Extract to table

The Court emphasized, however, that this inquiry is "a flexible one" and that the focus "must be solely on principles and methodology, not on the conclusions that they generate

The Federal Circuit has consistently held that where the SSPPU is used as the royalty base, no further apportionment of the royalty base is required, though the royalty rate must reflect the value of the patented features relative to the product as a whole

The Uniloc decision does not stand for the proposition that a damages expert must always apportion the royalty base below the level of the SSPPU; it stands for the proposition that the expert must provide a factual basis for the royalty base and rate selected, rather than relying on arbitrary rules of thumb