Extract to table

Defense counsel contends that the GRR definition was drafted to address booking intermediaries (such as OTAs and travel agents), not separate management companies, and that the definition must be read in context with other FLA provisions that reference "the franchisee" as the revenue-collecting entity

3d DCA 2003), for the propositions that (i) courts should not rewrite unambiguous contract terms, and (ii) franchise-agreement revenue-reporting obligations must be interpreted to effectuate the parties' intent as expressed in the plain language of the agreement

Under Florida law, a contract provision is not ambiguous simply because the parties disagree about its meaning; ambiguity must arise from the language itself, and no reasonable reading of § 4

2(c), which provides that "systematic underreporting of Gross Room Revenue shall constitute a material breach that is incapable of cure

Assuming the Court finds the GRR definition unambiguous, it must determine whether the undisputed record establishes that Coastal Palms excluded revenues falling within the definition

The Court must determine whether Coastal Palms has raised a genuine dispute of material fact sufficient to defeat summary judgment