FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / pre-suit-infringement-analysis-234-patent.docx
pre-suit-infringement-analysis-234-patent.docx · 1014-00003

Parties

HARKNESS LLP
Optiwave Semiconductor Corp
Nordlicht Photonische GmbH
AWH Corp
Dunmore Corp
Brunswick Corp

Dates

April 25, 2022
September 8, 2017
September 8, 2037
June 12, 2020
June 15, 2020
August 3, 2020
August 2, 2017
June 3, 2022

Amounts

$1,200
$1,800
$600
$900
$1.87

Obligations

While each element must be independently mapped to the Accused Products, the infringement dispute will center on element (b)
Under the narrow construction, literal infringement of Claim 1 fails, and the analysis must proceed to the doctrine of equivalents as a fallback theory
" This reality must be central to our litigation strategy, Markman preparation, and settlement calculus
Claim 5 adds a limitation regarding threading dislocation density: the graded buffer layer must achieve a threading dislocation density of less than 1 x 10^6 cm^-2 in the germanium absorber layer
However, Lumos's own published data confirms that its step-graded buffers achieve dislocation densities within the claimed range, and the claim does not specify that the dislocation density must be achieved by a particular grading technique — only that the "graded buffer layer achieves" the stated density