Extract to table

" This contractual standard of care is central to Ironside's claims, as it establishes an independent, contractually defined duty against which Vantor's conduct must be measured — a duty that exists entirely apart from any obligation imposed by the Martin Act

However, even under this broad interpretation, the conduct at issue must bear a meaningful nexus to a securities transaction or offering

The rationale for this rule is fundamental: the opposing party must have an opportunity to respond to every argument raised by the movant