FR EA
1021-00003 · Verimark Hospitality Group · Mediation & Settlement
mediation-damages-summary-exhibits.pptx DOCUMENT Antitrust
44 / 75 ← → ✕
Contract analysis Extract to table

[slide 1]

Cover Slide

Verimark Hospitality Group Inc. v. Ironclad Indemnity Corp. et al.

Case No. 2022-CA-031547 — Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County

Mediation Before Hon. Richard Mendelson (Ret.) — Keystone Dispute Resolution Inc.

December 4–5, 2023

CONFIDENTIAL — PREPARED FOR MEDIATION PURPOSES ONLY

Prepared by Calderwood & Harkness LLP, Counsel for Verimark Hospitality Group Inc.

[slide 2]

Executive Summary

Verimark Hospitality Group Inc. (Nasdaq: VMRK) — publicly traded hospitality and real-estate company headquartered in Miami, FL

FY 2021 Revenue: $412M

Hurricane Callista (Category 4) made landfall September 18, 2022 — catastrophic damage to three flagship Florida resort properties

Total business-interruption losses: $60,000,000 across three properties

All four insurers denied or reserved rights on approximately $60M in BI coverage

VHG seeks recovery of its full policy tower: $60M in aggregate limits above $500K deductible

[slide 3]

The Insured Properties — Overview

Verimark Grand Key Resort — Mile Marker 48, Marathon, FL 33050: 312 rooms, luxury resort and marina; Pre-loss ADR $389, Occupancy 82%

Verimark Harborview Hotel & Conference Center — 1400 Estero Boulevard, Fort Myers Beach, FL 33931: 224 rooms + 40,000 sq. ft. conference facility; Pre-loss ADR $295, Occupancy 74%

Verimark Sunset Shores — 7200 Gulf Boulevard, St. Pete Beach, FL 33706: 186 rooms, boutique resort; Pre-loss ADR $342, Occupancy 79%

Combined: 722 rooms across three premier Florida resort destinations

[slide 4]

Hurricane Callista — Timeline of Events

September 12, 2022 — Hurricane Callista named by the National Hurricane Center

September 16, 2022 — Monroe County mandatory evacuation order issued (Grand Key Resort)

September 17, 2022 — Lee County evacuation order issued (Harborview)

September 18, 2022, ~1:30 PM EDT — Callista makes landfall as Category 4 (sustained winds 145 mph) near Big Pine Key, Lower Florida Keys

Storm surge: 8–14 feet in Monroe County; 6–10 feet in Lee County

All three VHG properties closed as of September 18, 2022

September 22, 2022 — VHG submits initial notice of loss to Ironclad Indemnity Corporation

[slide 5]

Property Damage — Grand Key Resort

312-room luxury resort and marina — Mile Marker 48, Marathon, FL

Catastrophic wind damage to structures; significant storm surge flooding (8–14 ft in Monroe County)

Complete closure: September 18, 2022 – March 15, 2023 (178 days)

Extensive structural repairs required; marina facilities destroyed

[PHOTOGRAPH PLACEHOLDER — Property damage images]

Forensic engineering analysis by Jeffrey Caldwell, PE (Caldwell Engineering Associates Inc.) confirms predominant wind causation

[slide 6]

Property Damage — Harborview Hotel & Conference Center

224-room hotel with 40,000 sq. ft. conference facility — Fort Myers Beach, FL

Severe wind damage to hotel structure and conference center; storm surge 6–10 ft in Lee County

Complete closure: September 18, 2022 – January 31, 2023 (135 days)

Conference center revenue loss significant — group bookings displaced for entire Q4 2022 and January 2023

[PHOTOGRAPH PLACEHOLDER — Property damage images]

[slide 7]

Property Damage — Sunset Shores

186-room boutique resort — St. Pete Beach, FL

Moderate-to-severe wind damage; partial structural compromise

Full closure: September 18 – November 30, 2022 (73 days)

Reduced capacity operations: December 2022 – February 2023

Full capacity restored: February 28, 2023

[PHOTOGRAPH PLACEHOLDER — Property damage images]

[slide 8]

Business-Interruption Loss Quantification — Summary

Total Claimed Business-Interruption Loss: $60,000,000

Grand Key Resort: $31,400,000 (178-day closure)

Harborview Hotel & Conference Center: $18,700,000 (135-day closure)

Sunset Shores: $9,900,000 (73-day full closure + partial closure period)

Expert analysis by Dr. Helen Vasquez, CPA, CFF — Meridian Forensic Economics LLC

Methodology: Historical financial performance, ADR, occupancy rates, ancillary revenue, conference revenue, saved expenses analysis

[slide 9]

Grand Key Resort — BI Loss Detail ($31.4M)

312 rooms × $389 ADR × 82% occupancy × 178 closure days = room revenue baseline

Ancillary revenue: marina operations, food & beverage, spa, water sports

Adjustments for seasonality (peak winter season captured in closure period)

Less: Saved variable expenses during closure

Total BI Loss: $31,400,000

[CHART PLACEHOLDER — Monthly revenue comparison: actual vs. projected]

[slide 10]

Harborview Hotel & Conference Center — BI Loss Detail ($18.7M)

224 rooms × $295 ADR × 74% occupancy × 135 closure days = room revenue baseline

Conference center: 40,000 sq. ft. — lost group bookings and event revenue for Q4 2022 and January 2023

Food & beverage and event catering revenue losses

Less: Saved variable expenses during closure

Total BI Loss: $18,700,000

[CHART PLACEHOLDER — Conference center booking comparison: actual vs. projected]

[slide 11]

Sunset Shores — BI Loss Detail ($9.9M)

186 rooms × $342 ADR × 79% occupancy × 73 full-closure days

Plus: Reduced capacity operations December 2022 – February 2023 (partial revenue loss)

Full capacity not restored until February 28, 2023

Less: Saved variable expenses; partial revenue earned during reduced operations

Total BI Loss: $9,900,000

[CHART PLACEHOLDER — Occupancy and revenue during reduced-capacity period]

[slide 12]

Insurance Tower Structure — $60M in Total Limits

Primary Layer: Ironclad Indemnity Corporation — $25M limit (Policy IIC-PRP-2022-07541), $500K deductible

1st Excess: Pinnacle Surplus Lines Inc. — $15M xs $25M (Policy PSL-XS1-2022-3390)

2nd Excess: Montclair Assurance Company — $10M xs $40M (Policy MAC-XS2-2022-09817)

3rd Excess: Sovereign Re Ltd. — $10M xs $50M (Policy SRL-XS3-2022-5102)

Total Tower: $60,000,000 above $500,000 deductible

All policies: July 1, 2022 – July 1, 2023

[CHART PLACEHOLDER — Tower diagram showing layers]

[slide 13]

The Insurers' Denial Positions

1. Windstorm Sub-Limit: Ironclad asserts a $15M named-windstorm sub-limit applies — VHG contends this was deleted at the July 2022 renewal per broker negotiations

2. Period of Restoration: Ironclad argues VHG unreasonably delayed restoration — VHG demonstrates closures were the minimum necessary for repairs

3. Concurrent Causation / Flood Exclusion: Ironclad claims storm-surge damage at Grand Key triggers the flood exclusion — VHG invokes Florida's efficient proximate cause doctrine (wind was the predominant cause)

4. Failure to Mitigate: Ironclad alleges VHG failed to take reasonable steps to reduce the interruption period — evidence demonstrates comprehensive mitigation efforts

[slide 14]

Windstorm Sub-Limit — VHG's Strongest Argument

Ironclad's position: Policy contains a $15M named-windstorm sub-limit for BI

VHG's position: Sub-limit was expressly deleted during July 2022 renewal negotiations

Key evidence: Broker correspondence from Franklin Orde (Tidewater Risk Advisors) confirming Ironclad's underwriter agreed to delete the sub-limit in exchange for increased premium

Deposition testimony of Franklin Orde (August 28, 2023): Confirmed deletion negotiations and Ironclad's agreement

Deposition testimony of Victor Haddon (July 10, 2023): Could not identify any underwriting documentation supporting retention of the sub-limit

VHG's motion for partial summary judgment filed November 1, 2023 — pending before Hon. Catherine Embry

Under Florida law, ambiguities in policy endorsements are construed against the insurer

[slide 15]

Concurrent Causation / Flood Exclusion — Florida Law Favors VHG

Ironclad argues storm surge at Grand Key Resort constitutes 'flood' — excluded peril

Florida's efficient proximate cause doctrine: When wind (covered) and flood (excluded) concurrently cause damage, coverage applies if wind is the efficient proximate cause

Forensic engineering analysis by Jeffrey Caldwell, PE (Caldwell Engineering Associates): Wind was the predominant cause of structural damage at Grand Key

Storm surge contributed to secondary damage but wind caused the structural failure

Anti-concurrent causation clause in the policy is unenforceable under Florida law as applied to these facts

[slide 16]

Period of Restoration — Closures Were Reasonable

Grand Key Resort: 178 days (closed Sept 18, 2022 – Mar 15, 2023) — extensive structural repairs, marina reconstruction

Harborview: 135 days (closed Sept 18, 2022 – Jan 31, 2023) — hotel and conference center repairs

Sunset Shores: 73 days full closure (Sept 18 – Nov 30, 2022); reduced capacity through Feb 28, 2023

Restoration timelines supported by contractor records and Dr. Vasquez's analysis

Defense expert Dr. Warren Birk (Graystone Consulting Group) could not identify specific unreasonable delays in deposition (October 23, 2023)

Post-hurricane contractor shortages and supply-chain disruptions in South Florida are well-documented

[slide 17]

Failure to Mitigate — VHG Took Comprehensive Steps

Immediate property securing and emergency stabilization post-storm

Engaged contractors for structural assessment and repair planning within days of access

Sunset Shores partially reopened November 30, 2022 — earliest feasible date

VHG redirected guests to non-affected properties where possible

Sandra Pellegrini coordinated mitigation efforts with Tidewater Risk Advisors and contractors

No credible evidence of failure to mitigate — defense has not identified specific deficiencies

[slide 18]

Key Deposition Testimony — Favorable Admissions

Victor Haddon (Ironclad SVP Claims, July 10): Could not locate underwriting file documentation supporting retention of windstorm sub-limit; acknowledged denial relied heavily on Arbor Claims' adjustment

Denise Whitford (Arbor Claims, July 24): Confirmed extensive property damage at all three locations; acknowledged she did not opine on the windstorm sub-limit issue

Franklin Orde (Tidewater, August 28): Testified that Ironclad's underwriter agreed to delete the windstorm sub-limit in exchange for a premium increase at the July 2022 renewal

Dr. Warren Birk (Graystone, October 23): Conceded he could not identify specific unreasonable delays in VHG's restoration timeline; his reduced BI estimate relied on the disputed windstorm sub-limit

[slide 19]

Expert Evidence — Dr. Helen Vasquez (Meridian Forensic Economics)

Dr. Helen Vasquez, CPA, CFF — retained by Calderwood & Harkness LLP

Expert report served September 15, 2023; deposed October 16, 2023

Methodology: Detailed property-level analysis of lost revenue using historical ADR, occupancy, ancillary revenue, and seasonal adjustments

Conclusion: VHG's total BI losses exceed $60M

Withstood defense cross-examination — methodology consistent with industry standards

Defense expert Dr. Birk's lower estimate ($37–42M range) relies on disputed windstorm sub-limit cap and shorter restoration period

[slide 20]

Pending Summary Judgment Motions

November 1, 2023: VHG filed motion for partial summary judgment on the windstorm sub-limit issue

Supported by declarations of Sandra Pellegrini, Franklin Orde, and Dr. Helen Vasquez

November 15, 2023: Defendants filed cross-motion for partial summary judgment

November 20, 2023: Hon. Catherine Embry ordered mediation before ruling on the motions

VHG is confident in prevailing on the sub-limit issue, which would expose the full $60M tower

A favorable ruling on the sub-limit issue would significantly increase trial exposure for all carriers

[slide 21]

Litigation Timeline — Key Milestones

Sept 22, 2022 — Notice of loss submitted

Oct 12, 2022 — Ironclad reservation of rights

Nov 15, 2022 — Sworn proof of loss ($60M)

Feb 3, 2023 — Ironclad formal denial; Feb 10 — Pinnacle follows

Mar 1, 2023 — Complaint filed (Case No. 2022-CA-031547)

Jun–Sept 2023 — Fact discovery (6 depositions completed)

Sept–Oct 2023 — Expert reports served; expert depositions

Nov 1, 2023 — VHG partial summary judgment motion filed

Dec 4–5, 2023 — Mediation

[CHART PLACEHOLDER — Visual timeline graphic]

[slide 22]

Claims Administration History

VHG provided prompt notice of loss (September 22, 2022 — 4 days after landfall)

Arbor Claims Services LLC (Denise Whitford) inspected properties October 5, 2022

VHG submitted sworn statement in proof of loss November 15, 2022 ($60M)

Ironclad delayed — reservation of rights issued October 12, 2022; formal denial not until February 3, 2023 (over 4 months after notice)

Pinnacle followed Ironclad's denial February 10, 2023

Montclair and Sovereign Re reserved rights but never formally denied

VHG fully cooperated throughout the claims process

[slide 23]

Settlement Demand and Exposure Analysis

VHG's total claim: $60,000,000 — full policy tower

Strong likelihood of prevailing on windstorm sub-limit issue — exposes full tower

Remaining defenses (concurrent causation, period of restoration, mitigation) are individually weak

Bad-faith exposure under Florida law adds potential extra-contractual damages for Ironclad

Litigation costs and uncertainty for all carriers if case proceeds to trial

VHG seeks a resolution that reflects the strength of its position and the full value of its losses

[slide 24]

Carrier-by-Carrier Exposure

Ironclad Indemnity Corp. (Primary): $25M limit less $500K deductible = $24.5M exposure + bad-faith risk

Pinnacle Surplus Lines Inc. (1st Excess): $15M follow-form — follows Ironclad on coverage; full layer at risk if sub-limit issue resolved in VHG's favor

Montclair Assurance Co. (2nd Excess): $10M layer attaches at $40M — exposed if losses exceed $40M (Dr. Vasquez confirms they do)

Sovereign Re Ltd. (3rd Excess): $10M layer attaches at $50M — exposed if losses exceed $50M (Dr. Vasquez confirms $60M+ in losses)

Defense counsel: Fendowell Rourke & Stanton LLP (Ironclad/Pinnacle); Delvecchio & Kraus LLP (Montclair/Sovereign Re)

[slide 25]

Conclusion — VHG Seeks Full and Fair Recovery

VHG's $60M business-interruption claim is well-documented and supported by expert analysis

The windstorm sub-limit was deleted at the 2022 renewal — the full tower is at risk

All four insurer defenses are factually and legally weak under Florida law

VHG acted in good faith throughout — prompt notice, full cooperation, reasonable mitigation

VHG is prepared to proceed to trial if a fair resolution cannot be reached

VHG respectfully requests the mediator's assistance in achieving a just result