Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / cross-examination-outlines-kestrel-witnesses.docx
cross-examination-outlines-kestrel-witnesses.docx
Parties
Kestrel Dynamics GmbH
MHM Whitmore Aerospace LLC
Harkness LLP
Respondent Whitmore Aerospace LLC
Valkyr Precision Components Inc
Arclight Materials Science Inc
Albrecht Prüftechnik GmbH
Ridgeline Economic Consulting LLC
Dates
June 15, 2018
February 10, 2020
September 3, 2021
March 17, 2023
March 7, 2022
September 19, 2022
October 3, 2022
November 7, 2022
October 16, 2023
Amounts
€5.17
€8,432.92
€5,222.92
€47.3
€12.83
€27.15
€3.42
€3.90
€3,210
€8,078.74
Obligations
The cross-examination must demonstrate that Kestrel's cure efforts, to the extent any were undertaken, were insufficient in both scope and timeliness
The cross-examination must expose the inconsistency of this position
The cross-examination must challenge the credibility and quantum of Kestrel's damages claim across its principal components: (a) lost profits for the remaining MSA term (€12
Dieter Langfeld of Rheinsberg Advisory AG must be tested against Kestrel's actual historical margins, and the renewal-period claim must be shown to rest on the unfounded assumption that WAL would have exercised both discretionary renewal options
Voss is Kestrel's quality expert and must be pinned to specific data points
Over that six-month period, did you implement any effective corrective measures that stopped the pattern of rejections? The answer must be no, because the rejections continued through September 2022