Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / memo-support-motion-to-compel.docx
memo-support-motion-to-compel.docx
Parties
STATEMENT Plaintiff Optiwave Semiconductor Corp
Cruz LLP
Harkness LLP
Conoco Inc
EchoStar Commc'ns Corp
Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH
Dana Corp
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc
Dates
October 21, 2024
July 10, 2023
June 17, 2024
December 3, 2024
September 14, 2016
March 19, 2019
April 7, 2017
January 12, 2021
November 22, 2014
June 13, 2017
Amounts
$265
$34.5
$24
$3.4
$37
$94.8
$128.4
$41.7
$264.9
Obligations
3d at 1303 ("[T]he advice itself and the potential ramifications of that advice must be available to both parties
The EchoStar court reasoned that when a party places counsel's advice at issue, both the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine must yield to the opposing party's need to examine the advice
A party that chooses to deploy counsel's opinions as part of its litigation strategy must accept the consequences of that choice, including disclosure
Caroline Ashford, must address the technical adequacy of Lumicore's non-infringement positions