FR EA
1025-00007 · Quorum Insurance Holdings · Correspondence
email-response-to-cb-indenture-comments.eml EMAIL M&A / Corporate
12 / 83 ← → ✕
Contract analysis Extract to table
DeYuki Nakamura <ynakamura@calderwoodharkness.com>
ÀHarrison Collier <hcollier@callowaybrandt.com>
CcDouglas Carmichael <dcarmichael@calderwoodharkness.com>
DateMon, 26 Sep 2022 04:47:00 -0000
ObjetRe: QRF 2022-1 — Issuer's Counsel Comments on C&B Indenture Markup [C&H Matter No. 1025-00007]

Harrison and Megan,

Thank you for the thorough and detailed markup of the Indenture that you circulated on September 20. We appreciate the care and thought reflected in your comments, and we have reviewed them in full with our client, Quorum Insurance Holdings Corp. I should also note that Julian Weatherstone and Rebecca Tran on Ridgeline's deal team had separate commercial discussions with Nolan and the QIH team on several of the points you raised, and our responses below reflect those conversations as well.

Attached please find:

1. A redline of the Indenture (v2) reflecting Calderwood & Harkness's proposed revisions in response to your September 20 markup; 2. A clean copy of the Indenture (v2); and 3. A brief comparison chart / issues list summarizing each party's position on the open points, which I hope will be a useful reference as we work toward convergence.

This email addresses the principal substantive issues. We have accepted your minor conforming and typographical edits without comment. I'll take the key topics in turn.

**1. Events of Default Provisions**

*Cross-default to QIH credit facilities.* Accepted. We have incorporated your proposed cross-default provision, subject to a materiality threshold — specifically, the cross-default is triggered only if the defaulted amount under QIH's unsecured credit facilities exceeds $25 million. We believe this is a reasonable floor that avoids tripping an Event of Default based on immaterial or technical defaults under unrelated facilities.

*Breach of representations/warranties in the NPA.* Accepted in principle, with modifications. We agree that a material breach of representations or warranties in the Note Purchase Agreement should constitute an Event of Default under the Indenture. However, we have proposed two qualifications: (i) a 30-day cure period for breaches of non-financial representations, giving the Issuer a reasonable opportunity to remedy before acceleration rights arise; and (ii) a materiality qualifier, such that the breach must be "material and adverse to the interests of the noteholders." We believe both are customary and appropriate for a transaction of this nature.

*Automatic acceleration.* We are not in a position to accept this comment at this time. Our strong preference — and, we believe, the standard approach in ABS indenture practice — is that acceleration upon an Event of Default should require direction from holders of a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the Class A Notes rather than occurring automatically. This is consistent with the expectations communicated by both Brindoval Ratings and Pinnacle Rating Services in their preliminary feedback, and we are concerned that an automatic acceleration mechanism could trigger adverse rating consequences. We are happy to discuss this further, but we would ask that C&B consider the rating agency dimension before pressing this point.

**2. Early Amortization Triggers**

*3-month average net loss rate (2.00%).* Accepted. Your proposed language tightening this trigger is consistent with the Final Term Sheet (v3, dated September 2) and with rating agency criteria. No changes from our side.

*60+ day delinquency rate (3.50%).* Accepted. This is unchanged from the first draft and aligns with the Brindoval and Pinnacle preliminary rating conditions.

*Servicer credit rating downgrade trigger.* Accepted in principle. We agree that an early amortization trigger linked to a downgrade of the servicer's credit rating is appropriate. However, because Quorum Premium Finance LLC itself is unrated, the trigger should reference the ratings of the servicer parent, Quorum Insurance Holdings Corp. — i.e., a downgrade of QIH's unsecured rating below BB(cr) (Brindoval) or Ba2(p) (Pinnacle). We have proposed conforming language in the redline to make this clear.

*Minimum pool balance ($450,000,000).* Accepted. This is consistent with the term sheet.

*Available funds cap deficit trigger — new C&H comment.* We have proposed adding a 5-business-day grace period for the available funds cap deficit trigger (which currently requires two consecutive measurement periods in deficit). The grace period is intended to accommodate administrative and settlement timing issues that could otherwise produce a technical trigger event that does not reflect an actual deterioration in pool performance. We flag that this addition is subject to confirmation from Brindoval and Pinnacle that it does not affect their preliminary rating conclusions, and we intend to raise it in the Q&A session scheduled for September 28.

**3. Indemnification Provisions in the Note Purchase Agreement**

We note that your September 20 comments also addressed indemnification provisions in the Note Purchase Agreement. Since that is technically a separate document, we will provide a full markup of the NPA with our responses later this week. By way of brief preview, however: standard issuer/sponsor indemnification of the initial purchaser (Ridgeline Capital Markets) is acceptable to Quorum, but we will resist (i) uncapped indemnification and (ii) indemnification for losses arising from the initial purchaser's own negligence or willful misconduct. As context, total placement fees across all tranches are $1,672,500 (0.30% on the $375M Class A, 0.45% on the $75M Class B, and 0.60% on the $35M Class C), and we believe indemnification obligations should be proportionate to those economics. More to follow.

**4. Payment Waterfall**

*Trustee fees at the top of the waterfall.* Accepted. Your proposed clarification that trustee fees and expenses (Calvoneth Trust Company, N.A. — $35,000/year plus $5,000 per payment date) sit at the top of the waterfall, senior to servicing fees, is consistent with our original intent and the structural diagram. We have conformed the language accordingly.

*Sequential priority.* Accepted. The waterfall now clearly states the sequential priority as follows: (1) Trustee fees and expenses; (2) Servicing fee (1.00% per annum on the outstanding pool balance); (3) Class A interest; (4) Class B interest; (5) Class C interest; (6) Class A principal; (7) Class B principal; (8) Class C principal; (9) OC replenishment to target ($15M); and (10) Residual to Issuer.

*Back-up servicer fees.* We have not accepted your suggestion to add back-up servicer fees (Northvane Bank — $50,000/year) as a separate senior waterfall item ahead of Class A interest. Our position is that back-up servicer fees should be paid as an operating expense of the Issuer outside the waterfall, which is consistent with the approach taken in the current draft of the Back-Up Servicing Agreement. Elevating these fees to a senior waterfall position would reduce funds available to noteholders in a stress scenario without, in our view, a corresponding structural benefit. That said, we recognize this is a point on which reasonable minds may differ, and we are happy to discuss it further.

**5. Liquidity Facility Mechanics**

You raised a question about the interaction between the $25,000,000 liquidity facility provided by Northvane Bank and the payment waterfall. We confirm that draws on the liquidity facility are intended solely to cover temporary timing mismatches in collections, and that repayment of liquidity draws sits pari passu with trustee fees at the top of the waterfall. We have proposed specific indenture language to this effect in the redline. For reference, the commitment fee is 0.25% per annum on undrawn amounts and the drawn rate is SOFR + 150 bps, each as set forth in the Liquidity Facility Agreement and cross-referenced in the Indenture.

**6. Credit Enhancement / Overcollateralization**

We confirm the total credit enhancement levels as agreed: 25.0% for Class A (comprising 15.0% subordination from Class B, 7.0% subordination from Class C, and 3.0% overcollateralization), 10.0% for Class B, and 3.0% for Class C. Your request for express language requiring the OC target to be maintained at $15,000,000 throughout the revolving period, with replenishment from excess spread before any residual distributions to the Issuer, has been incorporated.

**7. Representations Regarding the Receivables Pool**

*State licensing and usury compliance.* Accepted. Your request to expand the Issuer's representations to include compliance with all state premium finance licensing requirements and applicable usury laws is consistent with the eligible receivables criteria (which require that each receivable be compliant with all applicable usury and licensing laws) and with the analysis set forth in our state licensing memorandum. We have added the requested representations.

*Weighted average APR cap.* We respectfully push back on this one. The current weighted average APR of the pool is 7.85%, but this rate will naturally fluctuate during the revolving period as receivables are added and removed, and imposing a fixed aggregate WA APR covenant could inadvertently constrain the Issuer's ability to replenish the pool with otherwise eligible receivables. Our proposed alternative is that each individual receivable added to the pool must comply with the applicable state rate cap, without an additional aggregate WA APR covenant layered on top. We believe this provides the substantive protection C&B is seeking while avoiding unnecessary operational complexity.

**8. Trustee Protections**

Ashfield & Greer LLP (Vivian Sato), counsel to Calvoneth Trust, has separately provided comments on the trustee protective provisions. We have reviewed those and incorporated standard trustee exculpation and indemnification language. A few points remain open — principally around the scope of the trustee's duties in an enforcement scenario — and we expect to resolve those in a three-way call with Vivian and her team later this week.

**9. Concentration Limits**

We confirm that the following concentration limits are reflected in the eligible receivables criteria and revolving-period replenishment standards, consistent with the term sheet and rating agency requirements:

- Single obligor: ≤ 0.75% of pool balance - Single state: ≤ 20% of pool balance - Single carrier: ≤ 15% of pool balance

For reference, the current pool metrics are well within these limits: largest single obligor at 0.38% ($2,325,600), top 10 obligors at 2.14% ($13,096,800), and top state (Texas) at 14.2%.

**10. Next Steps**

We would appreciate receiving C&B's response to the revised redline by end of day Friday, September 30. As you know, the second-round rating agency Q&A session with Brindoval and Pinnacle is scheduled for Wednesday, September 28, and it would be highly beneficial for any structural changes agreed between counsel to be settled before that session so that we can present a consistent position to both agencies.

On our side, we will circulate separate markups responding to your comments on the Note Purchase Agreement and the Servicing Agreement later this week.

Our target remains a near-final documentation package by mid-October. We believe we are well-positioned to meet that timeline if we can close the remaining open items over the next two weeks.

Finally, if it would be helpful, we are happy to set up a call with you, Megan, Douglas, and Nolan to work through any remaining open items in real time. Please let us know your availability and we will coordinate.

Thank you again for the careful and constructive comments. We look forward to your response.

Best regards,

Yuki Nakamura Senior Associate Calderwood & Harkness LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 T: (212) 555-0184 E: ynakamura@calderwoodharkness.com

---

*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other applicable privileges. This communication is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this communication or any of its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and permanently delete all copies of this message and any attachments.*