Extract to table

They conflate the well-settled "reasonableness" inquiry with a strict-scrutiny-like "least restrictive means" test, arguing that because the covenants could theoretically have been drawn more narrowly, they must be struck down

See All Pro Maids, 2004 WL 1878784, at *5 ("The court must determine only whether the covenant is 'reasonable,' not whether it represents the narrowest possible restraint

Moreover, Defendants' argument ignores the critical context in which these covenants must be evaluated

Defendants cite no Delaware authority for the proposition that a plaintiff alleging both breach of restrictive covenant and trade secret misappropriation must demonstrate irreparable harm beyond the presumption arising from the breach itself