FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / opposition-to-mtd.docx
opposition-to-mtd.docx · 1023-00002

Parties

DIVISION IRONSIDE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP
IRONSIDE CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND LP
IRONSIDE STRUCTURED ALPHA FUND LP
IRONSIDE SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND LP
HARKNESS LLP
Plaintiff Ironside Capital Management LP
Defendant Vantor Holdings Corp
Ironside Capital Management LP

Dates

March 21, 2025
August 4, 2023
December 31, 2024
June 15, 2017
June 14, 2022
March 1, 2019
June 10, 2022
January 1, 2020
November 14, 2022
February 8, 2023

Amounts

$4.2
$287
$156.4
$88.7
$41.9
$2.98
$1.8
$1.1
$680
$3.58

Obligations

On this motion, all factual allegations in the Complaint must be accepted as true and accorded the benefit of every favorable inference
STANDARD OF REVIEW On a motion to dismiss under CPLR § 3211(a)(7), the court must accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference
Whether the plaintiff will ultimately prevail on the merits is not the issue; the motion must be denied "if from [the complaint's] four corners factual allegations are discerned which taken together manifest any cause of action cognizable at law
The documentary evidence must be "unambiguous" and of "undisputed authenticity," and it must "conclusively dispose of the plaintiff's claim
With respect to fraud claims, CPLR § 3016(b) provides that "the circumstances constituting the wrong shall be stated in detail
A court must not confuse the pleading standard — which requires only reasonable specificity — with a burden of proof