CALDERWOOD & HARKNESS LLP 375 Park Avenue, 42nd Floor New York, New York 10152 Telephone: (212) 554-8000
MEMORANDUM
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION
Date: April 10, 2023
To: Jonathan R. Caldwell 418 East 72nd Street, Apt. 14A New York, New York 10021
From: Sylvia Hartwell, Specialist Partner (Tax), Calderwood & Harkness LLP with assistance from Monica Reyes, Lead Associate, and Elliot Nguyen, Working Associate
Re: Zeroed-Out GRAT Structuring — Caldwell 2023 Securities GRAT ("GRAT A"), Caldwell 2023 Realty GRAT ("GRAT B"), and Caldwell 2023 Carried Interest GRAT ("GRAT C")
Matter No.: 1034-00004 / Billing Code 78412-JRC
cc: Victoria Chambers, Responsible Partner Howard Quinn, Billing Partner
Right-click to update Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
This memorandum sets forth the detailed technical analysis underlying the design of three zeroed-out Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (collectively, the "GRATs") as part of your comprehensive generational estate plan. The memorandum has been prepared at your request and in connection with our ongoing engagement to structure and implement an integrated wealth-transfer strategy for the Caldwell family. It is intended to serve as a definitive record of the structural considerations, legal authorities, economic assumptions, and computational methodologies that inform the GRAT design, and to document the advice rendered in connection therewith.
We have designed three separate GRATs, each tailored to a distinct asset class within your overall portfolio, to maximize transfer efficiency and diversify the structural risk inherent in any single GRAT. The three GRATs are as follows:
GRAT A — Caldwell 2023 Securities GRAT. This GRAT will be funded on April 15, 2023, with approximately $60,000,000 in publicly traded securities drawn from your liquid portfolio managed by Havensbrook Wealth Advisors LLC. GRAT A is designed as a two-year zeroed-out GRAT, reflecting the liquid nature of the contributed assets and the shorter time horizon appropriate for publicly traded securities. The two-year term also minimizes mortality risk.
GRAT B — Caldwell 2023 Realty GRAT. This GRAT will be funded on May 1, 2023, with membership interests in Stonecrest Realty Holdings LLC representing approximately 59.7% of the total entity, having a pre-discount fair market value of $80,000,000. GRAT B is designed as a three-year zeroed-out GRAT. The contributed membership interests are eligible for a combined 25% lack-of-marketability and lack-of-control discount, resulting in a post-discount fair market value of $60,000,000 for gift tax purposes.
GRAT C — Caldwell 2023 Carried Interest GRAT. This GRAT will be funded on June 1, 2023, with limited partnership interests and carried-interest positions in Caldwell Ridgeline Capital Funds IV, V, and VI, having a total pre-discount fair market value of $38,000,000. GRAT C is likewise designed as a three-year zeroed-out GRAT. The contributed interests are eligible for combined discounts of 30%–35%, resulting in a blended post-discount fair market value of $25,300,000 for gift tax purposes.
In total, the three GRATs will be funded with assets having an aggregate fair market value of $178,000,000 on a pre-discount basis. All three GRATs are designed as "zeroed-out" trusts under Internal Revenue Code ("IRC" or the "Code") § 2702, meaning that the annuity payments retained by you as grantor are calibrated so that the present value of the retained annuity interest equals the full fair market value of the contributed property. This produces a taxable gift of zero dollars ($0) for each GRAT, thereby eliminating any gift tax liability or consumption of your available gift tax exemption.
The designated remainder beneficiary for all three GRATs is the Caldwell Family Dynasty Trust (the "Dynasty Trust"), a Delaware-situs irrevocable trust with Northgate Trust Company of Delaware serving as institutional co-trustee. Upon the expiration of each GRAT's annuity term, any assets remaining in the GRAT — that is, any appreciation in excess of the annuity payments — will pass to the Dynasty Trust free of gift tax and estate tax.
Based on our modeling and the projections set forth in the GRAT Sensitivity Analysis — Return Scenarios workbook prepared by Elliot Nguyen, we project that, assuming the GRAT assets outperform the applicable § 7520 hurdle rate by approximately 4% per annum on a blended basis, the three GRATs will transfer an estimated $35,000,000 to $50,000,000 in excess appreciation to the Dynasty Trust free of gift and estate tax. This represents projected estate tax savings of approximately $24,000,000 to $30,000,000 (at a 40% estate tax rate), a significant component of the overall Caldwell family wealth-transfer strategy.
This memorandum addresses the following topics in detail: (a) the legal framework under IRC § 2702 and the Walton-type zeroed-out GRAT structure; (b) the applicable § 7520 valuation rates for each GRAT; (c) the annuity payment calculations for each GRAT; (d) the mortality risk associated with each GRAT term; (e) asset selection criteria and valuation discount considerations; (f) grantor trust status and income tax implications during and after the GRAT terms; (g) the effect of the current § 7520 rate environment on transfer efficiency; (h) coordination with the Dynasty Trust, including GST exemption allocation issues; and (i) risks, limitations, and legislative considerations.
II. Legal Framework — IRC § 2702 and Zeroed-Out GRATs
A. Statutory Overview of IRC § 2702
IRC § 2702 governs the valuation of interests retained by a transferor (or an applicable family member) when the transferor makes a transfer in trust to or for the benefit of a member of the transferor's family. Section 2702 was enacted as part of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990 to address perceived abuses in the valuation of retained interests in trust, where taxpayers could claim artificially high values for retained interests, thereby understating the value of the transferred interest for gift tax purposes.
The general rule under § 2702(a)(2)(A) is straightforward and draconian: any interest retained by the transferor in a trust is valued at zero for purposes of determining the value of the gift, unless the retained interest is a "qualified interest." This means that, absent the qualified interest exception, a transfer in trust to a family member would be treated as a gift of the entire trust corpus, with no credit for the value of any retained interest.
A "qualified interest" is defined in § 2702(b) and includes three categories:
1. Qualified annuity interest (§ 2702(b)(1)): the right to receive a fixed amount payable not less frequently than annually for a specified term of years or for the life of the term holder.
2. Qualified unitrust interest (§ 2702(b)(2)): the right to receive a fixed percentage of the net fair market value of the trust assets, determined annually, payable not less frequently than annually for a specified term of years or for the life of the term holder.
3. Qualified remainder interest (§ 2702(b)(3)): a noncontingent remainder interest if all other interests in the trust are either qualified annuity interests or qualified unitrust interests.
For the Caldwell GRATs, the relevant category is the qualified annuity interest. When the grantor retains a qualified annuity interest, the taxable gift is computed as the difference between: (i) the fair market value of the property transferred to the trust, and (ii) the present value of the retained annuity interest, calculated using the applicable § 7520 rate and the IRS actuarial tables. If the annuity payments are calibrated so that the present value of the retained annuity equals the fair market value of the contributed property, the taxable gift is reduced to zero — or, more precisely, to as close to zero as is mathematically possible given the actuarial constraints.
B. The Walton-Type Zeroed-Out GRAT
The structural foundation for the Caldwell GRATs is the so-called "Walton-type" zeroed-out GRAT, named after the Tax Court's decision in Walton v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 589 (2000), acq., 2003-44 I.R.B. 964. In Walton, the Tax Court addressed whether a GRAT could be structured so that the present value of the retained annuity interest equaled the full fair market value of the property contributed to the trust, thereby producing a taxable gift of zero. The IRS initially challenged this approach, arguing that the regulations required the remainder interest to have a positive value. The Tax Court rejected the IRS's position, and the IRS ultimately acquiesced in the result.
Treasury Regulations § 25.2702-3 govern the requirements for a qualified annuity interest. These regulations permit the annuity amount to be set at any fixed dollar amount or fixed percentage of the initial FMV of the trust corpus, without an upper limit, so long as the other regulatory requirements are satisfied. There is no requirement that the remainder interest have a minimum value. Accordingly, the annuity can be calibrated to produce a remainder interest with a value of zero — or, in practice, as close to zero as the actuarial computations permit (the rounding conventions in the IRS actuarial tables may produce a de minimis positive remainder, but this is inconsequential).
The key structural feature of a zeroed-out GRAT is that the annuity payments are mathematically calibrated so that the present value of the grantor's retained annuity stream, discounted at the applicable § 7520 rate and adjusted for the grantor's mortality probability, equals the value of the property contributed to the GRAT. The economic genius of this structure lies in its asymmetric risk profile:
• If the GRAT assets appreciate at a rate exceeding the § 7520 rate during the annuity term, the excess appreciation remains in the GRAT after the annuity payments have been satisfied and passes to the remainder beneficiary — here, the Caldwell Family Dynasty Trust — free of gift tax and estate tax.
• If the GRAT assets appreciate at or below the § 7520 rate, the entire corpus is returned to the grantor through annuity payments, and no wealth transfer occurs. Critically, however, no gift tax cost has been incurred, because the GRAT was zeroed out. The grantor has not consumed any of his gift or estate tax exemption, and has not paid any gift tax.
This "heads I win, tails I break even" dynamic is the fundamental attraction of the zeroed-out GRAT structure. The grantor has a free option on the excess appreciation of the GRAT assets above the § 7520 hurdle rate, with no downside risk in terms of transfer tax cost.
C. Regulatory Requirements for Qualified Annuity Interests
The Treasury Regulations prescribe detailed requirements for a retained interest to qualify as a qualified annuity interest. Compliance with these requirements is essential; failure to satisfy any requirement results in the retained interest being valued at zero, which would cause the entire transfer to be treated as a taxable gift. The principal requirements, and the manner in which the Caldwell GRATs comply with each, are as follows:
Fixed Annuity Amount. The annuity must be a fixed dollar amount or a fixed percentage of the initial fair market value of the trust corpus, determined at the time of the transfer. Treas. Reg. § 25.2702-3(b)(1)(ii). The amount may not be tied to the income of the trust, nor may it be a variable amount determined by reference to any external standard other than the initial FMV. All three Caldwell GRATs use a fixed dollar amount for the annuity, calculated at the time of funding and stated in the trust agreement.
Annual Payment Requirement. The annuity must be payable not less frequently than annually. Treas. Reg. § 25.2702-3(b)(3). The regulations provide that payment within 105 days after the anniversary of the trust's creation is treated as timely. Id. The Caldwell GRAT trust agreements provide for annual annuity payments on each anniversary of the funding date, with a grace period consistent with the 105-day rule.
Graduated Annuity Option. The annuity amount may increase from year to year, provided that the increase does not exceed 120% of the preceding year's annuity amount (i.e., a maximum 20% per year escalation). Treas. Reg. § 25.2702-3(b)(1)(ii)(B). This graduated GRAT structure can enhance transfer efficiency by back-loading annuity payments to later years when the GRAT assets have had more time to appreciate. However, after careful analysis, we have determined that level (non-graduated) annuity payments are appropriate for all three Caldwell GRATs. This decision reflects the specific asset profiles: (i) the publicly traded securities in GRAT A are liquid and can readily support front-loaded payments; (ii) the real estate interests in GRAT B are expected to generate relatively stable returns; and (iii) the carried-interest and LP interests in GRAT C may generate unpredictable distributions that are difficult to match to a graduated schedule. The level annuity structure also provides administrative simplicity and reduces the risk of computational error.
No Additional Contributions. No additional contributions may be made to the GRAT after the initial funding. Treas. Reg. § 25.2702-3(b)(5). The Caldwell GRAT trust agreements expressly prohibit additional contributions.
No Debt Instruments in Satisfaction of Annuity. The trustee may not issue a note, other debt instrument, option, or other similar financial arrangement in satisfaction of the annuity obligation. Treas. Reg. § 25.2702-3(d)(5). This requirement ensures that annuity payments represent actual transfers of value from the trust to the grantor, rather than mere promises to pay. The Caldwell GRAT trust agreements expressly prohibit satisfaction of annuity obligations through notes, IOUs, or other debt instruments.
Power of Substitution. The regulations do not prohibit the grantor from retaining a power of substitution — i.e., the power to reacquire trust property by substituting assets of equivalent value. This power is specifically contemplated by IRC § 675(4)(C) and has been validated by Revenue Ruling 2008-22 as not causing the trust to be treated as owned by the grantor for estate tax purposes (provided the power is exercisable in a non-fiduciary capacity and the trustee has a duty to ensure equivalence of value). The Caldwell GRAT trust agreements include a power of substitution, which is particularly relevant for GRAT B (Stonecrest membership interests) and GRAT C (Caldwell Ridgeline interests), where in-kind annuity payments may be necessary or desirable, and where the grantor may wish to swap assets into or out of the GRAT for tax planning or liquidity purposes.
III. Applicable § 7520 Rates
A. Determination of the § 7520 Rate
Under IRC § 7520, the applicable valuation rate for purposes of computing the present value of annuity, life estate, term-of-years, and remainder interests is equal to 120% of the applicable federal midterm rate (compounded annually) for the month in which the valuation date falls. The § 7520 rate is published monthly by the Internal Revenue Service and is available in Revenue Rulings issued during the first week of each month.
The § 7520 rate is a critical variable in GRAT planning because it directly determines the present value of the retained annuity interest and, therefore, the magnitude of the annuity payment required to achieve a zeroed-out structure. A lower § 7520 rate produces a higher present value for any given annuity stream (because future payments are discounted at a lower rate), which means that a smaller annuity payment is sufficient to zero out the GRAT. Conversely, a higher § 7520 rate requires larger annuity payments to achieve the same result, but also sets a higher "hurdle rate" that the GRAT assets must exceed in order to generate a wealth transfer to the remainder beneficiary.
Under IRC § 7520(a), the taxpayer may elect to use the § 7520 rate for the month of the transfer or for either of the two months immediately preceding the month of the transfer. This election allows the taxpayer to select the most favorable rate from a three-month window. The election is made on the gift tax return (Form 709) and is irrevocable once made.
B. Rates for Each GRAT
We have analyzed the § 7520 rates for the relevant months and have identified the most favorable rate for each GRAT, as follows:
GRAT A — Caldwell 2023 Securities GRAT. GRAT A is to be funded on April 15, 2023. The § 7520 rates for the three eligible months are: January 2023 (5.2%), February 2023 (5.0%), and March 2023 (5.0%). We recommend electing the March 2023 rate of 5.0%, which is tied as the lowest of the three available rates. (The February 2023 rate is also 5.0%; either month may be elected.)
GRAT B — Caldwell 2023 Realty GRAT. GRAT B is to be funded on May 1, 2023. The § 7520 rates for the three eligible months are: February 2023 (5.0%), March 2023 (5.0%), and April 2023 (5.0%). All three months produce the same rate of 5.0%. We recommend electing the April 2023 rate for administrative simplicity, though any of the three months may be selected.
GRAT C — Caldwell 2023 Carried Interest GRAT. GRAT C is to be funded on June 1, 2023. The § 7520 rates for the three eligible months are: March 2023 (5.0%), April 2023 (5.0%), and May 2023 (5.0%). As with GRAT B, all three months produce a rate of 5.0%. We recommend electing the May 2023 rate.
Accordingly, all three GRATs utilize a § 7520 rate of 5.0% for purposes of computing the present value of the retained annuity interest and the zeroed-out annuity payment amount. The uniformity of the rate across all three GRATs simplifies the analysis and modeling.
C. Impact of the § 7520 Rate on Transfer Efficiency
The current 5.0% § 7520 rate represents a historically elevated rate environment. For context, the § 7520 rate fell to a historic low of 0.4% in September 2021, and remained below 2.0% for much of 2020 and 2021. During that period, GRAT planning was exceptionally attractive because the hurdle rate was essentially zero, making it virtually certain that GRAT assets would outperform the hurdle and generate a wealth transfer. The subsequent rise in interest rates — driven by Federal Reserve monetary tightening — has increased the hurdle rate significantly.
Despite the higher hurdle rate, the GRAT structure remains highly effective for the Caldwell estate plan for several reasons:
First, the carried-interest and private equity fund interests contributed to GRAT C have historically generated returns of 12%–18% net IRR, far exceeding the 5.0% hurdle rate. Even in a conservative scenario, these assets are expected to outperform the hurdle by a substantial margin.
Second, the real estate interests contributed to GRAT B are expected to generate total returns (combining rental income, operating cash flow, and capital appreciation) in excess of 5.0% per annum, particularly given the strong fundamentals of the New York metropolitan commercial real estate market and the quality of the Stonecrest property portfolio.
Third, the valuation discounts applicable to the Stonecrest membership interests (25%) and the Caldwell Ridgeline interests (30%–35%) effectively reduce the hurdle rate against which transfer efficiency is measured. Because the annuity is computed on the pre-discount value, but the underlying assets are worth more than the discounted value, the GRAT assets need to appreciate by less than 5.0% in real economic terms in order to clear the hurdle.
Fourth, the zeroed-out design ensures that there is no gift tax downside even if the hurdle is not met. In a scenario where the GRAT assets underperform the § 7520 rate, the annuity payments return the corpus to the grantor, and the only cost is the legal and administrative expense of establishing the GRAT.
We have prepared a separate GRAT Sensitivity Analysis — Return Scenarios workbook (prepared by Elliot Nguyen) that models transfer efficiency at assumed annual return rates of 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% across all three GRATs. At a blended annual return of 9% across all three GRATs, the estimated excess appreciation transferred to the Dynasty Trust is between $35,000,000 and $50,000,000 over the respective GRAT terms, representing estate tax savings of approximately $14,000,000 to $20,000,000 (at a 40% estate tax rate) on the transferred appreciation alone, before considering the additional savings from the valuation discounts and the income tax benefits of grantor trust treatment.
IV. Annuity Payment Calculations
A. General Methodology
Each GRAT annuity is calculated using a standard actuarial methodology so that the present value of the annuity stream, discounted at the applicable § 7520 rate and adjusted for the grantor's mortality probability, equals the fair market value of the property contributed to the GRAT. The relevant actuarial tables are those published by the IRS in Publication 1457 (including Table B for term-certain annuity factors and Table S for single-life mortality factors). The calculation incorporates the grantor's age at the time of the transfer, rounded to the nearest birthday.
Jonathan R. Caldwell was born on March 14, 1956, and is currently age 67. His age at the funding of each GRAT is as follows: 67 years and 1 month for GRAT A (funded April 15, 2023); 67 years and 1.5 months for GRAT B (funded May 1, 2023); and 67 years and 2.5 months for GRAT C (funded June 1, 2023). For purposes of the actuarial calculations, his age is rounded to 67 for all three GRATs.
For a zeroed-out GRAT, the governing equation is:
PV(Annuity) = FMV(Contributed Property)
This equation is solved for the annual annuity payment amount. The present value of the annuity is computed as:
PV(Annuity) = Annual Payment × Annuity Factor (term, § 7520 rate, mortality adjustment)
Therefore:
Annual Payment = FMV(Contributed Property) / Annuity Factor
The annuity factor is the present value of $1 per year payable for the specified term, discounted at the § 7520 rate and adjusted for the probability that the grantor will survive to receive each payment (using the applicable mortality table). Because the Caldwell GRATs are term-of-years trusts (not life-of-grantor trusts), the mortality adjustment has a relatively modest effect on the annuity factor, particularly for short terms.
All three Caldwell GRATs use level (non-graduated) annuity payments. As discussed in Section II.C above, the graduated GRAT option (allowing up to 20% annual escalation) was considered and rejected in favor of the level structure, which best suits the specific asset profiles and administrative requirements of these GRATs.
B. GRAT A — Caldwell 2023 Securities GRAT
Corpus at Funding: $60,000,000 in publicly traded securities, consisting of a diversified portfolio of domestic and international equities, fixed-income instruments, and exchange-traded funds, drawn from Mr. Caldwell's $112,000,000 liquid securities holdings managed by Havensbrook Wealth Advisors LLC (Diana R. Linden, Managing Director).
Funding Date: April 15, 2023.
Term: 2 years.
§ 7520 Rate: 5.0% (March 2023, elected under § 7520(a)).
Annuity Payment Calculation:
The present value annuity factor for a 2-year term at 5.0%, adjusted for the mortality probability of a male age 67 under IRS Table 2000CM, is used to compute the level annuity. The annuity factor reflects the present value of $1 per year payable at the end of each of the two years, discounted at 5.0%, with a de minimis mortality adjustment reflecting the probability that Mr. Caldwell will survive to receive each payment.
Using the applicable annuity factor, the zeroed-out annual annuity for GRAT A is computed as follows:
Annual Annuity = $60,000,000 / Annuity Factor (2-year, 5.0%, age 67)
Annual Annuity = $32,195,122
Payment Dates: April 15, 2024 (first annuity payment) and April 15, 2025 (second and final annuity payment).
Total Annuity Payments: $32,195,122 × 2 = $64,390,244.
Taxable Gift Value: $60,000,000 FMV of contributed property minus $60,000,000 present value of retained annuity interest = $0.
Annuity Satisfaction: The annuity payments are expected to be satisfied in cash and/or through the distribution of publicly traded securities from the GRAT to Mr. Caldwell. Because the GRAT A assets consist entirely of publicly traded securities, there is no valuation complexity associated with annuity payments — the securities are valued at their market price per share on the date of distribution. The GRAT A trustee may sell securities within the trust to generate cash for annuity payments, or may distribute securities in kind at their fair market value on the distribution date. As discussed in Section VIII below, distributions from a grantor trust to the grantor are not taxable events for income tax purposes.
C. GRAT B — Caldwell 2023 Realty GRAT
Corpus at Funding: $80,000,000 (pre-discount fair market value) in Stonecrest Realty Holdings LLC membership interests, representing approximately 59.7% of the total membership interests in Stonecrest. Stonecrest Realty Holdings LLC is a New York limited liability company with its principal offices at 330 Madison Avenue, Suite 2401, New York, New York 10017, and is managed by Robert M. Sinclair, Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Caldwell currently owns 100% of Stonecrest. The total entity value of Stonecrest has been appraised at $134,000,000 by Ashford Valuation Group LLC; accordingly, the 59.7% membership interest has a pre-discount fair market value of approximately $134,000,000 × 59.7% ≈ $80,000,000.
Valuation discount: A combined 25% lack-of-marketability and lack-of-control discount is applied to the contributed membership interests for gift tax purposes. The rationale for this discount is discussed in detail in Section VII below. The post-discount fair market value of the contributed interests is $80,000,000 × (1 – 0.25) = $60,000,000.
Funding Date: May 1, 2023.
Term: 3 years.
§ 7520 Rate: 5.0% (April 2023, elected under § 7520(a)).
Annuity Payment Calculation:
The annuity for GRAT B is computed on the pre-discount fair market value of $80,000,000. This is the value of the assets actually contributed to the trust. The valuation discount affects the gift tax computation (reducing the gift tax value of the contributed property), but the annuity must be sufficient to zero out the pre-discount value. In other words, the zeroed-out computation requires that the present value of the retained annuity interest equal or exceed the fair market value of the contributed property as reported on the gift tax return, which is the discounted value. However, to ensure a truly zeroed-out structure and to maximize the annuity obligation (which maximizes the return of assets to the grantor and minimizes the remainder interest), we compute the annuity based on the pre-discount FMV.
Using the present value annuity factor for a 3-year term at 5.0%, adjusted for the mortality probability of a male age 67, the zeroed-out annual annuity for GRAT B is computed as follows:
Annual Annuity = $80,000,000 / Annuity Factor (3-year, 5.0%, age 67)
Annual Annuity = $29,375,859
Payment Dates: May 1, 2024 (first annuity payment); May 1, 2025 (second annuity payment); and May 1, 2026 (third and final annuity payment).
Total Annuity Payments: $29,375,859 × 3 = $88,127,577.
Taxable Gift Value: $0.
Annuity Satisfaction: The annual annuity obligation of $29,375,859 may be satisfied in kind through the distribution of Stonecrest membership interests from the GRAT to Mr. Caldwell, or through the distribution of cash or other assets held by the GRAT. In-kind distributions will be valued at fair market value on the date of distribution, which may require periodic updated appraisals from Ashford Valuation Group LLC. Mr. Caldwell's power of substitution under the GRAT B trust agreement allows him to reacquire Stonecrest membership interests by substituting property of equivalent value, which provides additional flexibility in managing the composition of GRAT B assets and satisfying annuity obligations.
We note that the Stonecrest properties generate rental income and operating cash flow at the entity level. To the extent that Stonecrest distributes cash to its members (including the GRAT B trust as a 59.7% member), those distributions will be available to satisfy the annuity obligation. If Stonecrest distributions are insufficient to satisfy the annuity obligation in full, the trustee must distribute membership interests in kind or other trust assets to make up the shortfall.
D. GRAT C — Caldwell 2023 Carried Interest GRAT
Corpus at Funding: $38,000,000 (pre-discount fair market value) consisting of the following limited partnership interests and carried-interest positions in private equity funds managed by Caldwell Ridgeline Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with principal offices at 280 Park Avenue, 35th Floor, New York, New York 10017 (Gregory S. Fenton, Chief Financial Officer):
• Fund IV LP Interest (vintage 2015): Fair market value of $12,000,000. A 35% combined lack-of-marketability and minority interest discount is applied, producing a post-discount fair market value of $12,000,000 × (1 – 0.35) = $7,800,000.
• Fund V LP Interest (vintage 2018): Fair market value of $14,000,000. A 35% combined lack-of-marketability and minority interest discount is applied, producing a post-discount fair market value of $14,000,000 × (1 – 0.35) = $9,100,000.
• Fund VI Carried Interest (vintage 2021): Fair market value of $12,000,000. A 30% discount is applied, reflecting the illiquidity and transfer restrictions applicable to carried-interest positions, producing a post-discount fair market value of $12,000,000 × (1 – 0.30) = $8,400,000.
Total Pre-discount FMV: $12,000,000 + $14,000,000 + $12,000,000 = $38,000,000.
Total Post-discount FMV: $7,800,000 + $9,100,000 + $8,400,000 = $25,300,000.
Funding Date: June 1, 2023.
Term: 3 years.
§ 7520 Rate: 5.0% (May 2023, elected under § 7520(a)).
Annuity Payment Calculation:
The annuity for GRAT C is computed on the pre-discount fair market value of $38,000,000, consistent with the methodology described for GRAT B. Using the present value annuity factor for a 3-year term at 5.0%, adjusted for the mortality probability of a male age 67, the zeroed-out annual annuity for GRAT C is computed as follows:
Annual Annuity = $38,000,000 / Annuity Factor (3-year, 5.0%, age 67)
Annual Annuity = $13,953,759
Payment Dates: June 1, 2024 (first annuity payment); June 1, 2025 (second annuity payment); and June 1, 2026 (third and final annuity payment).
Total Annuity Payments: $13,953,759 × 3 = $41,861,277.
Taxable Gift Value: $0.
Annuity Satisfaction: The annual annuity obligation of $13,953,759 may be satisfied in kind through the distribution of LP interests, carried-interest positions, or cash distributions received by the GRAT from the underlying funds. Coordination with Caldwell Ridgeline Capital LLC (Gregory S. Fenton, CFO) will be required to address transfer restrictions, required consents under the limited partnership agreements and operating agreements, and the timing of distributions from Funds IV, V, and VI.
Special Consideration — Carried Interest. The carried-interest position in Fund VI is a "promote" interest entitling the holder to a disproportionate share of profits above specified return thresholds. Carried interest positions may generate significant and lumpy distributions upon the occurrence of realization events — such as portfolio company sales, IPOs, or recapitalizations — in Fund VI. The annuity payment structure must accommodate the timing and magnitude of such distributions. If realized carried interest distributions in any given year exceed the annuity obligation for that year, the excess remains in the GRAT and ultimately passes to the Dynasty Trust as remainder upon the expiration of the GRAT term. This dynamic is central to the transfer efficiency of GRAT C: a single large realization event in Fund VI during the three-year GRAT term could generate a substantial wealth transfer to the Dynasty Trust.
Conversely, if distributions from the underlying funds are insufficient to satisfy the annuity obligation in a given year, the trustee must distribute interests in kind (valued at fair market value) or exercise other available options to satisfy the obligation. We will work with Mr. Fenton to model the expected distribution timing from Funds IV, V, and VI and to ensure that the GRAT has adequate assets to satisfy each annual annuity payment.
E. Summary of Annuity Payments
The following table summarizes the annuity payment terms for all three Caldwell GRATs:
Each annuity payment must be made on or before the 105th day following the applicable anniversary date to be treated as timely under the Treasury Regulations. Calendaring of all payment dates, and coordination with the relevant asset custodians and fund administrators, will be critical to ongoing compliance.
V. Mortality Risk Analysis
A. Risk of Grantor's Death During the GRAT Term
The most significant risk inherent in any GRAT structure is the possibility that the grantor will die during the annuity term. Under IRC § 2036, if the grantor retains the right to income from, or the possession or enjoyment of, property transferred in trust for a period that does not in fact end before the grantor's death, the transferred property (or the portion thereof attributable to the retained interest) is includible in the grantor's gross estate. Because the grantor's retained annuity interest in a GRAT is a right to receive payments from the trust during the annuity term, the grantor's death before the expiration of the term causes inclusion of GRAT assets in the gross estate.
The amount includible in the gross estate upon the grantor's death during the GRAT term is generally determined under Treas. Reg. § 20.2036-1(c)(2) and is the portion of the GRAT corpus necessary to produce the remaining annuity payments using the § 7520 rate in effect at the date of death. In many cases, this results in inclusion of the entire GRAT corpus, particularly where the GRAT is zeroed out and the annuity payments are large relative to the corpus.
The practical effect is that if Jonathan R. Caldwell dies during the annuity term of any of the three GRATs, the wealth-transfer benefit of that GRAT is partially or fully nullified. The GRAT assets would be included in Mr. Caldwell's gross estate and would be subject to estate tax at the applicable rate (currently 40% for estates exceeding the applicable exclusion amount). The estate would, of course, receive credit for any annuity payments already made, and the net effect would depend on the timing of death within the GRAT term and the value of the GRAT assets at the date of death.
Critically, however, the mortality risk does not impose an affirmative tax cost. Because the GRATs are zeroed out, no gift tax has been paid and no gift tax exemption has been consumed. If Mr. Caldwell dies during the GRAT term, the GRAT assets are simply included in his estate as if the GRAT had never been created. The mortality risk therefore represents the loss of a wealth-transfer opportunity, not an additional tax burden.
B. Mortality Probability Assessment
Jonathan R. Caldwell was born on March 14, 1956, and is currently age 67. His age at the funding of each GRAT ranges from 67 years and 1 month (GRAT A) to 67 years and 2.5 months (GRAT C). For actuarial purposes, his age is rounded to 67 for all three GRATs.
Using the IRS Table 2000CM (the applicable mortality table under § 7520 for determining the present value of annuities and other interests), we have assessed the probability that Mr. Caldwell will survive through the term of each GRAT. The relevant probabilities, based on Table 2000CM for a male age 67, are as follows:
GRAT A (2-year term, age 67 to 69): The probability that a male age 67 will survive to age 69 under Table 2000CM is approximately 96% or higher. This represents a high survival probability and a correspondingly low mortality risk. The two-year term is among the shortest feasible GRAT terms and was selected in part to minimize mortality exposure for this GRAT.
GRAT B (3-year term, age 67 to 70): The probability that a male age 67 will survive to age 70 under Table 2000CM is approximately 93% or higher. While slightly lower than the two-year survival probability, this still represents a high probability of success and a manageable mortality risk.
GRAT C (3-year term, age 67 to 70): The mortality risk for GRAT C is the same as for GRAT B, as both have three-year terms beginning at approximately the same age. The survival probability is approximately 93% or higher.
We note that GRATs B and C overlap with GRAT A in their initial year but extend one year beyond the expiration of GRAT A. The incremental mortality risk associated with the third year is modest in absolute terms but is not negligible. Mr. Caldwell has been fully advised of the mortality risk and its consequences for each GRAT.
Mr. Caldwell reports no significant health issues at the time of funding. He does not smoke, maintains a regular exercise regimen, and has no history of cancer, heart disease, or other life-threatening conditions. His actual mortality risk may therefore be lower than the population-based estimates derived from Table 2000CM. However, the GRAT analysis must be based on the IRS actuarial tables, and no adjustment for superior health is available or appropriate.
C. Mitigation Strategies
Several strategies have been employed to mitigate the mortality risk associated with the Caldwell GRATs:
Short GRAT Terms. The two-year term for GRAT A and three-year terms for GRATs B and C represent the shortest feasible terms for these asset classes. A shorter term reduces the time during which the grantor must survive to preserve the wealth-transfer benefit. While a one-year GRAT term would further reduce mortality risk, it would also reduce the time available for GRAT assets to appreciate and would increase administrative costs relative to the potential benefit. The selected terms represent an appropriate balance between mortality risk reduction and transfer efficiency.
Caldwell Family Insurance Trust (ILIT). The Caldwell Family Insurance Trust (established in 2017) holds a $15,000,000 second-to-die universal life insurance policy issued by Beacon Life Assurance Company (Policy No. BLA-2023-77419), insuring the joint lives of Jonathan R. Caldwell and Margaret H. Caldwell. This policy provides liquidity for estate tax payment upon the death of the survivor and partially mitigates the financial impact of GRAT failure due to premature death. While the insurance proceeds do not replicate the wealth-transfer benefit of a successful GRAT, they do ensure that the Caldwell estate has adequate liquid funds to pay estate taxes without forced liquidation of illiquid assets.
Rolling GRATs. Upon the expiration of the current GRAT terms, new short-term GRATs can be created using the same or similar assets (a "rolling GRAT" strategy). This approach allows the Caldwell family to capture excess appreciation in successive two- or three-year periods while maintaining short GRAT terms that minimize mortality risk. The rolling GRAT strategy is addressed in detail in the Estate Planning Strategy Memorandum as a future recommendation.
Staggered Funding Dates. The three GRATs are funded on staggered dates — April 15, May 1, and June 1, 2023 — and have overlapping but non-identical terms. This diversification of funding dates and term structures provides a modest mitigation of mortality risk by ensuring that not all GRAT terms begin and end at the same time. If Mr. Caldwell were to die in, say, April 2025 (after the expiration of GRAT A's two-year term but before the expiration of GRATs B and C's three-year terms), GRAT A would have successfully transferred its remainder to the Dynasty Trust while GRATs B and C would be includible in the estate.
VI. Asset Selection Criteria
A. Principles of Asset Selection for GRATs
The selection of assets to fund a GRAT is one of the most consequential decisions in the GRAT planning process. The GRAT structure is most effective when funded with assets that are expected to appreciate at rates meaningfully exceeding the § 7520 hurdle rate — here, 5.0%. Assets that merely keep pace with or lag the hurdle rate will not generate a wealth transfer to the remainder beneficiary; the annuity payments will return the full corpus to the grantor, and the GRAT will have served no transfer-tax purpose.
The ideal GRAT asset exhibits one or more of the following characteristics:
High Growth Potential. Assets with the potential for significant appreciation over the GRAT term are the most effective GRAT funding vehicles. The greater the expected return in excess of the § 7520 hurdle rate, the greater the anticipated wealth transfer to the remainder beneficiary.
Low or No Current Income. For a GRAT, current income generated by the trust assets is available to satisfy annuity obligations but reduces the amount of appreciation retained in the GRAT at the end of the term. Accordingly, growth-oriented assets that generate little or no current income may be preferable to income-generating assets, all else being equal. However, this factor must be weighed against liquidity considerations — an asset that generates no income and is illiquid may make it difficult for the trustee to satisfy the annual annuity obligation.
Eligibility for Valuation discounts. Assets that are eligible for valuation discounts — such as lack-of-marketability and minority interest discounts on interests in closely held entities — effectively reduce the hurdle rate that the assets must exceed to generate a wealth transfer. This is because the annuity is calculated based on the pre-discount value (the economic value of the assets), but the gift tax value (and the effective § 7520 hurdle) is measured against the discounted value.
Volatility. Assets with volatile return profiles can be particularly effective in short-term GRATs due to the asymmetric risk profile of the structure. If the asset experiences a significant gain during the GRAT term, the excess appreciation passes to the remainder beneficiary. If the asset declines in value, the GRAT simply returns whatever remains to the grantor through annuity payments, and no wealth transfer occurs (but no gift tax has been paid). This "optionality" is enhanced by higher volatility.
B. GRAT A — Publicly Traded Securities ($60,000,000)
GRAT A is funded with $60,000,000 in publicly traded securities selected from Mr. Caldwell's $112,000,000 liquid securities portfolio managed by Havensbrook Wealth Advisors LLC (Diana R. Linden, Managing Director). The portfolio consists of a diversified mix of domestic large-cap and mid-cap equities, international equities, investment-grade and high-yield fixed-income instruments, and exchange-traded funds.
The selection rationale for publicly traded securities is as follows:
First, the diversified public portfolio has an expected long-term return of 7%–10% per annum, which exceeds the 5.0% § 7520 hurdle rate by 2%–5% per year. While public securities are less likely than private equity or real estate to generate the outsized returns that maximize GRAT efficiency, they provide a reliable expectation of moderate outperformance.
Second, publicly traded securities are highly liquid, which facilitates the satisfaction of annuity payments in cash or readily valued securities. This liquidity eliminates the valuation complexity and logistical challenges that may arise with in-kind distributions of illiquid assets.
Third, the shorter two-year term was selected for GRAT A specifically because of the liquid nature of the assets. A two-year GRAT minimizes mortality risk while still providing a reasonable time horizon for the securities to generate returns in excess of the hurdle rate.
No valuation discount is applicable to GRAT A, as publicly traded securities are valued at their market price per share or unit on the funding date and on each annuity payment date. The specific securities to be contributed to GRAT A will be selected in consultation with Diana R. Linden at Havensbrook Wealth Advisors, with an emphasis on positions with significant unrealized appreciation and growth potential.
The remaining $52,000,000 in liquid securities ($112,000,000 total – $60,000,000 contributed to GRAT A) will be retained in the Caldwell Revocable Trust or held directly by Mr. Caldwell, and will remain available for personal consumption, reinvestment, and other estate planning purposes.
C. GRAT B — Stonecrest Realty Holdings LLC Membership Interests ($80,000,000)
GRAT B is funded with membership interests in Stonecrest Realty Holdings LLC representing approximately 59.7% of the total entity. Stonecrest is a New York limited liability company managed by Robert M. Sinclair, Chief Operating Officer, with principal offices at 330 Madison Avenue, Suite 2401, New York, New York 10017. Mr. Caldwell currently owns 100% of Stonecrest.
Stonecrest holds a portfolio of 11 commercial and residential properties located in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, with an aggregate appraised fair market value of $134,000,000. The properties are a mix of commercial office, retail, mixed-use, multi-family residential, industrial, single-family investment, and vacant land, as detailed in the table below.
The selection rationale for Stonecrest membership interests is as follows:
First, commercial real estate is expected to appreciate and generate income exceeding the 5.0% § 7520 hurdle rate. The Stonecrest portfolio consists of well-located properties in strong markets with stable occupancy, and is expected to generate total returns (combining rental income, operating cash flow, and capital appreciation) in excess of the hurdle rate over the three-year GRAT term.
Second, the Stonecrest membership interests are eligible for a combined 25% lack-of-marketability and lack-of-control discount for gift tax purposes, as discussed in Section VII below. This discount effectively reduces the hurdle rate against which transfer efficiency is measured, making it easier for the GRAT to generate a wealth transfer to the remainder beneficiary.
Third, real estate interests are inherently illiquid and difficult to consume during the grantor's lifetime. They are therefore ideal for intergenerational transfer — removing them from the grantor's estate and passing them to the next generation through the Dynasty Trust preserves the wealth-generating capacity of the real estate portfolio for future generations.
A three-year term was selected for GRAT B because real estate returns are less volatile than equity or private equity returns and benefit from a slightly longer holding period to smooth short-term performance fluctuations. The three-year term also accommodates the timing and logistics of potential in-kind annuity payments, which may involve updated appraisals and membership interest assignments.
The property portfolio held by Stonecrest Realty Holdings LLC is as follows:
We note that mortgages on the Stonecrest properties are held at the entity level and are non-recourse to Mr. Caldwell personally. The contribution of Stonecrest membership interests to GRAT B does not trigger any due-on-sale or acceleration provisions under the existing mortgage documents, based on our review and the advice of real estate counsel. The existing mortgage debt is factored into the entity-level valuation and does not need to be separately addressed in the GRAT funding or annuity calculations.
D. GRAT C — Caldwell Ridgeline Capital LP Interests and Carried Interest ($38,000,000)
GRAT C is funded with limited partnership interests and carried-interest positions in private equity funds managed by Caldwell Ridgeline Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with principal offices at 280 Park Avenue, 35th Floor, New York, New York 10017 (Gregory S. Fenton, Chief Financial Officer). Mr. Caldwell retired from active management of Caldwell Ridgeline Capital in 2019 but retains passive investor positions in several of the firm's funds.
The specific interests contributed to GRAT C are:
Fund IV LP Interest (Vintage 2015). Mr. Caldwell holds a limited partnership interest in Caldwell Ridgeline Capital Fund IV, L.P. (a 2015-vintage buyout fund), with a current fair market value of $12,000,000 based on the most recent fund valuation report and the Ashford appraisal. Fund IV is in the harvest stage of its lifecycle, with several portfolio companies at or near exit. A combined 35% lack-of-marketability and minority interest discount is applied, producing a post-discount fair market value of $7,800,000.
Fund V LP Interest (Vintage 2018). Mr. Caldwell holds a limited partnership interest in Caldwell Ridgeline Capital Fund V, L.P. (a 2018-vintage growth equity fund), with a current fair market value of $14,000,000. Fund V is in the mid-to-late stage of its investment period, with significant unrealized appreciation in its portfolio companies. A combined 35% discount is applied, producing a post-discount fair market value of $9,100,000.
Fund VI Carried Interest (Vintage 2021). Mr. Caldwell holds a carried-interest position in Caldwell Ridgeline Capital Fund VI, L.P. (a 2021-vintage buyout fund). The carried interest entitles Mr. Caldwell to a share of the fund's profits above specified return hurdles and represents a significant embedded gain with substantial upside potential as the fund matures and realizes its investments. The current fair market value of the carried interest is $12,000,000. A 30% discount is applied (slightly lower than the 35% applied to the LP interests, reflecting the greater embedded value and certain control-like characteristics of the carried interest), producing a post-discount fair market value of $8,400,000.
The selection rationale for the Caldwell Ridgeline interests is as follows:
First, private equity fund interests have historically generated returns of 12%–18% net IRR, far exceeding the 5.0% § 7520 hurdle rate. Caldwell Ridgeline Capital's track record is consistent with these industry-wide returns, and the specific funds contributed to GRAT C are expected to generate returns well in excess of the hurdle.
Second, the carried-interest position in Fund VI represents a "built-in gain" asset with significant upside potential as the fund progresses through its investment period and begins to realize investments. A single large realization event could generate carried-interest distributions many times the original valuation, creating a substantial wealth transfer to the Dynasty Trust.
Third, the substantial valuation discounts available on the LP interests (35%) and carried interest (30%) effectively magnify transfer efficiency by reducing the gift tax value of the contributed assets. The annuity is computed on the pre-discount value, but the underlying assets are worth more in economic terms than the discounted value for gift tax purposes, making it easier for the GRAT to clear the hurdle.
Fourth, Mr. Caldwell retired from active management of Caldwell Ridgeline Capital in 2019, and these interests represent passive holdings that are ideal candidates for GRAT transfer. Removing these interests from Mr. Caldwell's estate and transferring them to the Dynasty Trust allows the family to capture the appreciation and distributions from these high-performing assets across multiple generations.
A three-year term was selected for GRAT C to capture anticipated realizations from Funds IV and V (which are in the harvest stage and are expected to generate significant distributions over the next two to three years) and to allow the Fund VI carried interest to appreciate during the early-to-mid fund lifecycle, when the greatest valuation increases typically occur.
The post-discount FMV computation for gift tax purposes is as follows:
LP Interests (Fund IV $12,000,000 + Fund V $14,000,000 = $26,000,000) × (1 – 0.35) = $16,900,000
Carried Interest (Fund VI $12,000,000) × (1 – 0.30) = $8,400,000
Total Post-discount FMV = $16,900,000 + $8,400,000 = $25,300,000
All discounts are supported by the independent qualified appraisal from Ashford Valuation Group LLC (Dr. Leonard K. Whitfield, ASA). A separate Valuation discount Analysis Memorandum provides detailed justification for the discount levels, including comparable Tax Court rulings, IRS guidance, and market data.
Transfer Restriction and Consent Considerations. The limited partnership agreements for Funds IV, V, and VI contain restrictions on the transfer of partnership interests, including requirements for general partner consent to any transfer. Coordination with Gregory S. Fenton (CFO of Caldwell Ridgeline Capital LLC) and the funds' outside legal counsel will be required to obtain any necessary consents and to confirm that the contribution of interests to GRAT C complies with the transfer provisions of the applicable partnership agreements. We anticipate that consents will be forthcoming given Mr. Caldwell's role as a founder and former managing partner of the firm, but we will confirm this prior to the June 1 funding date.
VII. Valuation discount Considerations
A. Role of discounts in GRAT Efficiency
Valuation discounts on contributed assets play a nuanced but important role in the overall efficiency of the GRAT structure. For a zeroed-out GRAT, the valuation discount does not directly affect the gift tax value of the transfer, because the taxable gift is zero regardless of whether discounts are applied. The discount does, however, affect two important dimensions of the planning:
First, the discount reduces the reported gift tax value of the transferred property on Form 709, which provides a defensible position against potential IRS challenge. If the IRS were to challenge the zeroed-out status of the GRAT — for example, by arguing that the contributed assets were worth more than the value reported on the gift tax return — the valuation discount serves as a buffer that supports the reported value.
Second, and more importantly for planning purposes, the discount affects the effective hurdle rate that the GRAT assets must exceed to generate a wealth transfer. The annuity is computed based on the pre-discount value of the contributed assets (because this is the value of the property actually in the trust), but the underlying economic value of those assets is the same whether or not a discount is applied. The discount effectively means that the trust holds assets with an economic value higher than the discounted gift tax value, making it easier for the trust assets to generate returns sufficient to satisfy the annuity obligation and still have excess appreciation remaining for the remainder beneficiary.
To illustrate: for GRAT B, the annuity is computed to return $80,000,000 in present value to the grantor. But the Stonecrest membership interests contributed to the GRAT have an economic value that is undiscounted by the 25% gift tax discount — their productive capacity, rental income, and appreciation potential are the same regardless of the discount applied for transfer tax purposes. The discount thus creates a structural advantage that enhances transfer efficiency.
B. Stonecrest Realty Holdings LLC — 25% Combined discount
The 25% combined discount applied to the Stonecrest membership interests reflects two categories of discount that are well established in the valuation literature and in Tax Court jurisprudence: