MEMORANDUM
PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION
FROM: Philip Hartmann, Partner, and Lisa Morrow, Associate — Calderwood & Harkness LLP
TO: David A. Whitfield, General Counsel, Fairwater Real Estate Investment Trust Naomi T. Sinclair, Chief Financial Officer, Fairwater Real Estate Investment Trust Rachel S. Donahue, Senior Vice President, Capital Markets, Fairwater Real Estate Investment Trust
DATE: August 28, 2025
RE: Review and Commentary on Clarendon Metropolitan Insurance Company Term Sheet for $240,000,000 Permanent CMBS Mortgage Loan — Sun Belt Portfolio Take-Out Financing
MATTER NO.: 1036-00001
cc: Marcus Leung, Associate, Calderwood & Harkness LLP Dennis P. Nakamura, Partner, Beacon Ridge Capital Advisors LLC
Right-click to update Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
This memorandum presents our review, analysis, and commentary on the term sheet dated August 25, 2025 (the "Term Sheet") received from Clarendon Metropolitan Insurance Company (NAIC No. 38921; 1 MetroTech Center, Brooklyn, NY 11201; contact: Garrett W. Hollister, Head of CMBS Originations) (the "Lender" or "Clarendon Metropolitan") for a $240,000,000 permanent fixed-rate CMBS mortgage loan (the "Permanent Loan" or the "Proposed Loan") intended to take out the existing senior secured bridge credit facility (the "Bridge Facility") provided by the syndicate led by Kensington National Bank, N.A. (the "Bridge Facility"). The purpose of this memorandum is to provide Fairwater Real Estate Investment Trust ("Fairwater REIT" or the "Company") and its management team with a comprehensive assessment of the Term Sheet, a comparative economic analysis against the existing Bridge Facility, identification of key negotiation points, and a recommended course of action.
Overall Assessment. The Term Sheet reflects market-standard CMBS conduit terms and, in our view, presents a compelling refinancing opportunity for the Sun Belt Portfolio. The Proposed Loan offers significant interest cost savings, substantial structural improvements, and meaningful risk reduction relative to the Bridge Facility. The transition from a floating-rate, full-recourse, short-term bridge financing to a fixed-rate, non-recourse, ten-year permanent CMBS mortgage loan is consistent with Fairwater REIT's stated capital markets strategy and will materially improve the Company's consolidated balance sheet metrics and credit profile.
Interest Cost Savings. On a purely interest-only comparative basis, the Proposed Loan at a fixed rate of 6.25% per annum generates annual interest savings of approximately $7,392,000 relative to the Bridge Facility's current all-in floating rate of 9.33% (calculated as 30-day Term SOFR of 4.33% as of August 11, 2025, plus the 500 basis point contractual spread). This differential of 308 basis points, when applied to the $240,000,000 loan principal, yields the aforementioned savings figure ($240,000,000 × 3.08% = $7,392,000). It bears noting, however, that the Proposed Loan includes a 30-year amortization schedule, whereas the Bridge Facility is structured on an interest-only basis. Accordingly, the actual annual debt service under the Proposed Loan is approximately $17,734,152 (representing combined principal and interest), compared to the annualized interest-only cost under the Bridge Facility of $22,392,000. This yields annual cash flow savings of approximately $4,657,848 ($22,392,000 − $17,734,152 = $4,657,848), even after accounting for the principal amortization component.
DSCR Improvement. Based on the trailing-twelve-month net operating income ("NOI") of $26,180,000, the debt service coverage ratio ("DSCR") improves from 1.169x under the Bridge Facility ($26,180,000 ÷ $22,392,000) to 1.476x under the Proposed Loan ($26,180,000 ÷ $17,734,152). This 30.7 basis point improvement in DSCR coverage provides significantly enhanced cushion against operating performance variability and a materially improved covenant compliance margin.
Recommendation. We recommend that Fairwater REIT accept the Term Sheet and proceed to the formal loan application phase, subject to the negotiation of the specific points identified in Section V of this memorandum. The economic benefits of the Proposed Loan are substantial and well-supported, the structural terms are generally consistent with prevailing CMBS market conventions for transactions of this size and credit quality, and the identified negotiation points are, in our experience, achievable within the scope of customary CMBS loan negotiations for institutional REIT borrowers.
Target Timeline. We propose the following target timeline for execution of the take-out financing:
• September 2, 2025: Submission of marked-up Term Sheet with borrower's proposed revisions to Clarendon Metropolitan
• September 8, 2025: Fairwater REIT Board of Trustees meeting and authorization resolution
• September 15, 2025: Submission of formal loan application, rate lock deposit ($2,400,000; reference number CL-CMBS-2025-09-0347), and supporting materials
• October 1, 2025: Target date for issuance of commitment letter by Clarendon Metropolitan
• October 15, 2025: Target date for initial loan document circulation by Ashworth McPhail LLP (Lender's counsel)
• November 14, 2025: Target date for execution of permanent loan documents
• November 28, 2025: Target closing date; simultaneous repayment of Bridge Facility to Kensington National Bank, N.A.
This timeline positions the closing well ahead of the December 31, 2025 hard maturity of the Bridge Facility, providing a buffer of approximately 33 calendar days. Furthermore, the November 28, 2025 target closing falls comfortably within the March 31, 2026 deadline for the waiver of the Bridge Facility's 0.50% exit fee ($1,200,000), preserving that cost savings for the Company.
Board Authorization. Execution of the Permanent Loan will require a formal resolution of the Fairwater REIT Board of Trustees. We understand the next regularly scheduled Board meeting is September 8, 2025. Calderwood & Harkness will prepare the necessary form of board resolution in coordination with Crestline & Alderman LLP (Patricia S. Keene, lead REIT corporate governance partner) to ensure proper authorization under the Company's Declaration of Trust, Bylaws, and the applicable provisions of Maryland REIT law.
II. Background — Existing Bridge Facility
The following section summarizes the material terms and context of the existing Bridge Facility, which the Proposed Loan is intended to replace. A thorough understanding of the Bridge Facility's terms is essential both for the comparative economic analysis presented in Section IV and for the identification of the structural improvements offered by the Proposed Loan.
A. Bridge Facility Summary
The Bridge Facility was documented pursuant to that certain Senior Secured Bridge Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2025 (the "Bridge Credit Agreement"), among Fairwater Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (EIN 52-2847201) (the "OP" or the "Bridge Borrower"), as borrower, Fairwater Real Estate Investment Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (EIN 52-2847193; NYSE: FWTR), as guarantor, Kensington National Bank, N.A. (600 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022; relationship manager Thomas J. Pagano, Managing Director, Real Estate Finance) ("KNB"), as administrative agent and lead arranger, and the lender parties thereto. Lender's counsel for the Bridge Facility was Halcourt Briggs & Devlin LLP (Kenneth R. Delacroix, lead partner).
The total commitment under the Bridge Facility is $240,000,000, which was fully funded at closing on June 30, 2025 in connection with the acquisition of the Sun Belt Portfolio. The Bridge Facility is structured on an interest-only basis with no scheduled principal amortization.
Collateral. The Bridge Facility is secured by:
(a) First-priority mortgage liens on all 14 Sun Belt Portfolio properties, recorded in the applicable county land records offices in Texas (5 properties), Georgia (3 properties), Florida (3 properties), North Carolina (2 properties), and Tennessee (1 property);
(b) A pledge of 100% of the equity interests in each of the 14 special purpose entity subsidiaries (Fairwater Sun Belt I LLC through Fairwater Sun Belt XIV LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company) (collectively, the "SPEs"), which directly hold the respective portfolio properties;
(c) An assignment of all leases and rents relating to the portfolio properties; and
(d) An assignment of all property management agreements (currently held by Fairwater Residential Management LLC, the Company's affiliated management platform, which assumed management effective July 1, 2025 following the portfolio acquisition).
B. Syndicate Composition
The Bridge Facility was syndicated among the following institutional lenders:
Kensington National Bank, N.A. serves as administrative agent and lead arranger and holds the largest pro rata share at 40.00%. The syndicate was assembled by KNB's Real Estate Finance group and closed simultaneously with the portfolio acquisition on June 30, 2025. We note that the repayment of the Bridge Facility will require coordination with each syndicate member through KNB as administrative agent, and payoff proceeds will flow through the standard administrative agent waterfall mechanics set forth in the Bridge Credit Agreement.
C. Bridge Economic Terms
The following is a summary of the key economic terms of the Bridge Facility:
Interest Rate. The Bridge Facility bears interest at a floating rate equal to the sum of 30-day Term SOFR plus 500 basis points. As of August 11, 2025, 30-day Term SOFR was 4.33%, yielding a current all-in interest rate of 9.33%. The Bridge Credit Agreement includes a SOFR floor of 3.00%, meaning that the minimum effective interest rate (absent any SOFR adjustment) would be 8.00% (3.00% floor plus 500 basis point spread), even in a declining rate environment. The default rate under the Bridge Credit Agreement is an additional 200 basis points above the otherwise applicable rate, resulting in a current default rate of 11.33% (SOFR + 700 bps).
Monthly and Annual Interest Costs. At the current all-in rate of 9.33%, the monthly interest cost on the $240,000,000 outstanding principal is approximately $1,866,000 ($240,000,000 × 9.33% ÷ 12 = $1,866,000, rounded). On an annualized basis, the total interest cost is approximately $22,392,000 ($240,000,000 × 9.33% = $22,392,000). Because the Bridge Facility is interest-only, this figure represents the entirety of the required annual debt service (i.e., there is no principal amortization component).
Origination Fee. The Bridge Facility carried an origination fee of 1.00% of the total commitment, equal to $2,400,000 ($240,000,000 × 1.00%), which was paid in full at the bridge closing on June 30, 2025. This fee has been fully expensed and is a sunk cost for purposes of the refinancing analysis.
Exit Fee. The Bridge Credit Agreement includes an exit fee of 0.50% of the outstanding principal balance at the time of repayment, equal to $1,200,000 assuming full $240,000,000 principal repayment ($240,000,000 × 0.50% = $1,200,000). Critically, this exit fee is waived if the Bridge Facility is repaid from the proceeds of permanent CMBS financing within nine (9) months of the bridge closing date (i.e., by March 31, 2026). Given our target closing date for the Permanent Loan of November 28, 2025, which falls approximately five months after the bridge closing, the exit fee waiver should be readily achievable, resulting in a savings of $1,200,000 to the Company.
Maturity. The Bridge Facility has an initial maturity date of December 31, 2025, representing a six-month initial term from the June 30, 2025 closing date.
Extension Option. The Bridge Borrower has a single six-month extension option permitting extension of the maturity date to June 30, 2026, subject to satisfaction of the following conditions: (a) no event of default exists or would result from the extension; (b) loan-to-value ("LTV") ratio does not exceed 65%; (c) DSCR is at least 1.20x; and (d) payment of an extension fee equal to 25 basis points of the outstanding principal balance ($240,000,000 × 0.25% = $600,000). We note with concern that the current portfolio DSCR of 1.169x falls below the 1.20x extension threshold, which means the extension option is not currently exercisable without either a partial principal paydown or improvement in NOI. This issue is discussed further in Section IX.C (Contingency Planning) below.
D. Bridge Financial Covenants
The Bridge Credit Agreement imposes the following ongoing financial covenants, measured at both the entity and portfolio levels:
Entity-Level Covenants (tested at the Fairwater REIT consolidated level):
(i) Consolidated Leverage Ratio: not to exceed 65%;
(ii) Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio: not less than 1.50x;
(iii) Tangible Net Worth: not less than $750,000,000; and
(iv) Minimum Liquidity: not less than $50,000,000 (unrestricted cash and cash equivalents plus available commitments under revolving credit facilities).
Portfolio-Level Covenants (tested at the Sun Belt Portfolio level):
(i) Loan-to-Value Ratio: not to exceed 65% (current: approximately 62.34%, based on the $385,000,000 aggregate appraised value at acquisition); and
(ii) Debt Service Coverage Ratio: not less than 1.10x (current: 1.169x, providing a margin of approximately 6.9 basis points above the covenant threshold).
We note that while the portfolio-level DSCR of 1.169x satisfies the 1.10x maintenance covenant, the margin is relatively thin, and the portfolio's DSCR performance should be monitored closely during the remaining term of the Bridge Facility. Any meaningful decline in NOI could bring the DSCR uncomfortably close to the covenant threshold.
E. Acquisition Context
The Sun Belt Portfolio was acquired by Fairwater Operating Partnership, L.P. from Meridian Sunstone Holdings LLC (owned 51% by Victor L. Castaneda and 49% by Brenda K. Yung) pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated March 15, 2025, with closing occurring on June 30, 2025.
Purchase Price and Portfolio Composition. The aggregate purchase price was $385,000,000 for a portfolio of 14 multifamily apartment communities comprising approximately 4,200 residential units distributed across five states in the Sun Belt region, as follows:
Operating Performance. At the time of acquisition, the weighted average occupancy across the Sun Belt Portfolio was 93.7%. The trailing-twelve-month NOI was $26,180,000, implying an acquisition capitalization rate of approximately 6.80% ($26,180,000 ÷ $385,000,000 = 6.80%). This cap rate was consistent with prevailing market conditions for institutional-quality multifamily assets in the Sun Belt region at the time of the acquisition and was supported by the independent MAI appraisals commissioned in connection with the transaction.
Funding Sources. The acquisition was funded through a combination of the following sources:
The Company's equity contribution of $145,000,000 was sourced from a combination of unrestricted cash on Fairwater REIT's balance sheet and the issuance of limited partnership units in Fairwater Operating Partnership, L.P. to certain contributors in connection with the acquisition. The relatively conservative leverage level of 62.34% of the purchase price (and appraised value) provided an appropriate cushion and positioned the portfolio favorably for a permanent CMBS take-out at similar or identical leverage levels.
III. Summary of Proposed Permanent Loan Terms (Clarendon Metropolitan Term Sheet)
The following section provides a detailed summary of the material terms set forth in the Term Sheet. Where applicable, we have included our preliminary commentary and identified terms that are subject to further negotiation or clarification. A comprehensive discussion of our recommended negotiation positions follows in Section V.
A. Loan Amount and Structure
Proposed Loan Amount. The Term Sheet contemplates a permanent mortgage loan in the principal amount of $240,000,000, representing a full take-out of the existing Bridge Facility at par. No new money is being advanced; the Proposed Loan is a dollar-for-dollar refinancing of the existing bridge indebtedness.
Lender. The Lender is Clarendon Metropolitan Insurance Company, a New York domiciled insurance company (NAIC No. 38921) with its principal office at 1 MetroTech Center, Brooklyn, New York 11201. The Company's primary contact at Clarendon Metropolitan is Garrett W. Hollister, Head of CMBS Originations.
Lender's Counsel. Clarendon Metropolitan has engaged Ashworth McPhail LLP as its counsel for the Proposed Loan. The lead partner is Joanna C. Wexler, with offices at 51 Madison Avenue, 24th Floor, New York, New York 10010. Ashworth McPhail is a well-regarded CMBS lending practice, and we have worked with their team on prior transactions. We anticipate a constructive but rigorous negotiation process.
CMBS Conduit Structure. The Proposed Loan will be originated by Clarendon Metropolitan as a CMBS conduit origination. Following origination and closing, the loan is anticipated to be securitized and deposited into a CMBS trust. The indicative securitization designation is CLRN 2025-C14, though this is subject to final pooling and securitization timing. The CMBS conduit structure has important implications for borrower interaction post-closing, as discussed in Section VI.B below.
Borrower. The Term Sheet contemplates that the 14 SPEs — Fairwater Sun Belt I LLC through Fairwater Sun Belt XIV LLC — will serve as co-borrowers under the Proposed Loan. This represents a structural shift from the Bridge Facility, under which Fairwater Operating Partnership, L.P. was the sole borrower. The transition to SPE-level co-borrowers is a standard CMBS structural requirement designed to achieve bankruptcy remoteness at the property-owning entity level, which is essential for rating agency assessment of the securitization. The co-borrower structure is discussed further in Section VI.A.
Guarantor. Fairwater Real Estate Investment Trust will serve as the non-recourse carve-out guarantor under the Proposed Loan. This is a materially reduced guaranty obligation compared to the full-recourse guaranty provided by Fairwater REIT under the Bridge Facility. The scope of the carve-out guaranty is discussed in Sections III.D and V.B.
B. Interest Rate and Payment Terms
Fixed Interest Rate. The Proposed Loan will bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.25% per annum for the full ten-year term. The conversion from a floating SOFR-based rate under the Bridge Facility to a fixed rate under the Proposed Loan eliminates the Company's exposure to SOFR fluctuations and provides certainty of interest cost over the life of the loan. As of the date of this memorandum, the 6.25% fixed rate represents a 308 basis point savings relative to the current all-in bridge rate of 9.33%.
Term. The Proposed Loan has a term of 10 years, with an anticipated closing in November 2025 and a corresponding maturity date in November 2035. The precise maturity date will be determined at closing based on the actual funding date.
Amortization. The Proposed Loan will amortize on a 30-year schedule, meaning that monthly payments of principal and interest will be calculated based on a hypothetical 30-year repayment period, with the remaining outstanding principal balance due in a balloon payment at maturity in November 2035. This is a standard CMBS amortization structure.
Monthly Payment. Based on a $240,000,000 principal balance, a 6.25% fixed interest rate, and a 30-year amortization schedule, the estimated monthly principal and interest payment is approximately $1,477,846. This figure is subject to adjustment based on the final closing date and the actual day-count convention applied.
Annual Debt Service. The total annual debt service under the Proposed Loan is approximately $17,734,152 ($1,477,846 × 12 = $17,734,152), which includes both interest and scheduled principal amortization. This compares favorably to the annualized interest-only debt service of $22,392,000 under the Bridge Facility, a difference of approximately $4,657,848 per annum.
Payment Basis. The Term Sheet does not specify the day-count convention. We have assumed a 30/360 basis for purposes of this analysis, which is standard for fixed-rate CMBS mortgage loans. This should be confirmed with Clarendon Metropolitan during the application process.
C. Loan-to-Value and Debt Service Coverage
Loan-to-Value Ratio. Based on the $240,000,000 loan amount and the aggregate appraised value of $385,000,000 established at the time of the portfolio acquisition, the LTV ratio is approximately 62.34% ($240,000,000 ÷ $385,000,000 = 62.34%). This is within the range typically required by CMBS conduit lenders, which generally target maximum LTV ratios of 65% to 75% depending on asset class, location, and borrower credit quality. We note that Clarendon Metropolitan may require updated MAI appraisals, and the LTV ratio may be adjusted based on revised appraised values. Given the trajectory of multifamily property values in the Sun Belt region, we do not anticipate a material decline in appraised value, but this should be monitored.
Debt Service Coverage Ratio. Based on the trailing-twelve-month NOI of $26,180,000 and the projected annual debt service of $17,734,152, the DSCR under the Proposed Loan is approximately 1.476x ($26,180,000 ÷ $17,734,152 = 1.476x). This represents a significant improvement over the current bridge DSCR of 1.169x and is well above the typical CMBS underwriting threshold of 1.25x for multifamily assets. The robust DSCR should support the Company's negotiating position on several key terms, including the lockbox structure and reserve requirements.
D. Recourse / Non-Recourse Structure
Non-Recourse Loan. The Proposed Loan is structured as a non-recourse mortgage loan, meaning that the Lender's recovery in the event of a default is limited to the value of the collateral properties and any escrowed or reserved funds. This is a fundamental structural improvement over the Bridge Facility, which is a full-recourse obligation of both the Bridge Borrower and Fairwater REIT as guarantor.
Carve-Out Guaranty. Consistent with standard CMBS practice, the non-recourse structure is subject to certain exceptions (commonly known as "bad boy" carve-outs) for which Fairwater REIT, as the non-recourse carve-out guarantor, will bear personal liability. The Term Sheet references "standard CMBS carve-outs" and identifies the following categories:
(a) Fraud or intentional misrepresentation by borrower or guarantor;
(b) Voluntary bankruptcy filing by the borrower (or any SPE co-borrower);
(c) Misapplication of rents, revenues, insurance proceeds, or condemnation proceeds;
(d) Environmental liability arising from the collateral properties;
(e) Violation of the SPE separateness covenants set forth in the loan documents.
Full Recourse Triggers. In addition to the loss-based carve-outs enumerated above, the Term Sheet indicates that the following events will trigger a conversion of the entire loan balance to full recourse against the guarantor: (i) voluntary bankruptcy filing by the borrower (or any SPE co-borrower); and (ii) a collusive involuntary bankruptcy filing. This is the most significant risk allocation provision in the guaranty, and its scope should be the subject of careful negotiation, as discussed in Section V.B.
E. Collateral
The collateral package for the Proposed Loan mirrors that of the Bridge Facility and includes:
(a) First-priority mortgage liens on all 14 Sun Belt Portfolio properties, recorded in the applicable county land records offices across the five states;
(b) A pledge of 100% of the equity interests in each of the 14 SPE co-borrowers;
(c) An assignment of all leases and rents relating to the collateral properties;
(d) An assignment of all property management agreements (currently with Fairwater Residential Management LLC);
(e) UCC fixture filings in each applicable county where the collateral properties are located; and
(f) UCC equity pledge filings in the State of Delaware (the jurisdiction of organization of each of the 14 SPEs).
The transition from the Bridge Facility to the Proposed Loan will involve satisfaction and release of the existing Bridge Facility liens and their replacement with new liens in favor of Clarendon Metropolitan (or the CMBS trust, as applicable). This process requires close coordination between Calderwood & Harkness, Ashworth McPhail LLP, Halcourt Briggs & Devlin LLP, and the title company (Marlowe Asset Management Title Insurance Group, Inc.) to ensure seamless gap-free lien perfection.
F. Prepayment / Defeasance
Lockout Period. The Term Sheet imposes a two-year lockout period during which no prepayment of the Proposed Loan is permitted. Based on an assumed closing date of November 2025, the lockout period would extend through approximately November 2027.
Defeasance. Following the expiration of the lockout period, the borrower may defease the Proposed Loan through the standard CMBS defeasance mechanism. Under this mechanism, the borrower substitutes a portfolio of U.S. government obligations (typically U.S. Treasury securities) that replicate the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest under the loan, and the collateral properties are released from the mortgage liens. Defeasance is permitted from the end of the lockout period through the date that is 90 days before the maturity date. The mechanics of defeasance are discussed further in Section V.H.
Open Prepayment Period. During the final 90 days before maturity (approximately August through November 2035), the borrower may prepay the Proposed Loan in full without premium or penalty. This open prepayment window is standard for CMBS conduit loans and provides flexibility for refinancing at or near maturity.
G. Fees
Origination Fee. The Term Sheet specifies an origination fee of 0.75% of the proposed loan amount, equal to $1,800,000 ($240,000,000 × 0.75%). This fee is payable at closing. We note that this is 25 basis points lower than the origination fee paid on the Bridge Facility (1.00% = $2,400,000), reflecting the relatively lower transaction costs associated with permanent CMBS financing as compared to syndicated bridge lending. The 0.75% origination fee is within the market range for CMBS conduit loans of this size, which typically range from 0.50% to 1.00%.
Rate Lock Deposit. The Term Sheet requires submission of a rate lock deposit of $2,400,000, representing 1.00% of the proposed loan amount ($240,000,000 × 1.00%). The rate lock deposit is referenced under Clarendon Metropolitan's internal tracking number CL-CMBS-2025-09-0347. Per the Term Sheet, the rate lock deposit is refundable at closing and will be applied as a credit against closing costs. We will prepare a rate lock deposit side letter to formalize the terms of the deposit, including the conditions under which the deposit is refundable in the event the loan does not close and the mechanics of the credit against closing costs.
Application Fee. The Term Sheet indicates that the application fee structure is to be confirmed. For CMBS conduit loans of this size ($240,000,000), the application fee is typically absorbed within the origination fee rather than assessed separately. We will seek confirmation from Clarendon Metropolitan that no separate application fee will be charged.
H. Cash Management
The Term Sheet provides for "lockbox and cash management arrangements" but does not specify the type of lockbox structure (i.e., hard lockbox versus springing lockbox). This ambiguity is significant and has been flagged as a key negotiation point, as discussed in detail in Section V.A. The type of cash management structure will have a direct impact on the Company's ability to manage property-level cash flows and, critically, to distribute funds to Fairwater Operating Partnership, L.P. and ultimately to Fairwater REIT for satisfaction of the REIT distribution requirement.
I. Reserves
The Term Sheet requires the following reserve arrangements:
Tax and Insurance Escrows. Monthly escrow deposits for real property taxes and insurance premiums are required. This is standard for all CMBS conduit loans and is non-negotiable. The amounts will be determined based on the applicable tax and insurance obligations for each of the 14 properties.
Capital Expenditure Reserve. The Term Sheet indicates a capital expenditure (or replacement) reserve of $250 per unit per annum. Based on the approximately 4,200 units in the Sun Belt Portfolio, this equates to an annual capital expenditure reserve contribution of approximately $1,050,000 ($250 × 4,200 = $1,050,000). This reserve amount and its structure (monthly contributions versus annual funding, springing versus ongoing) are subjects for negotiation, as discussed in Section V.F.
Replacement Reserve / Leasing Commission Reserve. The Term Sheet references replacement reserve and leasing commission reserve requirements, the specific terms of which are to be negotiated. Given the multifamily nature of the portfolio, we believe the replacement reserve is likely to be incorporated into the capital expenditure reserve, and we will push to eliminate or minimize any separate leasing commission reserve, as multifamily leasing costs are typically modest relative to commercial office or retail leasing.
Upfront Reserve Deposits at Closing. The Term Sheet contemplates upfront reserve deposits at closing to pre-fund the tax and insurance escrow accounts (based on pro-rated amounts) and to establish the initial capital expenditure reserve. We will negotiate to minimize these initial cash outlays and to credit the borrower for any taxes and insurance premiums already prepaid for the current period.
J. SPE Requirements
Consistent with standard CMBS practice, the Term Sheet requires that each SPE co-borrower comply with customary separateness covenants designed to ensure the bankruptcy remoteness of the borrower entities. The principal SPE requirements include:
(a) Independent Director/Manager Requirement. Each SPE co-borrower must have at least one independent director (or independent manager, given the LLC structure) whose affirmative consent is required before the entity may file a voluntary petition for bankruptcy or insolvency relief. This requirement is fundamental to the CMBS structure and is not negotiable in substance, though certain aspects of its implementation are negotiable, as discussed in Section V.C.
(b) Restrictions on Additional Indebtedness. The SPE co-borrowers will be restricted from incurring any additional indebtedness without the Lender's consent. This is standard for CMBS borrower entities.
(c) Dissolution, Merger, and Asset Transfer Restrictions. The SPE co-borrowers will be restricted from dissolving, merging, consolidating, or transferring substantially all of their assets without Lender consent.
(d) Single-Purpose Entity Representations. The loan agreement will include detailed representations and warranties regarding the single-purpose nature of each SPE co-borrower, including representations regarding organizational separateness, avoidance of commingling of funds and assets, maintenance of separate books and records, and other standard CMBS SPE representations.
K. Transfer Restrictions
The Term Sheet imposes standard CMBS transfer restrictions that prohibit the transfer of the collateral properties and the equity interests in the SPE co-borrowers without the Lender's prior written consent. The Term Sheet references "standard CMBS exceptions" but defers the specifics of any permitted transfers to the loan documentation process. We have identified the transfer restrictions as a critical negotiation area, particularly in light of Fairwater REIT's publicly traded REIT structure, and our recommended negotiation positions are set forth in Section V.D.
L. Reporting Requirements
The Term Sheet requires the following reporting deliverables:
(a) Annual Audited Financial Statements. Fairwater REIT's annual audited consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP and audited by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Whitmore Hargrove & Co., P.C. (Christine M. Rowley, Lead Engagement Partner).
(b) Quarterly Unaudited Financial Statements. Quarterly unaudited consolidated financial statements of Fairwater REIT, including balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.
(c) Monthly Property Operating Statements and Rent Rolls. Property-level operating statements and current rent rolls for each of the 14 Sun Belt Portfolio properties, delivered on a monthly basis.
(d) Annual Property Budget. An annual operating budget for each of the 14 properties, typically due prior to the commencement of each calendar year.
(e) Compliance Certificates. Periodic officer's certificates attesting to compliance with loan covenants and the absence of defaults.
The specific delivery timelines and formatting requirements for these reporting obligations are subjects for negotiation, as discussed in Section V.I.
M. Conditions Precedent to Closing
The Term Sheet identifies the following conditions precedent to closing of the Proposed Loan:
(a) MAI Appraisals. Satisfactory MAI appraisals for all 14 properties, to be prepared by Thornfield Appraisal Group LLC (3100 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 600, Atlanta, GA 30339). The appraisals must confirm an aggregate appraised value sufficient to support the requested LTV ratio. As discussed in Section VIII, the acquisition-date appraisals may need to be updated or refreshed.
(b) Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. Phase I environmental site assessments for all 14 properties, and Phase II assessments if warranted based on the Phase I findings. We discuss the usability of the acquisition-date Phase I reports in Section VIII.
(c) Property Condition Reports. Physical condition assessments for all 14 properties, identifying deferred maintenance, remaining useful life of building systems, and recommended capital expenditure reserves.
(d) Seismic Reports. Seismic risk assessments, if applicable. Given the geographic location of the portfolio, this requirement is primarily relevant to the three Florida properties, and the scope of any required seismic analysis should be clarified with Clarendon Metropolitan.
(e) ALTA/NSPS Surveys. Current ALTA/NSPS land title surveys for all 14 properties. These may be new surveys or updates to the acquisition-date surveys, depending on Clarendon Metropolitan's requirements and the age of the existing surveys.
(f) Title Insurance. Lender's title insurance policies from Marlowe Asset Management Title Insurance Group, Inc. (901 Main Street, Suite 1100, Dallas, TX 75202) in the aggregate amount of $240,000,000, with allocated coverage amounts per property. The policies must include standard CMBS endorsements, as discussed in Section VII.
(g) Organizational Documents. Organizational documents for each SPE co-borrower, including amendments to implement the required SPE separateness covenants and independent manager provisions.
(h) Legal Opinions. Customary legal opinions to be delivered by Calderwood & Harkness LLP (and local counsel in each applicable state), including opinions regarding due authorization, enforceability, non-contravention, and SPE status.
(i) Insurance Certificates. Evidence of satisfactory property and casualty insurance, general liability insurance, and such other insurance coverages as may be required by the Lender and its counsel.
(j) Estoppel Certificates. Estoppel certificates from tenants at each property (threshold to be negotiated). Given the multifamily nature of the portfolio with approximately 4,200 residential units, the estoppel threshold is a significant logistical and negotiation point, as discussed in Section V.J.
(k) SNDA Agreements. Subordination, non-disturbance, and attornment agreements from tenants at each property (threshold to be negotiated), as discussed in Section V.J.
(l) No Material Adverse Change. Confirmation that no material adverse change has occurred with respect to the borrower, guarantor, or the collateral properties since the date of the loan application.
(m) Property Management Agreement Review. Lender's satisfactory review and approval of all property management agreements with Fairwater Residential Management LLC, which became effective July 1, 2025 following the portfolio acquisition.
N. Governing Law
The Term Sheet specifies that the Proposed Loan will be governed by the laws of the State of New York. This is standard for CMBS conduit loans originated by New York-domiciled lenders. The individual mortgage instruments for each property will be governed by the laws of the state in which the respective property is located (Texas, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, or Tennessee).
IV. Comparative Economic Analysis — Bridge vs. Permanent Loan
This section presents a detailed side-by-side comparison of the economic terms of the Bridge Facility and the Proposed Loan to quantify the financial benefits of the proposed refinancing.
A. Interest Rate Comparison
The most significant economic benefit of the Proposed Loan is the reduction in interest cost achieved by transitioning from the Bridge Facility's floating rate to the Proposed Loan's fixed rate:
Rate Differential. The Proposed Loan's fixed rate of 6.25% is 308 basis points lower than the Bridge Facility's current all-in rate of 9.33%. While it is true that the bridge rate could decline if SOFR declines, the current forward SOFR curve suggests that any near-term decline would be modest, and the certainty of a fixed rate for a ten-year period provides substantial hedging value that cannot be replicated through the floating-rate bridge structure.
Annual Interest Savings. On a pure interest-only comparison (holding loan amount constant at $240,000,000 and comparing only the interest components), the annual interest savings are approximately $7,392,000:
$240,000,000 × 3.08% = $7,392,000 per annum
This figure represents the gross interest savings before accounting for the impact of principal amortization under the Proposed Loan. Because the Bridge Facility is interest-only while the Proposed Loan includes 30-year amortization, the total debt service comparison yields a different (but still highly favorable) result, as discussed below.
B. DSCR Comparison
The improvement in DSCR from 1.169x to 1.476x — a gain of approximately 30.7 basis points of coverage — is significant for several reasons. First, it provides substantially greater cushion against potential declines in NOI, whether from vacancy increases, rent concessions, or unexpected operating cost increases. Second, it materially improves the Company's compliance margin relative to the financial covenants that will be embedded in the Proposed Loan documentation. Third, it supports the Company's overall credit profile and ability to access additional capital markets financing for future acquisitions.
It is worth emphasizing that the lower total annual debt service under the Proposed Loan ($17,734,152) compared to the Bridge Facility ($22,392,000) is achieved despite the inclusion of principal amortization, which reflects the substantial impact of the 308 basis point rate reduction. The annual cash flow savings of approximately $4,657,848 ($22,392,000 − $17,734,152) will be available to the Company for distributions, capital expenditures, and other corporate purposes.
C. Recourse Comparison
The transition from a full-recourse to a non-recourse loan structure represents one of the most significant structural improvements offered by the Proposed Loan. Under the Bridge Facility, Fairwater REIT's guaranty obligation exposes the Company to personal liability for the entire $240,000,000 loan amount (plus accrued interest, costs, and expenses) in the event of a borrower default. Under the Proposed Loan, the Lender's recovery is limited to the collateral properties (and related security), except in the case of the enumerated carve-out exceptions. The carve-out exceptions are narrowly defined and relate to conduct within the borrower's control (fraud, voluntary bankruptcy, misapplication of proceeds), environmental conditions at the properties, and compliance with SPE separateness covenants. While these carve-outs should be the subject of careful negotiation (as discussed in Section V.B), the overall risk profile of the guaranty obligation under the Proposed Loan is dramatically reduced compared to the Bridge Facility.
D. Term and Maturity Comparison
The extension of the loan term from six months to ten years eliminates the near-term refinancing risk inherent in the Bridge Facility. Under the current bridge structure, the Company faces a hard maturity on December 31, 2025 — approximately four months from the date of this memorandum — with only a conditional six-month extension option. The extension option itself is subject to conditions (including a DSCR test at 1.20x) that may be difficult to satisfy, as discussed in Section IX.C. The Proposed Loan replaces this precarious maturity profile with a stable, ten-year fixed-rate term that aligns with the Company's long-term hold strategy for the Sun Belt Portfolio.
E. Fee Comparison and Transaction Costs
The following table summarizes the fees and transaction costs associated with each financing:
Additional Closing Costs (Proposed Permanent Loan). In addition to the origination fee, the Company should anticipate the following closing costs in connection with the Proposed Loan:
(a) Mortgage recording fees and transfer taxes in five states (Texas, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, and Tennessee). The recording fees and taxes vary significantly by jurisdiction and will depend on whether the applicable jurisdiction provides a credit for existing recorded liens or imposes full recording tax on the new mortgage amount. Local counsel in each state will provide detailed estimates.
(b) Title insurance premiums payable to Marlowe Asset Management Title Insurance Group, Inc. for lender's title insurance policies aggregating $240,000,000. CMBS title insurance premiums are typically negotiable at this scale, and simultaneous issue credits may be available in certain jurisdictions where the Company also obtains or renews owner's title policies.
(c) Appraisal fees payable to Thornfield Appraisal Group LLC for MAI appraisals of all 14 properties (whether new appraisals or updates to existing appraisals).
(d) Legal fees payable to Calderwood & Harkness LLP (borrower's counsel), Ashworth McPhail LLP (lender's counsel — typically paid by borrower in CMBS transactions), and local counsel in each of the five states for mortgage recording, local law opinions, and related matters.
(e) UCC filing fees for fixture filings (county level, five states) and equity pledge filings (Delaware Secretary of State).
(f) Environmental, property condition, and survey report costs (to the extent new reports or updates are required).
We will prepare a detailed closing cost estimate for management's review following confirmation of the specific third-party report requirements and recording tax obligations in each jurisdiction.
F. Summary Table — Key Economic Terms
The following table provides a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of the key economic terms of the Bridge Facility and the Proposed Permanent Loan:
V. Key Negotiation Points
Based on our review of the Term Sheet and our experience with comparable CMBS conduit transactions, we have identified the following key negotiation points for discussion with Clarendon Metropolitan and its counsel, Ashworth McPhail LLP. These points are presented in order of priority, as assessed by our team.
A. Cash Management — Hard vs. Springing Lockbox
Issue. The Term Sheet provides for "lockbox and cash management arrangements" but does not specify whether the lockbox structure will be a hard lockbox (with in-place cash management from day one) or a springing lockbox (triggered only upon the occurrence of a Cash Management Period). This distinction is of critical importance to the Company's ability to manage property-level cash flows and to comply with its REIT distribution requirements.
Background. In a hard lockbox structure, all tenant rents and other property revenues are deposited directly into a lockbox account controlled by the Lender (or its servicer), and the Lender directs the application of funds to debt service, reserves, operating expenses, and distributions in accordance with a pre-established cash management waterfall. The borrower has no independent control over the flow of funds. In a springing lockbox structure, by contrast, tenant rents are initially deposited into a borrower-controlled account (or a lockbox account with borrower-directed disbursement), and the Lender's cash management controls "spring" into effect only upon the occurrence of a specified triggering event — typically a decline in DSCR below a defined threshold or the occurrence of an event of default. The springing lockbox reverts to borrower-directed cash management when the triggering event is cured (e.g., when DSCR returns above the trigger level for a specified period).
CMBS Market Context. CMBS conduit lenders typically prefer hard lockbox structures, as they provide greater certainty of cash flow control and are viewed favorably by rating agencies in the securitization process. However, springing lockbox structures are readily achievable in the current CMBS market for borrowers with strong credit profiles, stable property performance, and robust DSCR coverage. Given Fairwater REIT's institutional quality, publicly traded status (NYSE: FWTR), and the portfolio's strong DSCR of 1.476x, we believe the Company has a strong basis for negotiating a springing lockbox structure.
Recommendation. We recommend negotiating for a springing lockbox structure with the following key features:
(a) DSCR Trigger Level. Cash management controls spring into effect upon the DSCR for the portfolio falling below 1.15x or 1.20x (we will push for 1.15x, with the understanding that 1.20x may be the compromise position). The trigger should be based on a trailing twelve-month DSCR calculation, not a single-quarter measurement, to avoid temporary or seasonal triggers.
(b) Cure Mechanism. The Cash Management Period should terminate, and borrower-directed cash management should be restored, upon the DSCR returning above the trigger level for two consecutive calendar quarters (or such shorter period as may be negotiated).
(c) Event of Default Trigger. A Cash Management Period should also be triggered by the occurrence and continuance of an event of default under the loan documents. This is standard and non-negotiable.
(d) Borrower-Directed Disbursement Outside Cash Management Period. Outside of a Cash Management Period, all property revenues should be disbursed to the borrower after satisfaction of monthly debt service payments and required reserve contributions.
REIT Distribution Rationale. The Company's REIT status imposes a legal requirement to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to shareholders on an annual basis. A hard lockbox structure that restricts the flow of funds from the SPE co-borrowers to Fairwater Operating Partnership, L.P. and ultimately to Fairwater REIT could interfere with the Company's ability to satisfy this distribution requirement, potentially jeopardizing its REIT qualification. This is a compelling argument for the springing lockbox structure and should be raised prominently in negotiations with Clarendon Metropolitan.
B. Scope of Non-Recourse Carve-Outs (Guaranty)
Issue. The Term Sheet references "standard CMBS carve-outs" without providing the specific language or scope of the carve-out exceptions. The non-recourse carve-out guaranty is one of the most heavily negotiated provisions in any CMBS loan transaction, and the specific language of the carve-outs can significantly affect the guarantor's exposure.
Negotiation Areas. We recommend the following positions on the principal carve-out issues:
1. Springing Full Recourse Triggers. The Term Sheet identifies voluntary bankruptcy filing and collusive involuntary bankruptcy as "full recourse" triggers — meaning that the occurrence of either event converts the entire outstanding loan balance into a full recourse obligation of the guarantor. We recommend:
(a) Confirming that the full recourse triggers are limited to voluntary bankruptcy filing by the borrower (or any SPE co-borrower) and collusive involuntary bankruptcy, and resisting any expansion of the full recourse trigger list to include unauthorized transfers, SPE covenant violations, or other events. These latter categories should be treated as loss-based carve-outs (guarantor liability limited to actual loss) rather than full-recourse triggers.
(b) Defining "collusive involuntary bankruptcy" narrowly to require actual borrower participation or encouragement of the involuntary filing.
(c) Adding a carve-out for involuntary bankruptcy filings that are dismissed within 90 days and with respect to which the borrower took no affirmative action to encourage or participate.
2. Fraud / Intentional Misrepresentation. We recommend:
(a) Limiting the fraud carve-out to "actual fraud" and resisting the inclusion of "constructive fraud" or "negligent misrepresentation," which are significantly broader concepts that could expose the guarantor to liability for good-faith errors or omissions in representations and warranties.
(b) Adding a knowledge qualifier — i.e., liability arises only for misrepresentations made with actual knowledge of their falsity or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity.
3. Misapplication of Rents and Insurance/Condemnation Proceeds. We recommend:
(a) Defining "misapplication" to exclude the ordinary-course application of rents to property operating expenses, even if such expenses were not specifically approved in an annual budget or operating expense category.