FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / analysis-vantor-rfa-responses.docx
analysis-vantor-rfa-responses.docx · 1012-00005

Parties

Harkness LLP
Vantor Holdings Corp
Defendant Stonefield Logistics Group Inc
Stonefield Logistics Group Inc
Vantor Transport Services LLC
Shapiro LLP
Ashford Meridian LLP

Dates

May 10, 2023
March 6, 2023
April 14, 2023
May 8, 2023
March 15, 2019
January 18, 2022
February 17, 2022
March 4, 2022
December 15, 2022
April 1, 2019

Amounts

$387,400
$11.4
$21.6
$43.2
$31.8
$10.2

Obligations

Under FRCP 36(a)(4), a denial must "fairly respond to the substance of the matter," and a responding party that "cannot truthfully admit or deny" a matter must "state in detail why" it cannot do so
The "substantial compliance" formulation Vantor employs has no basis in the TSA, which defines the SLOs as minimum thresholds (using "shall achieve" and "not less than" language) rather than aspirational targets
1(a) specifies that the breaching party shall have "thirty (30) calendar days following receipt of the Cure Notice" to effect cure
To sustain its termination for Cause, Stonefield must establish that VTS failed to cure the identified material breaches within this window
3, requires that any party receiving a force majeure notice "shall notify the invoking party in writing within fifteen (15) business days if it disputes the applicability of the force majeure event
Under FRCP 36(a)(4), a denial must address the substance of the matter