FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / phe-analysis-015-patent.docx
phe-analysis-015-patent.docx · 1014-00004

Parties

Festo Corp
Optiwave Semiconductor Corp
In Ridgeway Corp
Hamilton Sundstrand Corp
ARB Corp
In Evolved Wireless LLC

Dates

September 17, 2015
April 7, 2017
August 30, 2019
September 16, 2024
October 28, 2024
March 14, 2025
November 15, 2024
December 20, 2024
March 17, 2020
April 2, 2013

Amounts

$128.4
$41.7

Obligations

Because the claim limitation was narrowed by amendment during prosecution, however, the Festo presumption of surrender applies, and OWS must rebut that presumption by establishing one of three recognized exceptions
Under this scenario, the PHE analysis for Claim 12 proceeds as outlined in this memorandum — OWS must rebut the Festo presumption for the specific "two-dimensional" limitation
The patentee must make a "persuasive showing" that one of the three exceptions applies
However, where the rebuttal depends on disputed factual issues (such as whether the accused equivalent was foreseeable or whether the prosecution attorney's intent was narrowly directed), those factual disputes may preclude summary judgment and must be resolved by the finder of fact
Strategy Note: The claim construction briefing (OWS's Opening Brief filed November 15, 2024; Reply Brief due December 20, 2024) must be coordinated with this PHE analysis