Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / opposition-to-iosa-intervention.docx
opposition-to-iosa-intervention.docx
Parties
HARKNESS LLP
Defendant Cascade Retail Holdings Inc
TANAKA LLP
Defendant Pinnacle Market Group Inc
Peck LLP
Cascade Retail Holdings Inc
Pinnacle Market Group Inc
Delaware General Corp
Dates
September 8, 2025
June 23, 2025
July 14, 2025
March 17, 2025
May 7, 2025
March 14, 2026
June 14, 2026
March 14, 2025
March 7, 2025
April 28, 2025
Amounts
$4.7
$282
$2.8
$26.85
$22.30
$28.6
$9.3
$3.1
$527
$11.4
Obligations
This generalized assertion falls far short of what is required to justify intervention in an expedited preliminary injunction proceeding
To overcome this presumption, the proposed intervenor must make a "compelling showing" that the existing party's representation is inadequate
2002) (where the government is acting on behalf of a constituency, "the party seeking to intervene must demonstrate that the government's representation is inadequate"); Trbovich v
The court "must consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original parties' rights
28) remains in full force and effect, and the evidentiary hearing on the FTC's motion for preliminary injunction shall proceed as scheduled on September 8, 2025