Extract to table
Pull the structured facts out of a document: parties, dates, amounts, obligations.
Extract to table / opposition-to-motion-to-dismiss-counterclaim.docx
opposition-to-motion-to-dismiss-counterclaim.docx
Parties
Counter-Plaintiff Nexford Industrial Holdings Inc
Harkness LLP
Drayton Partners LLC
Burger King Corp
John Crane Inc
Associates LLP
Dates
November 2, 2022
October 3, 2022
January 15, 2020
January 14, 2023
August 8, 2022
September 19, 2022
October 17, 2022
Amounts
$210,000
$620
$740
$15.97
$340
$48
$74.40
$88.80
$6.41
$1.68
Obligations
In ruling on a Section 2-615 motion, the Court must accept all well-pleaded facts in the counterclaim as true and draw all reasonable inferences from those facts in favor of the counter-plaintiff
The Counterclaim alleges, and the Court must accept as true, that Cardinal Peak failed to deliver compliant Surcharge Notices within the mandatory 15-business-day deadline under Section 7
Under Illinois law, a condition precedent is "an act or event, other than a lapse of time, which must exist or occur before a duty of immediate performance of a promise arises
2d 801, 821 (2005) (contractual terms must be given their plain and ordinary meaning, and where a contract is clear and unambiguous, its terms must be enforced as written)
To permit Cardinal Peak to do so would render Exhibit C meaningless — a result that is contrary to the well-established Illinois principle that all provisions of a contract must be given effect and no provision should be treated as surplusage
47 million overstatement attributable to Cardinal Peak's deviation from the Exhibit C methodology is a factual allegation that the Court must accept as true at this stage