FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / trial-plan-preliminary.docx
trial-plan-preliminary.docx · 1022-00005

Parties

Northgate Telecommunications PLC
Harkness LLP
Meridian Infrastructure Partners LLC
Northgate Fiber Americas Inc
M. Ricci
Crestline Construction Group Inc
Sharma LLP
Keystone Project Advisory LLC

Dates

January 20, 2025
March 31, 2025
May 15, 2025
January 27, 2025
April 1, 2024
January 18, 2024
February 2, 2024
February 19, 2024
March 5, 2024
March 12, 2024

Amounts

$200,000,000
$149,000,000
$349,000,000
$1.2
$629
$18.3
$275,000
$26,500
$87
$49,000,000

Obligations

The provision states that "no change in the Work shall be binding upon either party unless set forth in a Change Order signed by authorized representatives of both Owner and Contractor
To prevail, Meridian must establish either (a) that there was no material breach by Meridian that would have entitled Northgate to terminate under MCA § 14
Meridian must show that it is entitled to release of the 10% retainage held by Northgate on $569,666,670 in gross certified work, notwithstanding the termination for cause
Key Affirmative Defenses In addition to defending against Meridian's claims and prosecuting Northgate's counterclaims, the trial plan must account for several affirmative defenses that will be important at trial: • Material Breach Justifying Termination under MCA § 14
Meridian's Affirmative Defenses Each of Meridian's three principal affirmative defenses—permitting delays, constructive change orders, and force majeure—presents a distinct factual and legal issue that must be addressed at trial
Northgate must prove the reasonableness of the Crestline replacement contract ($712,000,000) and the remediation cost estimates ($18,300,000)