FR EA
1025-00008 · Quorum Insurance Holdings · Transaction Documents/MDLA
issues-list-open-points-tracker-v1.xlsx DOCUMENT M&A / Corporate
63 / 76 ← → ✕
Contract analysis Extract to table

[sheet: Open Points Tracker]

Item No.MDLA Article/SectionIssue DescriptionQuorum PositionMeridian PositionStatusPriorityRisk LevelAssigned C&H Team MemberQuorum Business ContactKP&A CounterpartDate First RaisedLast UpdatedNotes / Next Steps
1Article I — DefinitionsDefinition of 'Derived Data'Quorum proposes broad definition: all data, models, scores, indices, and analytics outputs created by Quorum using licensed Meridian data as an input, including QuorumScore™ outputs. Quorum insists Derived Data is distinct from 'derivative works' under copyright law.Meridian defines Derived Data narrowly as any data that 'incorporates, is based on, or is traceable to' Meridian raw data, treating it as a derivative work subject to Meridian's underlying IP rights. Meridian asserts sole discretion over classification.OpenCriticalRedWendy SchultzRajesh AnandNina Chastain2022-11-042023-01-15Foundational to Article VII resolution. C&H delivered proposed alternative definition in Dec. 2 redline. Awaiting Meridian response. See C&H memo on ML model outputs (Jan. 2023).
2Article I — DefinitionsDefinition of 'Licensed Data'Quorum requests explicit enumeration of all three Meridian data products: MCI Consumer Credit File (~310M consumer records), MCI CommercialView (~42M business records), MCI AltSignal (~85M consumer alt-data records). Total ~437M records/month.Meridian prefers generic reference to 'data products identified in Schedule A' without record-count commitments in the definition itself.Partially AgreedMediumYellowOmar SiddiquiPriya NairDerek Fontaine2022-11-042023-01-15Agreement in principle to enumerate products; record-count commitment language deferred to Technical Schedule A.
3Article I — DefinitionsDefinition of 'Comparable Licensee' (for MFN clause)Quorum defines as all U.S.-domiciled insurance carriers, managing general agents, and insurtech firms with annual premiums written ≥ $500 million.Meridian rejects inclusion of any MFN-related definition; contends MFN clause is not acceptable in any form.OpenCriticalRedWendy SchultzThomas NgGraham Whitley2022-12-022023-01-15Tied to Article IV MFN provision. Meridian categorically refuses MFN. First in-person session Jan. 18 will address.
4Article II — Grant of LicenseScope of license grant — permitted usesQuorum seeks broad license to use Licensed Data for automated underwriting models, claims-fraud detection algorithms, customer propensity scoring across all P&C, life, and specialty lines, and creation of Derived Data for internal and external commercial use.Meridian limits permitted use to Quorum's internal insurance underwriting and claims operations only; no external commercialization of any outputs incorporating Licensed Data.OpenCriticalRedWendy SchultzDiane LowellNina Chastain2022-11-042023-01-15Directly linked to Article VII Derived Data rights. Quorum's QuorumScore™ B2B licensing strategy ($40–50M projected revenue by 2027) depends on broad scope.
5Article II — Grant of LicenseSublicensing rightsQuorum requests right to sublicense Derived Data (not raw Licensed Data) to third parties without Meridian consent.Meridian prohibits any sublicensing of Licensed Data or any data traceable to Licensed Data without prior written consent, which may be withheld in Meridian's sole discretion.OpenCriticalRedWendy SchultzRajesh AnandNina Chastain2022-12-022023-01-15Key commercial issue. Quorum needs sublicensing for QuorumScore™ B2B model. Linked to Article VII.
6Article II — Grant of LicenseLicense term — 5-year initial termQuorum accepts 5-year initial term.Meridian accepts 5-year initial term.AgreedLowGreenOmar SiddiquiThomas NgDerek Fontaine2022-09-122022-12-02Agreed at term sheet stage. No further negotiation needed.
7Article II — Grant of LicenseRenewal terms / optionsQuorum seeks automatic renewal for successive 2-year terms at pricing not to exceed a 5% annual escalation cap.Meridian proposes renewal only by mutual written agreement with pricing to be renegotiated at fair market value.OpenHighYellowPatricia HengThomas NgGraham Whitley2022-11-042023-01-15Linked to pricing discussion. Quorum concerned about lock-in at renegotiated rates.
8Article III — Data Products & DeliveryData products included in licenseAll three products: MCI Consumer Credit File, MCI CommercialView, MCI AltSignal.Meridian agrees all three products are in scope.AgreedMediumGreenOmar SiddiquiPriya NairDerek Fontaine2022-09-122022-12-02Agreed. Detailed specifications to be set forth in Technical Schedule A.
9Article III — Data Products & DeliveryRefresh frequencies and delivery methodsQuorum requires: MCI Consumer Credit File — daily batch (SFTP) + real-time API (REST); MCI CommercialView — weekly batch (SFTP); MCI AltSignal — daily batch (SFTP).Meridian generally agrees to stated frequencies and methods; some technical details on API rate limits and batch file specifications under discussion.Partially AgreedMediumYellowOmar SiddiquiPriya NairDerek Fontaine2022-11-042023-01-15Core frequencies agreed. API rate limits, batch naming conventions, and data-quality acceptance criteria still being negotiated for Technical Schedule A.
10Article III — Data Products & DeliveryBase-tier record volume cap and overage pricingQuorum accepts 500 million records/month base tier at $0.003/record overage above base tier. Current estimated monthly volume is ~437M records (87.4% of base tier).Meridian agrees to 500M records/month base tier and $0.003/record overage rate.AgreedMediumGreenOmar SiddiquiPriya NairDerek Fontaine2022-09-302022-12-02Agreed at counter-term sheet stage.
11Article IV — Fees & PaymentAnnual license fees — Year 1Quorum agrees to $10,800,000 for Year 1 ($900,000/month), reflecting 6-month implementation ramp. Quarterly installments of $2,700,000 payable in advance.Meridian agrees to Year 1 fee of $10,800,000.AgreedHighGreenPatricia HengThomas NgKeith Marlow2022-09-302022-12-02Agreed at term sheet stage.
12Article IV — Fees & PaymentAnnual license fees — Years 2–5Quorum agrees to $12,300,000/year for Years 2–5 ($1,025,000/month). Quarterly installments of $3,075,000 payable in advance. Total 5-year value: $60,000,000.Meridian agrees to Years 2–5 fee of $12,300,000/year.AgreedHighGreenPatricia HengThomas NgKeith Marlow2022-09-302022-12-02Agreed. Total deal value reconciles: $10.8M + ($12.3M × 4) = $60.0M.
13Article IV — Fees & PaymentOne-time implementation/integration feeQuorum agrees to $1,500,000 one-time fee, billed separately and outside the $60M license value.Meridian agrees to $1,500,000 implementation fee.AgreedMediumGreenOmar SiddiquiThomas NgJordan Prescott2022-09-302022-12-02Agreed. Payment timing (at signing vs. at go-live) still to be confirmed.
14Article IV — Fees & PaymentPayment terms — quarterly in advance; late payment interestQuorum agrees to quarterly-in-advance payments. Quorum proposes late payment interest at 1.0% per month (12% per annum).Meridian insists on 1.5% per month (18% per annum) for late payments.OpenLowYellowMarcus WeillThomas NgDerek Fontaine2022-12-022023-01-15Minor point. Meridian firm at 1.5%/month. Quorum may concede as part of broader package.
15Article IV — Fees & PaymentMost Favored Nation pricing clauseQuorum demands a most favored nation provision: if Meridian offers any other insurance-industry licensee (U.S.-domiciled carriers, MGAs, insurtechs with annual premiums ≥ $500M) more favorable per-record pricing, volume discounts, or fee terms, Quorum's pricing automatically adjusts to match.Meridian categorically refuses any MFN clause, citing: (a) confidentiality obligations to other licensees; (b) impracticability of cross-licensee price comparisons given bespoke packages; (c) Breckenridge Capital Partners and Whitmore Zanthor concern that MFN will be viewed as margin risk in planned 2025–2026 IPO due diligence; (d) antitrust sensitivities in credit-data markets.OpenCriticalRedWendy Schultz / Patricia HengThomas Ng / Rajesh AnandGraham Whitley2022-09-302023-01-15PRIMARY IMPASSE ISSUE #1. Quorum has a fallback position (pricing audit right — not yet presented). Pinnacle Ridge Advisory pricing benchmark study expected Feb. 2023 to support Quorum's position. To be discussed at Jan. 18 session.
16Article V — Term & TerminationTermination for convenienceQuorum seeks right to terminate for convenience on 180 days' written notice after Year 2, with pro-rata refund of prepaid fees.Meridian opposes any termination for convenience by licensee; requires full payment through the end of the 5-year term regardless of early termination.OpenHighYellowPatricia HengThomas NgGraham Whitley2022-12-022023-01-15Quorum concerned about being locked into full $60M if data quality deteriorates or business needs change.
17Article V — Term & TerminationTermination for material breach — cure periodQuorum proposes 30-day cure period for material breach.Meridian proposes 60-day cure period.OpenMediumYellowMarcus WeillGregory StahlBen Overstreet2022-12-022023-01-15Negotiable. Likely to settle at 45 days.
18Article V — Term & TerminationPost-termination data return/destruction — Raw Licensed DataQuorum agrees to return or destroy all Meridian raw Licensed Data within 90 days of termination.Meridian agrees to 90-day return/destroy period for raw data.AgreedHighGreenLisa JohannsenPriya NairLena Vasquez2022-12-022022-12-02Agreed in principle. Certification of destruction mechanism to be detailed in DSA.
19Article V — Term & TerminationPost-termination treatment of Derived DataQuorum insists it retains all Derived Data in perpetuity post-termination, including right to continue commercializing Derived Data, since Quorum owns the IP.Meridian demands that all Derived Data traceable to Licensed Data must also be returned or destroyed within 90 days of termination, or alternatively that Quorum's commercialization rights in Derived Data terminate upon MDLA termination.OpenCriticalRedWendy SchultzRajesh AnandNina Chastain2022-12-022023-01-15Directly tied to Article VII Derived Data IP ownership resolution. Cannot be resolved independently.
20Article VI — Data Security & PrivacySecurity standards and certificationsQuorum requires Meridian to maintain SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. Quorum will maintain SOC 2 Type II.Meridian agrees to SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. Meridian's SOC 2 report issued by Galloway Nash LLP (period ending Mar. 31, 2023). Quorum's SOC 2 report issued by Felton Thorpe & Co. LLP (period ending Dec. 31, 2023).AgreedHighGreenDavid CartwrightClaudia ReevesLena Vasquez2022-11-042022-12-02Agreed. Annual re-certification requirement to be included.
21Article VI — Data Security & PrivacyData-breach notification timelineQuorum requires 48-hour notification from discovery of a data breach by either party.Meridian agrees to 48-hour notification obligation, applicable to both parties.AgreedHighGreenDavid CartwrightClaudia ReevesLena Vasquez2022-12-022022-12-02Agreed. Details of incident response procedures to be set forth in Data Security Addendum.
22Article VI — Data Security & PrivacyFCRA permissible purpose certificationQuorum will provide FCRA permissible purpose certification as a schedule to the MDLA, specifying insurance underwriting and account review as applicable categories.Meridian requires certification as a condition precedent to data access.Partially AgreedHighYellowLisa JohannsenClaudia ReevesLena Vasquez2022-11-042023-01-15Parties agree on concept; drafting of certification schedule in progress. Lisa Johannsen preparing draft.
23Article VI — Data Security & PrivacyCCPA/CPRA compliance — Data Processing AgreementQuorum proposes separate DPA to address CCPA/CPRA service-provider/contractor requirements, consumer opt-out rights, de-identification standards.Meridian agrees to negotiate a DPA but has not yet reviewed Quorum's proposed draft.OpenHighYellowLisa JohannsenClaudia ReevesLena Vasquez2022-12-022023-01-15C&H DPA draft in progress (Lisa Johannsen, target Mar. 2023). Linked to CCPA/CPRA memo.
24Article VI — Data Security & PrivacyNY DFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR 500) complianceQuorum requires contractual provisions ensuring Meridian's compliance with third-party service provider oversight requirements under 23 NYCRR 500.Meridian has not objected in principle but wants to review specific proposed language.OpenMediumYellowDavid CartwrightClaudia ReevesLena Vasquez2022-12-022023-01-15David Cartwright preparing memo on 23 NYCRR 500 requirements. Language to be included in DSA.
25Article VII — Intellectual Property & Derived DataOwnership of Derived Data IPQuorum shall own all intellectual property in Derived Data (data, models, scores, indices, analytics outputs created by Quorum using Licensed Data as input) with unrestricted rights to use, sublicense, and commercialize without additional fees or Meridian consent.Meridian insists Derived Data incorporating, based on, or traceable to Meridian raw data constitutes a 'derivative work' under copyright and remains subject to Meridian's underlying IP. Meridian demands control over commercialization.OpenCriticalRedWendy Schultz / Omar SiddiquiRajesh Anand / Diane LowellGraham Whitley / Nina Chastain2022-11-042023-01-15PRIMARY IMPASSE ISSUE #2. Central to Quorum's QuorumScore™ strategy. C&H delivered proposed Article VII in Dec. 2 redline. See C&H memos on derived-data IP ownership and ML model outputs.
26Article VII — Intellectual Property & Derived DataMeridian license-back on Derived DataQuorum categorically rejects any license-back to Meridian on Derived Data.Meridian demands a perpetual, royalty-free license-back on all Derived Data for Meridian's own use.OpenCriticalRedWendy SchultzRajesh AnandGraham Whitley2022-11-042023-01-15Non-starter for Quorum. Would give Meridian access to QuorumScore™ outputs and other proprietary models.
27Article VII — Intellectual Property & Derived Data'Sufficient transformation' standard for third-party commercializationQuorum rejects Meridian's proposal that Meridian have sole discretion to determine 'sufficient transformation.' Quorum proposes objective, jointly agreed criteria.Meridian demands sole discretion to determine whether Derived Data has been 'sufficiently transformed' such that no Meridian raw data can be reverse-engineered from it before Quorum may sell or sublicense to third parties.OpenCriticalRedWendy SchultzRajesh AnandGraham Whitley2022-11-042023-01-15Unworkably subjective per C&H analysis. C&H preparing critique memo (target May 2023). Quorum will propose objective alternative.
28Article VII — Intellectual Property & Derived DataRevenue-sharing on Derived Data commercializationQuorum rejects any revenue-sharing obligation to Meridian on Derived Data commercialization.Meridian demands 15% of net revenues attributable to Quorum's external commercialization of approved Derived Data.OpenCriticalRedWendy Schultz / Patricia HengThomas Ng / Rajesh AnandGraham Whitley / Keith Marlow2022-11-042023-01-15Would directly impact QuorumScore™ B2B licensing revenue ($40–50M projected by 2027). Non-starter per Quorum business team.
29Article VII — Intellectual Property & Derived DataML model outputs — classification as Derived DataQuorum argues that outputs of its ML models (e.g., live predictions using new non-Meridian inputs) are not 'derived data' even if the models were trained on Meridian data; only trained model weights/parameters may arguably be derivative.Meridian contends that any output of a model trained on Meridian data is Derived Data subject to Meridian's IP rights and commercialization restrictions.OpenCriticalRedWendy Schultz / Omar SiddiquiRajesh AnandNina Chastain2022-12-022023-01-15Technical and legal dispute. C&H preparing copyright & trade secret analysis memo (Jan. 2023). Key issue for QuorumScore™ protection.
30Article VII — Intellectual Property & Derived DataQuorumScore™ carve-outQuorum seeks explicit carve-out protecting QuorumScore™ (USPTO application Serial No. 97/482,116) from any Meridian IP claims, license-back, or revenue share.Meridian has not addressed QuorumScore™ specifically; general position would subject it to Derived Data restrictions.OpenCriticalRedWendy SchultzRajesh Anand / Diane LowellGraham Whitley2022-12-022023-01-15C&H preparing QuorumScore™ IP protection strategy memo (target Jun. 2023). Coordination with Caldwell & Strauss LLP (Angela Firth) on existing IP portfolio implications.
31Article VIII — Representations & WarrantiesMeridian rep re: data accuracy and completenessQuorum requires Meridian to represent that Licensed Data is materially accurate, complete, and current as of delivery date.Meridian limits rep to 'commercially reasonable efforts' to maintain accuracy; disclaims warranties of completeness or fitness for particular purpose.OpenHighYellowPatricia HengPriya NairDerek Fontaine2022-12-022023-01-15Standard negotiation point. Quorum needs sufficient quality reps for underwriting reliance.
32Article VIII — Representations & WarrantiesMeridian rep re: authority and non-infringementQuorum requires Meridian to represent it has full authority to license all data products and that the license does not infringe third-party IP.Meridian agrees to authority rep; limits non-infringement rep to Meridian's knowledge.Partially AgreedMediumYellowMarcus WeillGregory StahlBen Overstreet2022-11-042023-01-15Authority rep agreed. Knowledge qualifier on non-infringement under discussion.
33Article IX — IndemnificationMeridian indemnification of Quorum for data-related claimsQuorum seeks broad indemnification by Meridian for third-party claims arising from Licensed Data (IP infringement, FCRA violations, data inaccuracy).Meridian limits indemnification to claims of IP infringement by the Licensed Data itself; excludes claims arising from Quorum's use of, or Derived Data created from, Licensed Data.OpenHighYellowMarcus WeillGregory StahlBen Overstreet2022-12-022023-01-15Scope of Meridian's indemnity tied to IP ownership resolution in Article VII.
34Article IX — IndemnificationQuorum indemnification of MeridianQuorum agrees to indemnify Meridian for claims arising from Quorum's use of Licensed Data outside the scope of the license or in violation of applicable law.Meridian seeks broader Quorum indemnity covering all Derived Data commercialization claims.OpenMediumYellowMarcus WeillGregory StahlBen Overstreet2022-12-022023-01-15Breadth of Quorum indemnity depends on Article VII outcome.
35Article X — Limitation of LiabilityLiability capQuorum proposes mutual liability cap equal to 2x the aggregate fees paid/payable in the prior 12-month period.Meridian proposes mutual cap equal to 1x aggregate fees paid in the prior 12-month period.OpenHighYellowPatricia HengGregory StahlGraham Whitley2022-12-022023-01-15Likely to settle between 1x and 2x. Carve-outs for IP infringement and data breach to be negotiated separately.
36Article X — Limitation of LiabilityExclusion of consequential damages — carve-outsQuorum insists on carve-outs from consequential damages exclusion for: (a) IP infringement, (b) data breaches, (c) willful misconduct, (d) confidentiality breaches.Meridian agrees to carve-outs for willful misconduct and confidentiality breaches only.OpenHighYellowPatricia HengGregory StahlGraham Whitley2022-12-022023-01-15Quorum's data breach carve-out is important given cyber-risk exposure. IP carve-out linked to Article VII.
37Article XI — InsuranceMeridian insurance minimumsQuorum requires Meridian to maintain: CGL $5,000,000/occurrence; Cyber/Tech E&O $25,000,000 aggregate.Meridian agrees to stated minimums.AgreedMediumGreenMarcus WeillClaudia ReevesBen Overstreet2022-12-022022-12-02Agreed.
38Article XI — InsuranceQuorum insurance minimumsMeridian requires Quorum to maintain: CGL $5,000,000/occurrence; Cyber liability $50,000,000 aggregate.Quorum agrees to stated minimums.AgreedMediumGreenMarcus WeillClaudia ReevesBen Overstreet2022-12-022022-12-02Agreed.
39Article XII — ConfidentialityConfidentiality obligations — term and scopeQuorum proposes confidentiality obligations survive for 5 years post-termination; trade secrets protected indefinitely.Meridian proposes 3 years post-termination; agrees to indefinite trade secret protection.OpenMediumYellowLisa JohannsenGregory StahlBen Overstreet2022-12-022023-01-15Likely to settle at 4–5 years. Cross-reference to Mutual NDA (NDA-QIH-MCI-2022-001) obligations.
40Article XIII — Governing Law & Dispute ResolutionGoverning lawQuorum proposes New York law (without regard to conflicts-of-law principles).Meridian accepts New York governing law.AgreedMediumGreenWendy SchultzGregory StahlGraham Whitley2022-11-042022-12-02Agreed.
41Article XIII — Governing Law & Dispute ResolutionDispute resolution mechanismQuorum proposes exclusive jurisdiction in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York or the Commercial Division of the New York Supreme Court, New York County.Meridian proposes binding arbitration under AAA Commercial Rules, seated in New York, NY, with a three-arbitrator panel.OpenHighYellowWendy SchultzGregory StahlGraham Whitley2022-11-042023-01-15Quorum strongly prefers court jurisdiction for discovery rights and appellate review. Meridian prefers arbitration confidentiality. Significant gap.
42Article XIV — Service LevelsUptime commitmentQuorum requires 99.9% monthly uptime for all API and batch delivery services.Meridian proposes 99.5% monthly uptime.OpenHighYellowPatricia HengPriya NairDerek Fontaine2022-12-022023-01-15SLA schedule being drafted separately. Patricia Heng benchmarking against industry standards.
43Article XIV — Service LevelsService credits for SLA failuresQuorum proposes graduated service credits: 5% of monthly fee for each 0.1% below uptime target, up to 30% credit cap per month.Meridian proposes 2% per 0.1% shortfall, capped at 10% of monthly fee.OpenHighYellowPatricia HengPriya NairDerek Fontaine2022-12-022023-01-15Linked to SLA schedule. Material gap on credit caps.
44Article XIV — Service LevelsSLA termination triggerQuorum proposes right to terminate if uptime falls below 98% for any 3 consecutive months.Meridian opposes SLA-based termination trigger.OpenHighYellowPatricia HengPriya NairGraham Whitley2022-12-022023-01-15Important Quorum protection against chronic underperformance.
45Article XV — Audit RightsQuorum audit rights over Meridian's data-handling practicesQuorum seeks annual audit right over Meridian's security practices, data handling, and SLA performance, with right to use independent third-party auditors.Meridian agrees to audit right limited to once per year with 30 days' advance notice; Meridian may require Quorum to accept SOC 2 Type II report in lieu of on-site audit.Partially AgreedMediumYellowDavid CartwrightClaudia ReevesLena Vasquez2022-12-022023-01-15Annual frequency agreed. Scope (on-site vs. SOC 2 report reliance) still under discussion.
46Conditions Precedent / ClosingStandish National Bank lender consent under Section 7.12(b)Quorum acknowledges the $60M license value exceeds the $25M IP license threshold in Section 7.12(b) of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (dated June 15, 2021) with Standish National Bank, N.A., by $35M (240% of threshold). Lender consent or waiver required before execution.Meridian is aware of the covenant requirement; requests that Quorum obtain consent as a condition precedent to closing, not a Meridian obligation.OpenHighYellowMarcus WeillGregory Stahl / Thomas NgN/A (Quorum internal / Standish)2022-11-042023-01-15Draft consent request letter sent to Philip Yardley at Standish (Nov. 2022). Marcus Weill also analyzing structuring alternatives to mitigate trigger. Follow-up planned for Feb. 2023.
47Conditions Precedent / ClosingQuorum board authorizationDraft board resolution being prepared for Quorum board (Harrison Kimble, Chair) to authorize execution of MDLA and related documents.N/A — Quorum internal matter.DeferredMediumYellowMarcus WeillCarolyn WhitfordN/A2022-12-022023-01-15Board resolution template prepared. Actual authorization deferred pending resolution of material open terms.
48Schedules & ExhibitsTechnical Schedule A — Data Delivery SpecificationsQuorum and Meridian technical teams (Priya Nair / Meridian counterpart) to finalize data formats, record schemas, API specifications, and data-quality acceptance criteria.Under joint development; initial draft circulated.OpenMediumYellowOmar SiddiquiPriya NairDerek Fontaine2022-12-022023-01-15Omar Siddiqui coordinating with Priya Nair. Draft Technical Schedule A in progress (target Feb. 2023).
49Schedules & ExhibitsData Security Addendum (DSA)C&H initial DSA draft in development by David Cartwright and Lisa Johannsen. Will cover SOC 2/ISO 27001 requirements, encryption, access controls, penetration testing, breach notification, and audit rights.Meridian has not yet seen draft.OpenHighYellowDavid Cartwright / Lisa JohannsenClaudia ReevesLena Vasquez2022-12-022023-01-15Target delivery: Jan. 2023. Will incorporate 23 NYCRR 500 requirements.

50

SUMMARY STATISTICS

Status Breakdown:Open30Agreed12Partially Agreed5Deferred1N/A (items with Deferred status awaiting resolution)Total: 50 (2 items have combined status categories — totals reconcile excluding rounding)
Priority Breakdown:Critical12High20Medium15Low3Total: 50
Risk Level Breakdown:Red12Yellow26Green12Total: 50

[sheet: Summary Dashboard]

CategoryTotal ItemsAgreedPartially AgreedOpenDeferredCritical Open Items
Definitions (Art. I)301202
Grant of License (Art. II)410302
Data Products & Delivery (Art. III)321000
Fees & Payment (Art. IV)530201
Term & Termination (Art. V)410301
Data Security & Privacy (Art. VI)521200
IP & Derived Data (Art. VII)600606
Reps & Warranties (Art. VIII)201100
Indemnification (Art. IX)200200
Limitation of Liability (Art. X)200200
Insurance (Art. XI)220000
Confidentiality (Art. XII)100100
Governing Law & Dispute Resolution (Art. XIII)210100
Service Levels (Art. XIV)300300
Audit Rights (Art. XV)101000
Conditions Precedent / Closing200110
Schedules & Exhibits300300
TOTAL5012532112
Percentage Complete (Agreed + Partially Agreed / Total)34%
Critical Open Items as % of Total24%

[sheet: Key Contacts]

NameTitleOrganizationRole in MatterEmailPhone
Leonard CrossPartner, TaxCalderwood & Harkness LLPResponsible Partner[placeholder][placeholder]
Nathaniel BowerPartner, Bankruptcy & RestructuringCalderwood & Harkness LLPBilling Partner[placeholder][placeholder]
Wendy SchultzAssociate, intellectual PropertyCalderwood & Harkness LLPLead Associate[placeholder][placeholder]
Omar SiddiquiAssociate, intellectual PropertyCalderwood & Harkness LLPWorking Associate[placeholder][placeholder]
Patricia HengSenior Counsel, Technology TransactionsCalderwood & Harkness LLPSubject-matter advisor[placeholder][placeholder]
David CartwrightPartner, Data Privacy & CybersecurityCalderwood & Harkness LLPPrivacy regulatory advisor[placeholder][placeholder]
Lisa JohannsenAssociate, Data Privacy & CybersecurityCalderwood & Harkness LLPPrivacy associate[placeholder][placeholder]
Marcus WeillAssociate, Corporate/CommercialCalderwood & Harkness LLPCorporate/commercial support[placeholder][placeholder]
Carolyn WhitfordGeneral Counsel & EVPQuorum Insurance Holdings Corp.Client GC[placeholder][placeholder]
Gregory StahlVP, Legal AffairsQuorum Insurance Holdings Corp.Day-to-day legal contact[placeholder][placeholder]
Rajesh AnandChief Data OfficerQuorum Insurance Holdings Corp.Data strategy lead[placeholder][placeholder]
Thomas NgVP, Enterprise ProcurementQuorum Insurance Holdings Corp.Procurement lead[placeholder][placeholder]
Priya NairDirector, Data EngineeringQuorum Insurance Holdings Corp.Technical integration lead[placeholder][placeholder]
Diane LowellSVP, Underwriting AnalyticsQuorum Insurance Holdings Corp.Business sponsor[placeholder][placeholder]
Claudia ReevesVP, Regulatory & ComplianceQuorum Insurance Holdings Corp.Insurance regulatory review[placeholder][placeholder]
Harrison KimbleChairman of the BoardQuorum Insurance Holdings Corp.Board Chair (authorization)[placeholder][placeholder]
Graham WhitleyPartner, Technology & LicensingKessler Pruitt & Ashe LLPCounterparty lead counsel[placeholder][placeholder]
Nina ChastainAssociateKessler Pruitt & Ashe LLPCounterparty associate[placeholder][placeholder]
Derek FontaineAssociateKessler Pruitt & Ashe LLPCounterparty associate[placeholder][placeholder]
Arthur PenningtonGeneral CounselMeridian Credit intelligence, Inc.Counterparty GC[placeholder][placeholder]
Keith MarlowSVP, Data Licensing & PartnershipsMeridian Credit intelligence, Inc.Counterparty business lead[placeholder][placeholder]
Lena VasquezChief Privacy OfficerMeridian Credit intelligence, Inc.Counterparty privacy[placeholder][placeholder]
Ben OverstreetVP, Legal AffairsMeridian Credit intelligence, Inc.Counterparty legal (deputy)[placeholder][placeholder]
Jordan PrescottDirector, Implementation ServicesMeridian Credit intelligence, Inc.Counterparty implementation lead[placeholder][placeholder]
Philip YardleyRelationship ManagerStandish National Bank, N.A.Lender contact (covenant consent)[placeholder][placeholder]
Franklin OseiManaging DirectorPinnacle Ridge Advisory LLCData-pricing benchmark consultant[placeholder][placeholder]
Angela FirthPartnerCaldwell & Strauss LLPQuorum's regular IP counsel (coordination)[placeholder][placeholder]

[sheet: Version History]

VersionDateAuthorDescription of Changes
v0.12022-10-05Omar SiddiquiInitial draft based on Term Sheet Issues Matrix
v0.22022-11-10Wendy SchultzUpdated to reflect issues identified in Meridian's form MDLA (KP&A draft dated Nov. 4, 2022)
v0.32022-12-05Wendy Schultz / Omar SiddiquiUpdated to reflect Quorum's comprehensive redline delivered Dec. 2, 2022; added Articles VII–XV issues
v1.02023-01-15Wendy SchultzComprehensive update pre-Jan. 18 negotiation session; all 50 items populated with current positions, status, and priority. Circulated to Leonard Cross and client team.