FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / opposition-to-preliminary-injunction.docx
opposition-to-preliminary-injunction.docx · 1038-00001

Parties

Defendant Cascade Retail Holdings Inc
HARKNESS LLP
Co-Defendant Pinnacle Market Group Inc
TANAKA LLP
Defendant Pinnacle Market Group Inc
Cascade Retail Holdings Inc
Pinnacle Market Group Inc
Brindoval Analytics LLC

Dates

August 11, 2025
March 14, 2025
March 7, 2025
June 1, 2019
January 31, 2025
June 27, 2025
September 18, 2020
December 31, 2024
March 17, 2025
March 12, 2025

Amounts

$4.7
$26.85
$22.30
$340
$195
$145
$28.6
$9.3
$3.1
$527

Obligations

Second, if the FTC satisfies the likelihood-of-success prong, the court must weigh the equities to determine whether injunctive relief would be in the public interest
The Supreme Court has cautioned that the relevant market must "correspond to the commercial realities of the industry" and must include all products or services that are "reasonably interchangeable
If the hypothetical monopolist could not profitably impose such a price increase because sufficient customers (or, in this context, sellers) would divert their purchases to substitutes outside the proposed market, the proposed market is too narrow and must be expanded to include those substitutes
The Court held that for platforms that facilitate "simultaneous transactions" between two groups of participants, the relevant market must encompass both sides of the platform, and competitive effects must be assessed by considering the impact on both groups
Circuit has made clear, market concentration statistics create only a rebuttable presumption, and courts must look beyond the numbers to the actual competitive dynamics of the market