Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / aspen-skiing-trinko-analysis-memo.docx
aspen-skiing-trinko-analysis-memo.docx
Parties
HARKNESS LLP
Ridgepoint Communications Inc
Northgate Networks America Inc
Northgate Telecommunications PLC
Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp
Harborview Holdings Inc
Northgate PLC
Caravel Capital Partners LP
Dates
June 14, 2020
November 14, 2022
March 31, 2022
June 15, 2015
March 16, 2020
September 19, 2022
February 7, 2023
March 14, 2023
March 15, 2024
April 12, 2024
Amounts
$11.3
$5.96
$2.41
$387
$510
$12,000
$36,000
$432,000
$14,400
$2,400
Obligations
Key Elements of the *Aspen Skiing* Test The Aspen Skiing decision establishes several essential elements that a plaintiff must demonstrate in order to sustain a refusal-to-deal claim under Section 2: First, a prior voluntary course of dealing
The parties must have had an existing, voluntary, and presumably profitable business relationship
The monopolist must have unilaterally terminated the prior arrangement
The monopolist must have forfeited its own short-term economic interests in order to achieve an exclusionary end
The monopolist must have failed to offer a legitimate, non-pretextual business reason for the termination of the prior arrangement
§§ 251–252, establish a detailed regulatory regime governing the terms and conditions under which ILECs must provide interconnection access to CLECs