Extract to table

The existence of dueling expert opinions on that comparison, supported by documentary evidence, physical teardown analyses, and bench testing data, creates material factual disputes that a jury must resolve

In evaluating a motion for summary judgment, the Court must view all facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and draw all reasonable inferences in its favor

Where the non-moving party has presented evidence creating a genuine factual dispute, summary judgment must be denied

Conversely, where the parties' technical experts offer conflicting testimony on whether the accused device meets a claim limitation, summary judgment must be denied because a genuine dispute of material fact exists

On a motion for summary judgment of infringement, the patentee must demonstrate that no reasonable jury could find in favor of the accused infringer on the question of infringement

Whether the PE-12000's design falls within or outside the Court's construction is precisely the type of factual question that must be resolved by the jury