation by the Named Insured. This is a standard exclusion and prevents the Named Insured from recovering under the policy for losses caused by its own fraudulent conduct. It is important to note that this exclusion applies only to fraud by the Named Insured (i.e., the Buyer) — fraud by the Seller is not excluded from coverage under a buyer-side policy, and the Named Insured may recover under the policy for losses caused by Seller fraud, subject to the other terms and conditions of the policy.
3. Purchase Price Adjustments. The policy does not provide coverage for any adjustments to the purchase price pursuant to the net working capital true-up mechanism or other customary post-closing price adjustment mechanisms set forth in the MIPA. The MIPA provides for a net working capital adjustment based on a target of $145,000,000 and an estimated closing net working capital of $142,000,000. A 90-day true-up period applies following the Closing Date, with a deadline of February 13, 2025, for the delivery of the final closing statement. In the event of a dispute regarding the net working capital calculation, Kensington Forensic Advisors LLP has been designated as the neutral accountant to resolve such dispute. The purchase price adjustment exclusion is standard in RWI policies and reflects the principle that working capital adjustments are a pricing mechanism rather than a breach of representation.
4. Forward-Looking and Projections. The policy does not provide coverage for breaches of any covenant, forward-looking statement, or projection. Coverage is limited to representations and warranties as of the signing date (July 19, 2024) and/or the Closing Date (November 15, 2024), as applicable. This exclusion is consistent with the fundamental nature of RWI coverage, which is backward-looking and attaches to the accuracy of historical representations and warranties, not to the achievement of projected financial performance or future operational milestones.
5. Underfunded Pension and Benefit Obligations. The policy excludes coverage for losses relating to underfunded pension or benefit obligations of MPH or its subsidiaries, to the extent such underfunding is not specifically represented in the MIPA. This exclusion addresses the risk that pre-existing shortfalls in pension funding levels could give rise to material liabilities that are not captured by the representations and warranties framework. To the extent that the MIPA contains specific representations regarding the funded status of employee benefit plans, breaches of such representations remain covered; however, the exclusion applies to underfunding that falls outside the scope of the specific representations made.
B. Transaction-Specific Exclusions
In addition to the standard exclusions described above, the RWI policy contains the following exclusions that are specific to the transaction and the particular risk profile of MPH and the carve-out structure:
1. Carve-Out / Separation Risks. The policy does not provide coverage for losses arising from the inadequacy or failure of the separation of MPH's business operations from Aurelius's retained digital media, e-commerce, and streaming operations. This exclusion is significant in the context of this transaction, as MPH has historically operated as an integrated division within the Aurelius corporate group, sharing certain corporate functions, information technology systems, human resources infrastructure, and other services with affiliates. The Transition Services Agreement (the "TSA") entered into between Seller and Buyer in connection with the MIPA provides for the continued delivery of certain shared services by Aurelius to MPH for a period of up to 18 months following the Closing Date, at a monthly fee of $1,190,000. The carve-out exclusion means that losses arising from the failure of the TSA to provide adequate support during the transition period, or from the inherent risks of separating MPH's operations from the Aurelius platform, are not covered by the RWI policy. This is a customary exclusion in carve-out transactions, as underwriters generally view separation risks as operational in nature and outside the scope of representation and warranty coverage.
2. Transfer Pricing. The policy excludes coverage for losses arising from intercompany transfer pricing arrangements between MPH and other Aurelius entities that were in place prior to closing, to the extent such arrangements were disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules. Transfer pricing risk is a common concern in carve-out transactions involving multinational corporate groups, and the exclusion reflects the underwriter's view that disclosed transfer pricing arrangements represent a known risk that is more appropriately addressed through the transaction pricing and the MIPA's indemnification provisions rather than through the RWI policy. Undisclosed transfer pricing arrangements, or transfer pricing arrangements that constitute a breach of a covered representation (e.g., the tax representations), may remain covered to the extent they are not otherwise excluded.
3. Certain Environmental Matters. The policy contains a carve-out for specifically identified pre-existing environmental conditions at four owned distribution centers operated by MPH and its subsidiaries. The facilities subject to this exclusion are:
• 45 Fieldcrest Avenue, Edison, New Jersey;
• 2200 Westbelt Drive, Columbus, Ohio;
• 8700 Freeport Parkway, Dallas, Texas; and
• 1400 Scheels Drive, Reno, Nevada.
The exclusion applies to the extent that the pre-existing environmental conditions at these facilities were disclosed in the applicable environmental schedules to the Seller Disclosure Schedules. This exclusion was imposed by the underwriter based on its review of the environmental due diligence reports, which identified certain legacy contamination and remediation obligations at these sites. Environmental losses arising from conditions not disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules, or at facilities other than the four identified above, remain covered under the policy.
4. Section 338(h)(10) Election. The policy excludes coverage for tax losses arising solely from the making of the joint Section 338(h)(10) election under the Internal Revenue Code. The MIPA contemplates that Buyer and Seller will make a joint election under Section 338(h)(10) of the IRC (and any corresponding elections under state and local tax law) with respect to the acquisition of the membership interests in MPH. The exclusion recognizes that the tax consequences of the Section 338(h)(10) election are a known and intentional component of the transaction structure and should not give rise to covered losses under the policy. Importantly, however, breaches of Seller's tax representations relating to the pre-closing tax attributes of MPH (e.g., representations regarding the accuracy of tax returns, the absence of pending audits, and the proper payment of taxes) remain covered under the policy, notwithstanding the Section 338(h)(10) exclusion. The exclusion is narrowly drawn to apply only to losses arising "solely from" the making of the election itself.
V. Interplay with MIPA Indemnification Provisions
A. Relationship Between RWI and Escrow
The indemnification framework established in Article IX of the MIPA operates in conjunction with, and is supplemented by, the RWI policy. The key elements of the interplay between the MIPA indemnification provisions, the escrow arrangement, and the RWI policy are as follows:
The $72,000,000 escrow held by Granite Trust Company, N.A. (account reference GT-ESC-2024-11150048) secures Seller's indemnification obligations under the MIPA. The escrow amount was established to match the indemnification cap for breaches of general representations and warranties, and Buyer's recovery from the escrow is the primary mechanism for satisfying indemnification claims under the MIPA.
The RWI policy provides an additional, buyer-side recovery mechanism that is independent of the escrow. The policy is a direct obligation of Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company to the Named Insured and does not depend on the availability or sufficiency of the escrow funds. In the event that Seller disputes an indemnification claim or the escrow is insufficient to cover the full amount of a loss, the RWI policy provides an alternative source of recovery for the Named Insured.
Under the MIPA, the Buyer's sole recourse for breaches of general representations is limited to the escrow, subject to the $72,000,000 cap and the $4,800,000 tipping basket, with a $250,000 de minimis per-claim threshold. Claims below $250,000 on an individual basis are excluded from counting toward the tipping basket.
For Fundamental Representations (title to membership interests, authority, capitalization, tax matters, and brokers), the indemnification cap under the MIPA is the full enterprise value of $480,000,000, with a 36-month survival period expiring November 15, 2027. The RWI policy provides coverage for Fundamental Representation claims up to its aggregate coverage limit of $72,000,000, which is less than the uncapped indemnification exposure for Fundamental Representations under the MIPA. Accordingly, for Fundamental Representation claims exceeding $72,000,000, the Named Insured would need to look to Seller's indemnification obligations (beyond the escrow) for the excess.
Fraud and willful misconduct claims are treated separately under both the MIPA and the RWI policy. Under the MIPA, Seller's liability for fraud and willful misconduct is uncapped (subject to a separate cap equal to the total enterprise value of $480,000,000) and is not limited by the general indemnification cap or the escrow amount. Under the RWI policy, fraud by the Seller is not excluded from coverage — a buyer-side policy responds to losses caused by Seller fraud. However, fraud by the Named Insured (i.e., the Buyer) is excluded from the policy, as discussed in Section IV.A.2 above.
B. Subrogation. The RWI policy includes a subrogation waiver in favor of Seller (Aurelius Media Holdings Inc.) and its parent company (Aurelius Global Media Group PLC), together with their respective directors, officers, employees, and agents. The subrogation waiver provides that, following the payment of a claim under the policy, Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company will not pursue subrogation rights against Seller or any of the protected parties for recovery of amounts paid to the Named Insured, except in cases of fraud or willful misconduct by such persons.
The subrogation waiver is a critical feature of the RWI policy from Seller's perspective. It effectively ensures that Seller will not face a "back-door" claim from the insurer after the insurer has paid a claim to the Named Insured. Without the subrogation waiver, the insurer could step into the shoes of the Named Insured and pursue Seller for indemnification under the MIPA to recover amounts paid under the policy — which would defeat the purpose of the RWI policy as a mechanism for providing Seller with a clean exit from its indemnification exposure. The subrogation waiver was a negotiated term and was a condition to Seller's agreement to share in the premium cost. This waiver is consistent with market practice for buyer-side RWI policies and reflects the prevailing expectation in the M&A insurance market.
The fraud and willful misconduct carve-out from the subrogation waiver preserves the insurer's right to pursue Seller in the event that Seller's fraud or willful misconduct caused the loss. This is appropriate, as the subrogation waiver is intended to protect Seller only in circumstances where the breach was not the result of intentional wrongdoing.
C. Priority of Recovery
The RWI policy establishes a clear priority of recovery framework. The Named Insured is required to first seek recovery from the Seller under the MIPA indemnification provisions, up to the retention amount of $4,800,000, before the policy responds. This requirement ensures that the Seller bears the first-dollar exposure for covered losses (through the escrow), and that the insurer's obligation attaches only after the retention has been satisfied.
Once the retention has been satisfied — whether through recovery from the Seller/escrow or through the Named Insured's absorption of the loss — the policy covers losses up to the $72,000,000 aggregate coverage limit. Importantly, the policy does not require exhaustion of the full $72,000,000 escrow as a precondition to coverage; only satisfaction of the $4,800,000 retention is required. This distinction is significant because it means that the Named Insured can access the RWI coverage relatively quickly once the $4,800,000 threshold is exceeded, without being required to fully deplete the escrow before turning to the insurer.
In practice, for losses between $4,800,000 and $72,000,000, the Named Insured will have the ability to pursue recovery from both the escrow (under the MIPA) and the insurer (under the RWI policy), subject to the anti-duplication provisions in the policy and the MIPA, which prevent double recovery. The Named Insured is expected to coordinate recovery efforts between the escrow and the policy to maximize total recovery and avoid over-recovery.
VI. No-Claims Declaration Process
As a condition to the binding of the RWI policy, the Named Insured and the deal team members of the Named Insured were required to deliver a no-claims declaration to Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company. The no-claims declaration was delivered on July 22, 2024, contemporaneously with the binding of the policy, and contained the following certifications:
(a) The Named Insured and its deal team members are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would reasonably be expected to give rise to a claim under the policy as of the date of the declaration.
(b) The due diligence process in connection with the transaction was conducted in a manner customary for transactions of this nature and size. The due diligence included, among other workstreams:
(i) Legal diligence conducted by Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP, including review of material contracts, corporate records, litigation matters, regulatory compliance, and intellectual property;
(ii) Financial and quality of earnings diligence conducted by Whitecliff & Harding LLP (Susan Cartwright, engagement partner), including analysis of historical financial performance, normalization adjustments, and review of working capital trends;
(iii) Environmental diligence, including Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments at the owned distribution centers;
(iv) intellectual property diligence, including review of registered and unregistered IP assets, licensing arrangements, and freedom-to-operate considerations; and
(v) Review of the carve-out audited financial statements delivered by Pemberton Graves LLP (Robert Ainsley, engagement partner) on June 14, 2024, which covered the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023, as well as the stub period ended March 31, 2024.
(c) The Seller Disclosure Schedules have been reviewed by the Named Insured's deal team, and no material items are known to the deal team that were not disclosed in the Seller Disclosure Schedules.
A bring-down no-claims declaration will be required at Closing. The bring-down declaration is expected to be delivered on November 15, 2024, contemporaneously with the closing of the transaction, and will confirm that the certifications made in the initial no-claims declaration remain true and accurate as of the Closing Date. The bring-down declaration is a standard requirement and ensures that the underwriter has the benefit of updated certifications reflecting any developments that may have occurred between signing and closing.
VII. Cooperation Obligations
Named Insured's Obligations
The RWI policy imposes the following cooperation obligations on the Named Insured:
(a) Prompt Notice. The Named Insured is required to provide prompt notice to Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company of any claim or potential claim under the policy. Notice must be provided within the timeframes specified in the policy, which generally require notification within 30 days of the Named Insured becoming aware of a potential claim or of facts or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a claim. Failure to provide timely notice may result in a reduction or denial of coverage, depending on the severity of the delay and whether the insurer was prejudiced by the late notice.
(b) Cooperation in Investigation and Defense. The Named Insured is required to cooperate fully with the insurer in the investigation and defense of any claim, including providing access to relevant documents, personnel, and records of MPH and its subsidiaries. This obligation extends to making available employees, officers, and representatives of the Named Insured and the Company for interviews and depositions, as well as producing documents and information reasonably requested by the insurer.
(c) Settlement Consent. The consent of the insurer is required before the Named Insured may settle any claim in excess of $500,000. This consent requirement ensures that the insurer has the opportunity to evaluate and approve the terms of any material settlement before the Named Insured commits to payment. For claims at or below $500,000, the Named Insured has authority to settle without the insurer's prior consent, though notice of any such settlement must still be provided.
(d) Maintenance of MIPA Indemnification Mechanics. The Named Insured is required to maintain the MIPA's indemnification mechanics in good faith, including pursuing recovery from the escrow for amounts within the retention. The Named Insured may not waive, amend, or modify the indemnification provisions of the MIPA in any manner that would materially prejudice the insurer's rights without the insurer's prior written consent.
Seller's Obligations. Although Seller is not a party to the RWI policy, Seller has certain cooperation obligations under the MIPA that are relevant to the administration of RWI claims:
(a) Seller is obligated under the MIPA to cooperate with Buyer and the R&W insurer in connection with any indemnification claim, to the extent reasonably requested. This cooperation obligation includes providing access to the books and records of MPH for the period prior to closing, making available former employees and officers of MPH for interviews and information requests, and assisting in the preparation of documentation necessary to substantiate claims.
(b) The subrogation waiver described in Section V.B above protects Seller from being pursued by the insurer following the payment of a claim, except in cases of Seller fraud or willful misconduct. This protection is an important incentive for Seller to cooperate in the claims process, as Seller can do so without fear that its cooperation will be used against it in a subsequent subrogation action by the insurer.
VIII. Underwriting Process Summary
The underwriting process for the RWI policy proceeded on the following timeline and involved the following key steps:
The initial submission to Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company was made in early July 2024, following the execution of the non-binding letter of intent and term sheet on May 3, 2024. The submission package included the draft MIPA, a summary of the transaction terms, and a description of the due diligence process undertaken by Buyer and its advisors.
An underwriting diligence call was held with David Kowalski (Kelvantis Fidelity) and representatives of the following parties:
• Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP (Graham Ashworth and Danielle Ferreira) — Buyer's counsel;
• Drummond Zanthor Partners LLC (Philip Arnaud, Managing Director) — Buyer's financial advisor; and
• Whitecliff & Harding LLP (Susan Cartwright, engagement partner) — Buyer's quality of earnings advisor.
During the underwriting diligence call, the participants reviewed the transaction structure, the carve-out mechanics, the key risk areas identified in due diligence, the financial profile of MPH, and the scope of the Seller Disclosure Schedules. Particular attention was given to the carve-out separation risks, the environmental conditions at the owned distribution centers, the transfer pricing arrangements between MPH and other Aurelius entities, and the tax implications of the Section 338(h)(10) election.
Kelvantis Fidelity reviewed the following materials as part of its underwriting process:
• The draft MIPA (near-final form);
• The Seller Disclosure Schedules (initial draft, subsequently updated);
• The carve-out audited financial statements of MPH for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 and the stub period ended March 31, 2024, prepared by Pemberton Graves LLP;
• The quality of earnings report prepared by Whitecliff & Harding LLP;
• Legal due diligence memoranda prepared by Hathaway, Locke & Barnett LLP;
• Environmental due diligence reports, including Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments; and
• intellectual property due diligence reports.
Following the completion of the underwriting review, Kelvantis Fidelity issued a non-binding indication of terms on July 15, 2024, followed by a formal quote on July 18, 2024. The binder was issued on July 22, 2024, three business days after the signing of the MIPA. The formal policy is expected to be issued within 30 days of binding, and the policy wording will be in the form of the binder with such modifications as may be agreed by the parties during the policy drafting process. Seller's counsel (Calderwood & Harkness LLP) has reserved the right to review the final policy wording to confirm consistency with the binder terms and to verify the scope of the exclusions and the subrogation waiver.
IX. Key Dates Summary
The following table sets forth the key dates relevant to the RWI policy and the underlying transaction:
X. Observations and Recommendations
Based on our review of the RWI binder and the related transaction documents, we offer the following observations and recommendations:
1. The RWI policy is structured in a manner consistent with current market practice for buyer-side policies in middle-market carve-out transactions. The key economic terms — including the coverage limit, retention, premium rate, and policy period — are within the range of terms observed in comparable transactions and reflect a reasonable allocation of risk between the parties and the insurer.
2. The alignment of the coverage limit ($72,000,000) with both the indemnification cap under the MIPA and the escrow amount deposited with Granite Trust Company, N.A. provides a symmetrical risk allocation framework. This alignment simplifies the administration of claims and ensures that the Named Insured's total recovery potential (combining the escrow and the RWI policy) is calibrated to the indemnification exposure established in the MIPA.
3. The retention of $4,800,000, matching the MIPA's tipping basket, ensures that the insurer's exposure commences at the same economic threshold as Seller's indemnification obligation. This alignment is beneficial from both a structural and practical perspective, as it avoids any gap between the MIPA indemnification threshold and the RWI coverage trigger.
4. The 50/50 premium split ($900,000 per party) is within market norms and is favorable to Buyer relative to the growing trend of Buyer-borne premiums. In many recent transactions, particularly those involving financial sponsor buyers, the Buyer has borne 100% of the premium cost, making the 50/50 allocation a positive outcome for Pinnacle Ridge.
5. The subrogation waiver in favor of Seller is an important protection for Aurelius Media Holdings Inc. and Aurelius Global Media Group PLC. The waiver ensures that Seller will not face claims from the insurer following the payment of a covered loss, subject to the fraud and willful misconduct carve-out. Seller's counsel (Calderwood & Harkness LLP) should confirm that the subrogation waiver is reflected in the final policy wording in a manner consistent with the binder terms and should verify that the scope of the protected parties (including directors, officers, employees, and agents of Seller and its parent) is sufficiently broad.
6. Seller's counsel should review the final issued policy when it becomes available (expected within 30 days of binding) to confirm consistency with the binder terms summarized in this memorandum. Particular attention should be paid to the following areas:
(a) The exclusion for carve-out/separation risks (Section IV.B.1), to confirm that the scope of the exclusion is appropriately limited and does not inadvertently capture losses arising from breaches of representations and warranties that relate to MPH's standalone operations (as distinct from the separation process itself);
(b) The exclusion for Section 338(h)(10) election-related tax matters (Section IV.B.4), to confirm that the exclusion is narrowly drawn and does not preclude recovery for breaches of Seller's pre-closing tax representations;
(c) The subrogation waiver provisions, to confirm that the waiver is unconditional (except for the fraud/willful misconduct carve-out) and extends to all protected parties identified in the binder; and
(d) The definition of "Loss" and the treatment of consequential, incidental, and punitive damages, to confirm that the final policy wording is consistent with the binder terms and the MIPA's indemnification provisions.
7. The policy's 36-month term provides tail coverage beyond the general representation survival period (which expires 18 months post-closing on May 15, 2026), which is beneficial for Buyer's protection on Fundamental Representation claims. The extended reporting period of 12 months following policy expiration provides additional protection for claims discovered near the end of the policy period.
8. No further action is required by Seller at this time with respect to the RWI policy. The bring-down no-claims declaration and the formal policy issuance are the next key milestones, both of which are expected to occur at or around the Closing Date.
XI. Attachments / Cross-References
The following documents are attached to or cross-referenced in this memorandum and should be maintained in the matter file:
Attachment A: Copy of R&W Insurance Binder (Policy No. RWI-2024-MPH-00417) issued by Kelvantis Omnivrel Insurance Company on July 22, 2024 — to be maintained in the matter file (Matter No. 1043-00002).
Cross-Reference: Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (Execution Version, dated July 19, 2024) — Article IX (Indemnification), together with the Seller Disclosure Schedules.
Cross-Reference: Escrow Agreement (to be effective November 15, 2024) — among Seller, Buyer, and Granite Trust Company, N.A. as escrow agent, account reference GT-ESC-2024-11150048.
Cross-Reference: Indemnification and Escrow Terms Memorandum (M. Chu to B. Holloway and J. Prentice, dated June 20, 2024), which provides a detailed analysis of the negotiation and structuring of the indemnification provisions in the MIPA and the related escrow arrangement.
This memorandum is prepared for the internal files of Calderwood & Harkness LLP and for the benefit of our client, Aurelius Media Holdings Inc. The analysis set forth herein is based on our review of the RWI binder and related transaction documents as of the date hereof and is subject to update upon receipt of the formal policy wording.
Prepared by:
________________________________________
Megan Chu Lead Associate, Mergers & Acquisitions Calderwood & Harkness LLP 425 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022
Reviewed by:
________________________________________
Beatrice Holloway Responsible Partner, Mergers & Acquisitions Calderwood & Harkness LLP
Item | Date
MIPA Signing | July 19, 2024
R&W Policy Bound | July 22, 2024
Premium Payment Due | Upon binding (July 22, 2024)
Closing Date / Policy Inception | November 15, 2024
Bring-Down No-Claims Declaration | November 15, 2024 (at Closing)
Net Working Capital True-Up Deadline | February 13, 2025 (90 days post-closing)
General Representation Survival Expiry | May 15, 2026 (18 months post-closing)
Policy Expiry / Fundamental Representation Survival Expiry | November 15, 2027 (36 months post-closing)
Extended Reporting Period Expiry | November 15, 2028 (12 months after policy expiry)

MEMORANDUM

Record

Parties

Dates

Amounts