FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / rebuttal-outline-ashford.docx
rebuttal-outline-ashford.docx · 1014-00004

Parties

Harkness LLP
Optiwave Semiconductor Corp
Cruz LLP
Sundial Corp
See Kestrel Partners LLC
See Tokai Corp
Whitfield LLP
OWS-NovaWave Corp

Dates

July 15, 2025
October 14, 2024
August 12, 2024
June 15, 2025
November 1, 2024
November 3, 2024
November 5, 2024
November 7, 2024
November 15, 2024
December 20, 2024

Amounts

$310
$487.3

Obligations

Ashford's rebuttal report must be completed, reviewed, finalized, and served on opposing counsel at Hawthorne Vega & Cruz LLP no later than that date
These invalidity theories span the full range of defenses available to Lumicore and present both reference-specific and patent-wide challenges that must be addressed comprehensively in the rebuttal report
For anticipation under § 102, Lumicore must prove by clear and convincing evidence that a single prior-art reference discloses every element of an asserted claim, arranged as in the claim
Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness (Global) Secondary considerations of non-obviousness — often referred to as "objective indicia" or the "Graham factors" — are an essential component of the obviousness analysis and must be given appropriate weight
2016) (en banc) ("[O]bjective indicia of nonobviousness must be considered before a conclusion on obviousness is reached and are not just a secondary consideration
For the commercial success evidence to be probative, a nexus must be established between the patented features and the commercial success