Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / comparative-consent-decree-analysis.docx
comparative-consent-decree-analysis.docx
Parties
HARKNESS LLP
Torchlight Mining Corp
Whitfield Brennan LLP
Canada Business Corp
Dates
November 20, 2024
January 1, 2012
October 31, 2024
June 14, 2027
June 14, 2055
September 12, 2025
June 14, 2025
Amounts
$31.5
$7,875,000
$4.82
2023 USD
$3.56
$1.14
$843
$14.2
$8.0
$22.0
Obligations
The United States, acting through EPA and/or DOJ-ENRD, must appear as plaintiff or co-plaintiff
The defendant or settling party must be a mining company (including open-pit, underground, and heap-leach operations), a metals processor, or a specialty chemical manufacturer
Direct comparisons must be understood as providing benchmarks and reference ranges rather than dispositive precedent
Specifically, a SEP must be designed to address the type of environmental or public health harm caused by the violation and must benefit the community or environment affected by the violation