FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / evidentiary-objections-named-plaintiffs.docx
evidentiary-objections-named-plaintiffs.docx · 1017-00004

Parties

Defendant Aurelius Media Americas Inc
Tarrant Corp
Hargrove Analytics Inc
Pinnacle Economic Consulting Group LLC
Brinker Restaurant Corp
HARKNESS LLP
SALAS LLP

Dates

June 16, 2023
April 14, 2023
March 14, 2019
August 5, 2022
November 1, 2018
June 1, 2020
November 30, 2022
May 9, 2023
January 10, 2018
May 17, 2022

Amounts

$28.50
$24.75
$31.00

Obligations

" A declaration submitted in support of or in opposition to a motion must be made on personal knowledge and must set forth facts that would be admissible in evidence
The proponent must demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the facts necessary for the testimony's admissibility have been established
This is precisely the type of inadmissible generalization that must be excluded to ensure the Court's certification analysis rests on admissible evidence
This analysis must account for variations across facilities, show units, production types, supervisors, shift lengths, and individual employee practices
The absence of timekeeping data for rest periods means that evidence of rest period practices must come from testimony of individual employees and supervisors—testimony that, by its nature, will vary by facility, show unit, supervisor, and production type