Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / conflicts-committee-analysis-memo-final.docx
conflicts-committee-analysis-memo-final.docx
Parties
Harkness LLP
Metropolitan Transit Development Corp
Veritas Biometrics Corp
Reese LLP
Falk LLP
O'Neill LLP
Sato LLP
Cho LLP
Dates
May 14, 2024
May 13, 2024
April 22, 2024
April 29, 2024
May 9, 2024
September 6, 2022
May 6, 2024
June 15, 2021
June 14, 2026
March 14, 2022
Amounts
$3.5
$5.2
$3.2
$14.8
$12.4
$62.0
$1,000
$12,400,000
$5,000
$62,000,000
Obligations
The firm must decline the proposed MTDC engagement
The matter is critical to the point that must be emphasized: the patent matter concerns the same TruScan 360 biometric platform that is at the center of the proposed MTDC engagement
A lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest
10(a), while lawyers are associated in a firm, none of them shall knowingly represent a client when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so under Rules 1
However, this prong operates as a necessary but not sufficient condition; it must be satisfied in conjunction with the other three prongs
Under established Illinois precedent and the principles articulated in the Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers § 132, a substantial relationship exists where the factual matters involved in the prior representation are so closely related to the facts in the proposed new representation that it must be assumed that confidential information relevant to the new matter was obtained during the prior representation