Extract to table

In evaluating a motion for summary judgment, the court must construe all facts and draw all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party

An equivalent must be assessed "in the context of the patent, the prior art, and the particular circumstances of the case

But that burden is a burden of production and persuasion to the factfinder, not a threshold showing that must be made to a court before the question can reach the jury

Where the evidence regarding that relationship is disputed or susceptible to reasonable competing inferences, summary judgment is improper, and the question must be submitted to the factfinder

Rajesh Sundaram, those opinions create a classic "battle of experts" that is the paradigmatic example of a factual dispute that must be resolved by the jury, not by the Court on a motion for summary judgment

This is a "battle of experts" that must be resolved by the jury, not by the Court on summary judgment