Extract to table

§ 341, which provides that the Court of Chancery "shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters and causes in equity

The Court retains discretion to review the proposed terms and must satisfy itself that the consent order is fair, reasonable, and not contrary to law or public policy

The movant must prove the elements of a breach-of-contract claim, including the existence of the agreement, the specific obligation breached, and resulting damages

The disadvantage is that the consent order itself may lack the specificity necessary for contempt enforcement, because the Court (and any reviewing judge) must look to the attached exhibit to determine the scope of the obligations

The specificity requirement takes on particular importance in the restrictive covenant context, where the boundaries of permitted and prohibited conduct must be defined with precision

The three restricted product categories — home goods, seasonal décor, and private-label apparel — must be defined with precision in the consent order itself, not merely by cross-reference to undefined terms or to general industry parlance