FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / post-bind-policy-review-do-tower.docx
post-bind-policy-review-do-tower.docx · 1005-00003

Parties

HARKNESS LLP
Nexford Industrial Holdings Inc
Ashford Breckinridge LLP
Pinnacle Re Insurance Ltd
Nexford Corp
Structure Nexford Industrial Holdings Inc
Triton Fastener Corp
M. Best

Dates

July 22, 2022
July 1, 2022
July 1, 2023
June 28, 2022
June 13, 2022
June 3, 2022
August 31, 2022
April 22, 2022
January 15, 2020
May 27, 2022

Amounts

$10,000,000
$1,000,000
$377,200. 1
$165,000. 2
$20,000,000
$221,000
$198,750
$30,000,000
$146,000
$15,000,000

Obligations

2), C&H recommended that Nexford negotiate a broadened definition of "Insured Person" to include: (a) any duly elected or appointed director or duly appointed officer of the Company or any Subsidiary; (b) any person who serves in a de facto capacity as a director or officer of the Company or any Subsidiary, whether or not formally appointed; (c) any member of any advisory board, advisory committee, or similar body of the Company or any Subsidiary; (d) any employee of the Company or any Subsidiary who serves in an outside capacity as a director, officer, trustee, regent, governor, or equivalent position of another entity at the specific written request of the Company; and (e) any person who was, now is, or shall become a person described in (a) through (d) above
The provision expressly states that the application shall be construed as a separate application by each Insured Person, and that no statements made or knowledge possessed by any one Insured Person shall be imputed to any other Insured Person for purposes of determining the availability of coverage
(ii) Employment Practices Carve-Back: Claims brought by an Insured Person against the Company or another Insured Person arising out of an employment-related dispute (including wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, or retaliation) shall not be subject to the insured-versus-insured exclusion
(iii) Bankruptcy Trustee / Examiner Carve-Back: Claims brought by or on behalf of a bankruptcy trustee, debtor-in-possession, examiner, receiver, liquidator, rehabilitator, or creditors' committee shall not be subject to the insured-versus-insured exclusion
6), C&H recommended that Nexford negotiate "presumptive allocation" language favoring the insured in mixed claims, under which the insurer is required to advance and pay the maximum covered portion of any Loss unless the insurer can demonstrate that a different allocation is appropriate
The provision states that in the event of a mixed claim, the Insurer and the Insured shall use their best efforts to agree upon a fair and proper allocation