Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / letter-to-whitfield-escalation-critical-deadlines.docx
letter-to-whitfield-escalation-critical-deadlines.docx
Parties
HARKNESS LLP
General Counsel Optiwave Semiconductor Corp
Optiwave Semiconductor Corp
Sayer LLP
Dates
January 8, 2025
February 14, 2022
December 2, 2024
August 11, 2023
September 6, 2023
March 9, 2025
January 10, 2022
January 10, 2023
January 9, 2023
November 3, 2020
Amounts
$25,000
$640
$22,000
$30,000
$2,000
$2,560
$4,500
$6,750
$15,000
$38.5
Obligations
The existence of this draft partially reduces the total work needed to prepare and file the response; however, the draft must be thoroughly updated to account for intervening developments in the prosecution record, finalized, and subjected to full partner review before it can be filed
If OWS intends to pursue patent protection in additional jurisdictions — such as South Korea, China, Taiwan, or other commercially significant markets for silicon-photonic semiconductor components — the national-phase entry filings and associated government fees must be authorized and funded before this date
While this deadline is approximately twelve months away, JPO examination requests require strategic decisions regarding claim scope and prosecution approach, and the associated government fees must be budgeted in advance
The cap was presumably set based on assumptions about a steady-state, low-activity patent maintenance posture, but the accumulation of deferred deadlines over seventeen months of dormancy has created a compressed timeline in which multiple significant actions must be taken in rapid succession
That said, at an absolute minimum, OWS must authorize and fund the Application A1 response before March 9, 2025
3 requires that a lawyer "shall not intentionally, repeatedly, or recklessly fail to act with reasonable diligence in representing a client