FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / opposition-to-defendants-cross-motion-psj.docx
opposition-to-defendants-cross-motion-psj.docx · 1021-00003

Parties

Plaintiff Verimark Hospitality Group Inc
Defendants Ironclad Indemnity Corp
Pinnacle Surplus Lines Inc
Tidewater Risk Advisors LLC
See Celotex Corp
Ironclad Indemnity Corp
Sovereign Re Ltd
Arbor Claims Services LLC

Dates

November 29, 2023
November 15, 2023
July 1, 2021
July 1, 2022
July 1, 2023
November 1, 2023
September 12, 2022
September 18, 2022
September 16, 2022
September 17, 2022

Amounts

$15
$60
$412
$78
$500,000
$25,000,000
$980,000
$15,000,000
$410,000
$10,000,000

Obligations

510, as amended effective May 1, 2021, summary judgment shall be granted "if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
In evaluating a motion for summary judgment, the Court must construe all facts, draw all reasonable inferences, and resolve all doubts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party
Where the record contains conflicting evidence — including deposition testimony, documentary evidence, and competing interpretations of contractual language — summary judgment must be denied
However, when an insurance policy is ambiguous — that is, when its language is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation — the ambiguity must be resolved in favor of the insured and against the insurer, which drafted the policy
At the summary judgment stage, the Court is required to credit Mr
The Moving Defendants' cross-motion asks this Court to resolve factual ambiguities that even Ironclad's own personnel have been unable to resolve — precisely the type of disputed issue that must be left for trial