FR EA

Extract to table

Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.

Extract to table / comparative-bti-rulings-analysis-memo.docx
comparative-bti-rulings-analysis-memo.docx · 1044-00005

Parties

HARKNESS LLP
Logistics SA
Argonaut Trade Consulting GmbH
Oceanos Underwriters SA

Dates

December 8, 2022
November 15, 2022
February 7, 2023
August 12, 2022
June 14, 2021
June 13, 2024
September 3, 2020
September 2, 2023
November 30, 2022
March 1, 2023

Amounts

€38,400,000
€28,800,000
€1,478,400
€67,200,000
€633,600
€844,800
€3,600,000

Obligations

Article 34(10) provides that where a national customs authority identifies divergent BTI rulings issued by customs authorities in other member states for identical or substantially similar goods, the authority may — and in practice must — refer the matter to DG TAXUD to ensure uniform classification across the customs territory of the European Union
GIR 1 provides that classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes, and that classification shall be determined first by reference to the heading text
GIR 3(a) provides that when goods are prima facie classifiable under two or more headings, the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description
Classification must be based on what the machine is, not what the operator does with it
Under Article 34(10), where the customs authorities of different member states have issued divergent BTI rulings for identical or substantially similar goods, the Commission shall adopt measures to ensure uniform classification