Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / reply-opposition-motion-to-compel.docx
reply-opposition-motion-to-compel.docx
Parties
HARKNESS LLP
Defendant Cascade Retail Holdings Inc
Plaintiff Vantor Holdings Corp
Hemsworth Consumer Products LLC
Tridale Manufacturing Inc
Orion Lifestyle Brands Corp
Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd
See Glenrock Corp
Dates
August 3, 2022
July 29, 2022
June 15, 2022
July 15, 2022
September 7, 2021
March 15, 2019
March 14, 2022
January 10, 2020
January 9, 2022
July 1, 2018
Amounts
$6.8
$487,000
$650,000
$900,000
$1.5
$87.4
$34.2
$22.8
$30.4
Obligations
Each of these elements must be proven with respect to the specific contracts at issue in this case — and only those contracts
4th 1134, 1150 (Section 17200 claim must be predicated on an underlying unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent act)
Proportionality Under California Law Requires Balancing Burden Against Need The California discovery statutes and the case law interpreting them impose a proportionality requirement that the Court must apply in evaluating Vantor's motion
It rests on the assumption that, among Cascade's hundreds of supplier relationships, there must be some that involved the same type of conduct alleged in this case