Extract to table

To the extent that any information set forth herein is inconsistent with or supplementary to information provided in VHG's initial responses, these Supplemental Responses shall be deemed to supersede VHG's initial responses

VHG further contends that, to the extent there is any ambiguity in the policy endorsements concerning the named-windstorm sub-limit — including any failure by Ironclad to issue a clear endorsement deleting the sub-limit notwithstanding the parties' agreement to do so — such ambiguity must be construed against Ironclad as the drafter of the policy under well-established principles of Florida insurance law