FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / biocompatibility-testing-strategy-memo.docx
biocompatibility-testing-strategy-memo.docx · 1037-00002

Parties

HARKNESS LLP
Solstice Biomedical Devices Ltd
Solstice Biomedical Inc
Whitmore Laboratories Inc
Pinnacle Regulatory Consulting Group LLC
Meridian Conformity Assessment GmbH
Crestline IP Advisory LLC

Dates

May 12, 2025
March 3, 2025
August 31, 2025
September 15, 2025
April 30, 2026
August 14, 2025
June 16, 2025
September 12, 2024
June 18, 2022
March 7, 2024

Amounts

$485,000
$80,000
$120,000
$25,000
$40,000
$30,000
$50,000
$150,000
$6,127,417
$415,000

Obligations

As a Class II device, the Lumina CGM System is subject to the premarket notification (510(k)) pathway, and the 510(k) submission must include adequate biocompatibility data to support a determination of substantial equivalence to the identified predicate devices
The Lumina CGM System comprises two distinct components with fundamentally different contact profiles, which must be evaluated separately
Although iridium is generally considered to be a rare allergen, the combination of iridium with platinum and any proprietary surface treatments or processing aids used in the PtIr-4G deposition process must be evaluated
The test protocols must include appropriate positive controls to validate assay sensitivity and appropriate extraction conditions to ensure worst-case extractable levels are captured
Biocompatibility Risk Factors The biocompatibility risk assessment for the PtIr-4G electrode coating must consider each constituent element and the alloy as a whole: Platinum
Relationship to Freedom-to-Operate Analysis The biocompatibility testing strategy for the PtIr-4G electrode coating must be coordinated with Solstice's ongoing freedom-to-operate ("FTO") analysis, being conducted by Crestline IP Advisory LLC ("Crestline")