Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / ows-responses-lumos-interrogatories.docx
ows-responses-lumos-interrogatories.docx
Parties
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SA
STATEMENT Plaintiff Optiwave Semiconductor Corp
Harkness LLP
Optiwave Semiconductor Corp
Nordlicht Photonische GmbH
Apex Claim Analytics LLC
See Georgia-Pacific Corp
Plywood Corp
Dates
November 7, 2022
January 30, 2023
September 12, 2022
October 3, 2022
September 19, 2022
June 3, 2022
August 19, 2022
September 6, 2016
August 2, 2017
November 15, 2018
Amounts
$75
$148.6
$62.3
$1,200
$1,800
$600
$900
$11.145
$215
$42.8
Obligations
Nothing in these Responses and Objections shall be deemed an admission of the relevance, materiality, or admissibility of any information provided herein
No response herein shall be construed as an admission or concession regarding any matter of law or fact, nor shall any response be construed as a waiver of any objection, right, or privilege
OWS has endeavored to identify and withhold or redact privileged material, and no response herein shall be deemed a waiver of any applicable privilege or protection
The failure to restate a particular General Objection in response to a specific Interrogatory shall not constitute a waiver of that objection
DEFINITIONS For purposes of these Responses and Objections, the following defined terms shall have the meanings set forth below: "Patents-in-Suit" refers collectively to: (a) U
" OWS seeks compensatory damages for Defendant's infringement of the Patents-in-Suit in an amount that shall not be less than a reasonable royalty for Defendant's unauthorized use of OWS's patented technology